From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 11:20:51 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E3B16A4C1; Wed, 3 Sep 2003 11:20:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84E4B43F85; Wed, 3 Sep 2003 11:20:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (IDENT:brdavis@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.12.9/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h83IKl7c028675; Wed, 3 Sep 2003 11:20:47 -0700 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.12.9/8.12.3/Submit) id h83IKl6s028674; Wed, 3 Sep 2003 11:20:47 -0700 Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 11:20:47 -0700 From: Brooks Davis To: Max Clark Message-ID: <20030903182046.GA6161@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> References: <3F56210E.7010206@he.iki.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) on odin.ac.hmc.edu cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org cc: Petri Helenius Subject: Re: 20TB Storage System (fsck????) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 18:20:51 -0000 [Please, please, please fix your mailer to quote properly. It's very difficult to read your messages.] On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 11:08:28AM -0700, Max Clark wrote: > Ohh, that's an interesting snag. I was under the impression that 5.x w/ PAE > could address more than 4GB of Ram. > > - The PAE support allows FreeBSD machines to make use of more than 4 > gigabytes of RAM. This functionality was originally written by Jake > Burkholder under contract with DARPA and Network Associates Laboratories. > Additional changes for individual device drivers will follow in the coming > weeks. > > If fsck requires 700K for each 1GB of Disk, we are talking about 7GB of Ram > for 10TB of disk. Is this correct? Will PAE not function correctly to give > me 8GB of Ram? To check 10TB of disk? PAE increases the amount of RAM available, but does nothing to increase the address space so a given process may not address more then 2GB of RAM. -- Brooks -- Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4