Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 00:35:18 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, jeff@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r187580 - head/tools/sched Message-ID: <20090126083518.GB87007@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <20090122.104114.1927899760.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <200901220621.n0M6LU5v002745@svn.freebsd.org> <20090122.104114.1927899760.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:41:14AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <200901220621.n0M6LU5v002745@svn.freebsd.org> > Jeff Roberson <jeff@FreeBSD.org> writes: > : Author: jeff > : Date: Thu Jan 22 06:21:30 2009 > : New Revision: 187580 > : URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/187580 > : > : Log: > : - Update my copyright. > : +# Copyright (c) 2002-2003, 2009, Jeffrey Roberson <jeff@freebsd.org> > > Stylistically, this should be 2002-2009. We don't need to list each > and every year, so the project's policy is to list the earliest and > the latest year. There is debate on this. GCC/Bintuils/GDB require years to be specifically listed in which changes occur. Generally this means discrete years, but I believe "2002-2003, 2009" maybe accepted also. The listed years should not imply changes happened in years there was no change, which 2002-2009 would imply. This is also what the lawyers at work require. > See, for example, http://www.oppedahl.com/copyrights/ for the > reasoning behind this. Unfortunately this returns "(61) Connection refused". -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090126083518.GB87007>