From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue May 5 10:21:11 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0CE02E0B72 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 10:21:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phascolarctos@protonmail.ch) Received: from mail-40134.protonmail.ch (mail-40134.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "protonmail.com", Issuer "SwissSign Server Gold CA 2014 - G22" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49GbNQ5T8Qz3DmL for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 10:21:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phascolarctos@protonmail.ch) Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 10:21:03 +0000 To: Steve O'Hara-Smith From: Lorenzo Salvadore Cc: Nikita Stepanov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Reply-To: Lorenzo Salvadore Subject: Re: Does swap increase freebsd performance? Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20200505105901.4306c0f7aa0aec652e2cc65a@sohara.org> References: <3971481588671556@myt2-8316c2cade1b.qloud-c.yandex.net> <20200505105901.4306c0f7aa0aec652e2cc65a@sohara.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=7.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on mail.protonmail.ch X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49GbNQ5T8Qz3DmL X-Spamd-Bar: ----- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.81 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[phascolarctos@protonmail.ch]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[protonmail.ch:s=protonmail]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:185.70.40.0/24]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[protonmail.ch.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[protonmail.ch:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[protonmail.ch,quarantine]; IP_SCORE(-3.71)[ip: (-9.80), ipnet: 185.70.40.0/24(-4.89), asn: 62371(-3.91), country: CH(0.04)]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[134.40.70.185.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:62371, ipnet:185.70.40.0/24, country:CH]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[134.40.70.185.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 10:21:11 -0000 =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Original Me= ssage =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 On Tuesday 5 May 2020 11:59, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > On Tue, 05 May 2020 15:39:16 +0600 > Nikita Stepanov nikitastepanov113@yandex.kz wrote: > > We seem to be getting a rash of bodyless messages with the question > in the subject. Please type a body with your question even if it is a > repeat of the subject. I might be wrong, but I think I read something about Nikita's mails not hav= ing a body for technical issues. If that's indeed the case Nikita, you might like to contact postmaster@free= bsd.org to try to solve the problem, in the hope that you actually can write a mess= age with a body at least to postmaster... If not you can try opening a bug report on https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ and making sure to put postmaster in the= CC list. Lorenzo Salvadore