Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2014 20:50:30 -0500 From: J David <j.david.lists@gmail.com> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: How thread-friendly is kevent? Message-ID: <CABXB=RQxG%2By%2BbqTpTSzEu%2BGA59Gw7pv%2Buv39t8WpgxV83BAHzg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmon3%2Bev0wq9sATbdgPKHXLF%2BQ%2BR=hX8dbBPJvH-uJD6NqQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CABXB=RQWxu-d30raZ%2BFcrnrGsr5gG2Za_=cx8-jCnLSgJDSF=Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmon3%2Bev0wq9sATbdgPKHXLF%2BQ%2BR=hX8dbBPJvH-uJD6NqQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: > Are you putting the same FD into multiple threads and hoping that only > one note will wake up on one listening kqueue? That's the behavior observed in testing. That's somewhat surprising, hence the question. Thanks!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CABXB=RQxG%2By%2BbqTpTSzEu%2BGA59Gw7pv%2Buv39t8WpgxV83BAHzg>