Date: Wed, 9 Jul 1997 15:32:37 +0300 (EEST) From: Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee> To: Eivind Eklund <perhaps@yes.no> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: no SYSVSHM in GENERIC now.. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970709152653.11583B-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee> In-Reply-To: <199707081045.MAA16934@bitbox.follo.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 8 Jul 1997, Eivind Eklund wrote: > > [Jörg Wunsch] > > But Jordan, don't add SYSVMSG, almost nobody uses them. They are > > really non-generic in a world that can use sockets to pass messages. > > (I know that there are differences, but nevertheless, they are not in > > wide use.) > > KDE depends on them, so they might arguably be in very large use very > soon. Of course, KDE hasn't deployed yet, so we might be able to talk > them out of using it still... > Well, in 2.1 times my Xserver used to complain if there was no SYSVIPC in my kernel. Perhaps it has changed. The semaphores are also handy (the most widely used of the three?). Sander There is no love, no good, no happiness and no future - all these are just illusions. > Eivind. >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.970709152653.11583B-100000>