Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 19:44:30 +0200 From: Anton Berezin <tobez@FreeBSD.org> To: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, portmgr@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/p5-DateTime-Format-Excel Makefile distinfo Message-ID: <20100614174430.GA82322@heechee.tobez.org> In-Reply-To: <4C166555.4020004@p6m7g8.com> References: <201006141204.o5EC4q5J002813@repoman.freebsd.org> <4C166555.4020004@p6m7g8.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 05:22:29PM +0000, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 06/14/10 12:04, Anton Berezin wrote:
> > | -BUILD_DEPENDS= ${RUN_DEPENDS}
> > | -RUN_DEPENDS= ${SITE_PERL}/${PERL_ARCH}/DateTime.pm:${PORTSDIR}/devel/p5-DateTime
> > | +BUILD_DEPENDS= ${SITE_PERL}/${PERL_ARCH}/DateTime.pm:${PORTSDIR}/devel/p5-DateTime
> > | +RUN_DEPENDS= ${BUILD_DEPENDS}
> I really thought we were going in the other direction of not setting a
> depends = to another depends?
This particular commit did not change the status quo. The change was done
to silence portlint.
As for the substance of setting the two to be the same, I am afraid I missed
the relevant discussion - the one which reached the consensus that it is not
a good idea. Could you point me towards it?
Thanks,
\Anton.
--
Our society can survive even a large amount of irrational regulation.
-- John McCarthy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100614174430.GA82322>