From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr 18 02:44:41 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D9D16A400
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 02:44:41 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dave@dogwood.com)
Received: from ms-smtp-02-eri0.socal.rr.com (ms-smtp-02-qfe0.socal.rr.com
	[66.75.162.134])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D871243D45
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 02:44:40 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from dave@dogwood.com)
Received: from white.dogwood.com (white.dogwood.com [66.91.140.178])
	by ms-smtp-02-eri0.socal.rr.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id
	k3I2id7Y006047
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 19:44:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from white.dogwood.com (localhost.dogwood.com [127.0.0.1])
	by white.dogwood.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k3I2icYJ076601
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:44:38 -1000 (HST)
	(envelope-from dave@white.dogwood.com)
Received: (from dave@localhost)
	by white.dogwood.com (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id k3I2icZj076600
	for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:44:38 -1000 (HST)
	(envelope-from dave)
From: Dave Cornejo <dave@dogwood.com>
Message-Id: <200604180244.k3I2icZj076600@white.dogwood.com>
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:44:38 -1000 (HST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2
	(white.dogwood.com [127.0.0.1]);
	Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:44:38 -1000 (HST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
Subject: crypto accelerators
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 02:44:41 -0000

I've read here before (or maybe some other freebsd list) that cards
like the Soekris 1401 don't gain as much as you'd expect due to moving
packets to/from the card over the PCI bus.  But the context is usually
one of trying to encrypt packets to increase throughput.

So the question is whether these cards, regardless of their affect on
throughput, increase usable CPU cycles?  I have several Soekris 1401
cards and am wondering if there would be any point to putting them
into some machines that provide logins over ssh.  These machines are
generally pretty good spec, 2.4GHz+, 1GB RAM, Intel MBs, mostly
on-board peripherals.

dave c