Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2015 17:21:55 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 201363] [MAINTAINER] math/py-pandas: Update to 0.16.2 Message-ID: <bug-201363-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201363 Bug ID: 201363 Summary: [MAINTAINER] math/py-pandas: Update to 0.16.2 Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Some People Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: john@saltant.com CC: python@FreeBSD.org Flags: maintainer-feedback+ Created attachment 158383 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=158383&action=edit Update math/py-pandas to 0.16.2 Changelog ========= * Update to 0.16.2 QA == * poudriere See attached testport logs. * portlint % portlint -AC math/py-pandas WARN: Makefile: for new port, make $FreeBSD$ tag in comment section empty, to make SVN happy. 0 fatal errors and 1 warning found. * nosetests Ran 8481 tests in 1164.110s FAILED (SKIP=229, errors=56) ERROR: test_pytables_native_read (pandas.io.tests.test_pytables.TestHDFStore) This is an error in devel/py-tables. ERROR: test_to_hdf_with_object_column_names (pandas.io.tests.test_pytables.TestHDFStore) This is a new test in 0.16.2 (see https://github.com/pydata/pandas/issues/9057). There appears to be a latent defect, either in the test itself, or in the bug fix it aims to cover, because when I run the test in isolation I get a batch of NaturalNameWarning but it passes, and when I run the entire TestHDFStore fixture in isolation, there are no warnings and only test_pytables_native_read fails. I will investigate further, and send my findings upstream if appropriate, but this does not appear to be a problem with this port. All other errors are traceable to a backwards-incompatible API change as of textproc/py-openpyxl 2.2.0, which I have reported upstream (https://github.com/pydata/pandas/issues/9747). Others have noted it too (https://github.com/pydata/pandas/issues/10125). This port already advertizes the OPENPYXL2 option as "EXPERIMENTAL" per upstream documentation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-201363-13>