Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 7 Jul 2009 04:25:07 +0300
From:      Dan Naumov <dan.naumov@gmail.com>
To:        Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: 7.2-release/amd64: panic, spin lock held too long
Message-ID:  <cf9b1ee00907061825r34165c48x6727c50b3219d5fb@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3bbf2fe10907061818v245abd0cgc3ca5073cb93aea4@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <cf9b1ee00907061812r3da70018i1c8d8d12bb038a80@mail.gmail.com> <3bbf2fe10907061818v245abd0cgc3ca5073cb93aea4@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Attilio Rao<attilio@freebsd.org> wrote:
> 2009/7/7 Dan Naumov <dan.naumov@gmail.com>:
>> I just got a panic following by a reboot a few seconds after running
>> "portsnap update", /var/log/messages shows the following:
>>
>> Jul =A07 03:49:38 atom syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel
>> Jul =A07 03:49:38 atom kernel: spin lock 0xffffffff80b3edc0 (sched lock
>> 1) held by 0xffffff00017d8370 (tid 100054) too long
>> Jul =A07 03:49:38 atom kernel: panic: spin lock held too long
>
> That's a known bug, affecting -CURRENT as well.
> The cpustop IPI is handled though an NMI, which means it could
> interrupt a CPU in any moment, even while holding a spinlock,
> violating one well known FreeBSD rule.
> That means that the cpu can stop itself while the thread was holding
> the sched lock spinlock and not releasing it (there is no way, modulo
> highly hackish, to fix that).
> In the while hardclock() wants to schedule something else to run and
> got stuck on the thread lock.
>
> Ideal fix would involve not using a NMI for serving the cpustop while
> having a cheap way (not making the common path too hard) to tell
> hardclock() to avoid scheduling while cpustop is in flight.
>
> Thanks,
> Attilio

Any idea if a fix is being worked on and how unlucky must one be to
run into this issue, should I expect it to happen again? Is it
basically completely random?


- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cf9b1ee00907061825r34165c48x6727c50b3219d5fb>