Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 18:36:08 +0200 From: David DEMELIER <demelier.david@gmail.com> To: Jim Pazarena <fports@paz.bz> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dspam install Message-ID: <AANLkTimCBZA_8HXAx1CbdT8f56dtG2VoMdN3cHPJhHzd@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4C3DDF33.4030706@paz.bz> References: <4C3A2EE7.7020104@paz.bz> <20100711212831.GA17226@magic.hamla.org> <AANLkTikNzfsunMHILOG6oUgJqPQLu9AZQWX0t50HxxRH@mail.gmail.com> <20100712230428.GB18432@magic.hamla.org> <AANLkTikSxrIkpzB-cFiGCwOrggv6-4qp-vgIw08HIIQa@mail.gmail.com> <20100713222839.GA19319@magic.hamla.org> <4C3DDF33.4030706@paz.bz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2010/7/14 Jim Pazarena <fports@paz.bz>: > Sahil Tandon wrote: >> >> [mail/dspam maintainer Cc:'d] >> >> On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 09:46:04 +0200, David DEMELIER wrote: >> >>> 2010/7/13 Sahil Tandon <sahil@freebsd.org>: >>>> >>>> On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 21:28:56 +0200, David DEMELIER wrote: >>> >>> Yes sometime I'm nasty with people, I'm sorry about that but when I >>> saw this port I just didn't understand. >> >> What did you not understand? >> >>> I apologize for my english. >> >> No apology needed, as that is not the problem here. > > my own ports confusion (in general) is that in some ports > you use a "-Dxxxxxx" to define a required (or not required) option > while in others (at least dspam) you use WITHOUT_xxx or WITH_xxx=1. > It would be nice if all ports has the same standard of definitions. > > Or... am I confused? If FreeBSD people agree, KNOBS will be removed in the future (but this will take a long long time). -- Demelier David
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTimCBZA_8HXAx1CbdT8f56dtG2VoMdN3cHPJhHzd>