Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 22 Jun 2010 01:05:49 -0700
From:      Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Dima Panov <fluffy@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/deskutils/kdepim4 Makefile pkg-plist
Message-ID:  <4C206EDD.8090408@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <201006220750.o5M7o30A067127@repoman.freebsd.org>
References:  <201006220750.o5M7o30A067127@repoman.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 06/22/10 00:50, Dima Panov wrote:
> fluffy      2010-06-22 07:50:03 UTC
> 
>   FreeBSD ports repository
> 
>   Modified files:
>     deskutils/kdepim4    Makefile pkg-plist 
>   Log:
>   - Make libassuan-1 support optional and mark port IGNORE with libassuan-1
>       support requested (it conflicts with libassuan2)
>   - Unbreak package build without libassuan-1 installed
>   
>   Noticed by:     pointyhat via pav
>   Feature safe:   yes
>   
>   Revision  Changes    Path
>   1.113     +11 -2     ports/deskutils/kdepim4/Makefile
>   1.45      +7 -7      ports/deskutils/kdepim4/pkg-plist
> 
> http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/deskutils/kdepim4/Makefile.diff?&r1=1.112&r2=1.113&f=h
> http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/deskutils/kdepim4/pkg-plist.diff?&r1=1.44&r2=1.45&f=h

Thanks for taking a look at this, but I'm confused as to your approach.
Is there something about kdepim that requires gnupg2? If not, there's no
reason that the libassuan dependency can't stay in along with gnupg 1.


Doug

-- 

	... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
			-- Propellerheads

	Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
	a domain name makeover!    http://SupersetSolutions.com/




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C206EDD.8090408>