From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 9 22:04:55 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B510106564A for ; Sun, 9 Aug 2009 22:04:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ben@morrow.me.uk) Received: from relay.pcl-ipout01.plus.net (relay.pcl-ipout01.plus.net [212.159.7.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0907B8FC08 for ; Sun, 9 Aug 2009 22:04:54 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqYEAGLlfkrUOFPl/2dsb2JhbACBUso1hBgFgUw Received: from plesk-mail01.plus.net ([212.56.83.229]) by relay.pcl-ipout01.plus.net with ESMTP; 09 Aug 2009 23:04:53 +0100 Received: (qmail 13768 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2009 22:04:53 +0000 Received: from host81-155-197-140.range81-155.btcentralplus.com (HELO osiris.mauzo.dyndns.org) (81.155.197.140) by plesk-mail01.plus.net with SMTP; 9 Aug 2009 22:04:52 +0000 Received: (qmail 57066 invoked by uid 1001); 9 Aug 2009 22:04:52 -0000 Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 23:04:52 +0100 From: Ben Morrow To: hawei@free.fr, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090809220452.GA56972@osiris.mauzo.dyndns.org> Mail-Followup-To: hawei@free.fr, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20090725013500.GC62402@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20090725073805.GA11455@abigail.blackend.org> <20090806211401.GB2546@pollux.local.net> <68208453@h30.sp.ipt.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090809160121.GA1621@pollux.local.net> X-Newsgroups: gmane.os.freebsd.stable Organization: Who, me? User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Cc: Subject: Re: status of flash9/flash10 support in RELENG_7 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2009 22:04:55 -0000 Quoth Harald Weis : > > There is a huge problem though: > I've got now two vulnerable ports, firefox3 and linux-pango. > The linux-pango case is apparently several months old. > Any idea why the linux world doesn't seem to bother? > > How to persuade my user now not to use firefox, but w3m? > Impossible. I was about to say 'I believe the vuxml entry for firefox is incorrect', but I see it's been fixed. Neither 3.0.13 nor 3.5.2 are vulnerable, and vuxml now correctly reports this. Ben