Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:13:16 -0400
From:      Barney Wolff <barney@databus.com>
To:        Bob <bob@starblanket.ca>
Cc:        'Bryce Edwards' <bryce@bryce.net>
Subject:   Re: Multiple Interfaces
Message-ID:  <20030731181316.GA90414@pit.databus.com>
In-Reply-To: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAAtnXXFo3aIE6g1Rg4C0EjUsKAAAAQAAAA8d8LIn5QSkS9Nnwln+C00gEAAAAA@starblanket.ca>
References:  <01a801c35782$8886b380$6501010a@gis2.com> <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAAtnXXFo3aIE6g1Rg4C0EjUsKAAAAQAAAA8d8LIn5QSkS9Nnwln+C00gEAAAAA@starblanket.ca>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 11:07:18AM -0600, Bob wrote:
> 
> All you are missing is the fact FreeBSD cannot handle
> two NICs the same subnet. OpenBSD does, NetBSD does and Linux does.

Wrong.  As already stated, make the netmask on the second one /32.

Re freevrrpd, so far as I know it's intended for the case of two machines
where one backs up the other, not two interfaces on one machine taking
over for each other.

-- 
Barney Wolff         http://www.databus.com/bwresume.pdf
I'm available by contract or FT, in the NYC metro area or via the 'Net.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030731181316.GA90414>