Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 18:55:28 +0900 From: Koichiro Iwao <meta@FreeBSD.org> To: Niclas Zeising <zeising@freebsd.org> Cc: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r484357 - head/mail/spamassassin Message-ID: <20181107095528.szgl6dytu7zuos5r@icepick.vmeta.jp> In-Reply-To: <2b3670de-7625-d458-7c93-5ea0a7ae2af1@freebsd.org> References: <201811062146.wA6LknN3005274@repo.freebsd.org> <20181107083105.55o52urafcgdthec@ivaldir.net> <20181107091004.xbvzfyviyrkcbi2m@icepick.vmeta.jp> <ca100d9e-c455-27c3-5605-2ecbb3c5a4bb@freebsd.org> <20181107092211.dgcvichyunbss35x@ivaldir.net> <2b3670de-7625-d458-7c93-5ea0a7ae2af1@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 10:33:02AM +0100, Niclas Zeising wrote: > On 11/7/18 10:22 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 10:17:50AM +0100, Niclas Zeising wrote: > > > On 11/7/18 10:10 AM, Koichiro Iwao wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 09:31:05AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > > > Is there still a need for the japanese spamassassin? if yes, can't the specific > > > > > patch be incorporated in the regular one? > > > > > > > > > > That would simplify the life of many people to have only one spamassassin > > > > > > > > > > Bapt > > > > > > > > AFAIK yes. Additional patch improves spam detection accuracy on emails written > > > > in Japanese but using mail/spamassassin's accuracy is not too bad. > > > > > > > > Regarding the current japanese/spamassassin port, I think it is deprecated. It > > > > is created for the old version of spamassassin and not updated for years. > > > > > > > > I can found another Japanese tokenizer patch for the latest > > > > spamassassin. The port should be renewed based on this: > > > > > > > > https://github.com/heartbeatsjp/spamassassin_ja > > > > > > > > > > Hi! > > > japanese/spamassassin is up for grabs. If you are interested in maintaining > > > it and in updating it with that patch, I can help a little. I don't have > > > time to maintain it myself. > > > Regards > > > > Can't those patches be available in the files directory on the > > mail/spamassassins so we have one single port to maintain? > > > > I don't know why japanese/spamassassin was made into a separate port to > begin with, it's been that way since I took over maintainership over > mail/spamassassin. > > Looking at SVN history it seems like japanese/spamassassin was created > because the patch was for an older version of spamassassin originally, so > two different versions were needed. Correct, I dimly remember that. +1 to single port. I concern about not all people need that patch. Can FLAVORS be used to create packages with/without Japanese patches? I know it can be used to handle multiple versions of PHP, Python, etc. -- meta <meta@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20181107095528.szgl6dytu7zuos5r>