From owner-freebsd-bugbusters Mon Mar 18 17: 2:16 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugbusters@freebsd.org Received: from hex.databits.net (hex.csh.rit.edu [129.21.60.203]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7848C37B404 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 17:02:14 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 15892 invoked by uid 1001); 19 Mar 2002 00:54:35 -0000 Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 19:54:35 -0500 From: Pete Fritchman To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: bugbusters@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PR state revision Message-ID: <20020318195435.A15520@databits.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from des@ofug.org on Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 01:18:15AM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-bugbusters@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ++ 19/03/02 01:18 +0100 - Dag-Erling Smorgrav: | In light of the controversy and confusion that reign over the precise | meaning of the "feedback" state, I would like to suggest the following | revision of the Gnats states: | [...] | feedback Further work requires additional information from the | originator or the community - possibly confirmation of | the effectiveness of a proposed solution. I think this is _much_ better than what we currently have. | patched Patch has been committed, but some issues (MFC and / or | confirmation from originator) are still open. This is great! "feedback" was definately the wrong category for this... "patched" is much more descriptive. --pete -- Pete Fritchman [petef@(databits.net|freebsd.org|csh.rit.edu)] finger petef@databits.net for PGP key To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugbusters" in the body of the message