From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun May 24 14:10:31 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA35F106566B
	for <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 24 May 2009 14:10:31 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from raven.customer.vol.cz (raven.customer.vol.cz [195.250.144.108])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 201308FC12
	for <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 24 May 2009 14:10:30 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from [192.168.0.23] (r5af140.net.upc.cz [86.49.39.140])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by raven.customer.vol.cz (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n4OEANTO014361; 
	Sun, 24 May 2009 16:10:23 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org)
From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090523135133.71a92669@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
References: <20090522.195350.193746535.chat95@mac.com>
	<20090522164138.236cb114@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
	<200905231101.59467.naylor.b.david@gmail.com>
	<20090523.182426.193741786.chat95@mac.com>
	<20090523135133.71a92669@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-V73e7rWxXC08WF38Vt/F"
Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 16:10:23 +0200
Message-Id: <1243174223.18007.2.camel@hood.oook.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port 
X-Spam-Score: -1.476 () AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_PBL
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 195.250.144.108
Cc: pgollucci@p6m7g8.com, naylor.b.david@gmail.com, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE (some more ports)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: pav@FreeBSD.org
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 14:10:32 -0000


--=-V73e7rWxXC08WF38Vt/F
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Ion-Mihai Tetcu p=ED=B9e v so 23. 05. 2009 v 13:51 +0300:

> > > - MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER defaults (but user defined) to number of cores
>=20
> This part looks OK, I wonder if there's any reason t ain't like this
> now; Pav?
> -.if defined(MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER)
> +MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER?=3D	`${SYSCTL} -n kern.smp.cpus`
>  _MAKE_JOBS=3D		-j${MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER}
> -.else
> -_MAKE_JOBS=3D		-j`${SYSCTL} -n kern.smp.cpus`
> -.endif

Wouldn't that mean an evaluation of the backtick command in every
make(1) invocation? That would be highly undesirable.

--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
              <pav@FreeBSD.org>
See file. Click file. Get file.

--=-V73e7rWxXC08WF38Vt/F
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD)

iEYEABECAAYFAkoZVUsACgkQntdYP8FOsoJh9wCfY+aj5m1fAqAf9rkuvqhhpj5r
pHAAnjnXUVWJXLKGGTRkPAR8gMeCP5aU
=gx/h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-V73e7rWxXC08WF38Vt/F--