Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:13:16 -0400 From: Barney Wolff <barney@databus.com> To: Bob <bob@starblanket.ca> Cc: 'Bryce Edwards' <bryce@bryce.net> Subject: Re: Multiple Interfaces Message-ID: <20030731181316.GA90414@pit.databus.com> In-Reply-To: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAAtnXXFo3aIE6g1Rg4C0EjUsKAAAAQAAAA8d8LIn5QSkS9Nnwln%2BC00gEAAAAA@starblanket.ca> References: <01a801c35782$8886b380$6501010a@gis2.com> <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAAtnXXFo3aIE6g1Rg4C0EjUsKAAAAQAAAA8d8LIn5QSkS9Nnwln%2BC00gEAAAAA@starblanket.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 11:07:18AM -0600, Bob wrote: > > All you are missing is the fact FreeBSD cannot handle > two NICs the same subnet. OpenBSD does, NetBSD does and Linux does. Wrong. As already stated, make the netmask on the second one /32. Re freevrrpd, so far as I know it's intended for the case of two machines where one backs up the other, not two interfaces on one machine taking over for each other. -- Barney Wolff http://www.databus.com/bwresume.pdf I'm available by contract or FT, in the NYC metro area or via the 'Net.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030731181316.GA90414>