From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 7 19:32:44 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6ABEA35E; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 19:32:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yh0-x22f.google.com (mail-yh0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F4128382; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 19:32:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yh0-f47.google.com with SMTP id c41so3280428yho.34 for ; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 12:32:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=RkRrVxDLe0oXCpIHWGvsxvC2DPJ5Ns5jz9w740hKPm0=; b=l9WeHfO4pB3bnhldBfOPmaFW1WIxUEaXkZpyTbXOS3dsSZNW1Ob19/ChQMfgmGuGmt qeeEz7nf7kPSUrLuqwk/UGGa0to5XwMT5XOg+ApVIsv9qQ2f8ToXzIM7dxMbbjMUr7y8 bWdX2V/VwQdna0ng+ALu6ansWjTajS5zqMu66AITsYgt1zrO3ePHqjrzWSua4Akn58Pd yo6MzXcS8hdjqqg1Sv0iiRoGcsouSwqBHqccUuOKoRbg2bLVJDYd0I+tqILP6sFJoLih oMHWCM2clYyenAq6tEMkxssSfjcGcJR1G2IOfcp1/MdSTKSlo/FWIc6l0LmqCXqdMQva pHuA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.70.229 with SMTP id p65mr8160136yhd.50.1412710363045; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 12:32:43 -0700 (PDT) Sender: antoine.brodin.freebsd@gmail.com Received: by 10.170.207.73 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 12:32:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <54343E60.7050208@FreeBSD.org> References: <201410071915.s97JFrQo061043@svn.freebsd.org> <54343E60.7050208@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 21:32:42 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: nJtrR7AZx8wVoKsDfDkD3vFscjY Message-ID: Subject: Re: 11-CURRENT redports builders miscompiling? (was: svn commit: r370388 - in head: devel/e2fsprogs-libss misc/e2fsprogs-libblkid misc/e2fsprogs-libuuid sysutils/e2fsprogs sysutils/e2fsprogs/files) From: Antoine Brodin To: Matthias Andree Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Bernhard_Fr=C3=B6hlich?= , FreeBSD Current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 19:32:44 -0000 On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Matthias Andree wrote: > Greetings, > > I have just updated sysutils/e2fsprogs and its slave ports(*), and test > drove them on redports. The self-test suite is failing on 11-CURRENT > i386 and amd64, but not on 10 or older releases. > > 11-amd64: https://redports.org/buildarchive/20141007190638-31576 > 11-i386: https://redports.org/buildarchive/20141007185700-4151 > > I am now wondering > - if there are issues with the toolchain on 11 that causes > miscompilation, or > - whether 11 is misbehaving on redports, or > - if e2fsprogs has code bugs that don't show on older toolchains. Hi, e2fsprogs version 1.42.10 tests were succeeding in a jail with a world from r272576 (1.5 day old) http://gohan2.ysv.freebsd.org/data/head-amd64-default-baseline/p370135_s272576/logs/e2fsprogs-1.42.10.log (this is poudriere, not tinderbox) Cheers, Antoine > > Any insights into the 11-CURRENT tool chain quality? > > Thanks. > > > (*) as of SVN ports revision 370388. > > Cheers, > Matthias > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"