Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 13:28:24 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> To: perryh@pluto.rain.com Cc: ports@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, ade@freebsd.org Subject: Re: outside the box (Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT) Message-ID: <4E81B358.5070706@zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <4e81e1c6.gA%2BZK1BK2KFWANDY%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <20110926230335.041fd9aa@lab.lovett.com> <CAN6yY1t5wJ3%2B4LG=upL6sR7tSNU6Uhx-y=L0AJm6rKFsKnvPiQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAGH67wRFRwaMM4sOYgK0PSvWZBTeA9qDWaPz1pEqxy42SZEogQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAN6yY1tR%2BcMGRW8KJnzERhLK=Jy295CmbC-2Eyqv6xBHxuhJ%2BA@mail.gmail.com> <CAGH67wQRK64SD3VYbNn8Di6D-jfGYtkX-KLB=UmNHXiEw=AA6g@mail.gmail.com> <20110927012902.2ebb4a3e@lab.lovett.com> <4e81e1c6.gA%2BZK1BK2KFWANDY%perryh@pluto.rain.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 09/27/11 16:46, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > Ade Lovett<ade@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> The undeniable fact is that configure scripts in general have >> chosen to do things a certain way. Unfortunately for us (us >> being FreeBSD), we have now broken these conceptions by moving >> to a dual-digit major release. > > I don't suppose > > REVISION="A.1" > > i.e. using a single hex digit instead of two decimal digits, > would work any better :) > ... it will only postpone the agony ... better to deal now than shifting it to the future ...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E81B358.5070706>