From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Feb 1 01:29:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BA43A74143 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 01:29:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baho-utot@columbus.rr.com) Received: from cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.166.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06E12253 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 01:29:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baho-utot@columbus.rr.com) Received: from [75.187.32.8] ([75.187.32.8:42179] helo=raspberrypi.bildanet.com) by cdptpa-oedge03 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.5.0.35861 r(Momo-dev:tip)) with ESMTP id 51/3C-03237-824BEA65; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 01:26:00 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.40] (helo=baho-utot.bildanet.com) by raspberrypi.bildanet.com with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aQ3Fg-0002vM-0q for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 20:26:00 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Baho Utot Subject: CURRENT r293712 lock order reversal Message-ID: <56AEB427.8080009@columbus.rr.com> Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 20:25:59 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/42.0 SeaMonkey/2.39 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.142:25 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 01:29:19 -0000 I get the following when I unmount a thumb drive Here is how I created the system...... I installed FreeBSD-10.2 and then updated it to CURRENT by the handbook. I then rebuilt the whole system by using release.sh so I would have a clean "install" media. I then copied (dd) the memstick image to a thumb drive and booted to it. I then installed "CURRENT" from the memstick overwriting the system ie "clean install" This is from dmesg: FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 r293712: Wed Jan 13 01:02:51 UTC 2016 root@dell.bildanet.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 FreeBSD clang version 3.7.1 (tags/RELEASE_371/final 255217) 20151225 WARNING: WITNESS option enabled, expect reduced performance. lock order reversal: 1st 0xfffff800430c0d50 ufs (ufs) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_mount.c:1224 2nd 0xfffff800431cc418 devfs (devfs) @ /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c:1375 stack backtrace: #0 0xffffffff80a7a2a0 at witness_debugger+0x70 #1 0xffffffff80a7a1a1 at witness_checkorder+0xe71 #2 0xffffffff809fb9bb at __lockmgr_args+0xd3b #3 0xffffffff80ac276c at vop_stdlock+0x3c #4 0xffffffff80fb81d0 at VOP_LOCK1_APV+0x100 #5 0xffffffff80ae366a at _vn_lock+0x9a #6 0xffffffff80cb812a at ffs_flushfiles+0x11a #7 0xffffffff80c9caef at softdep_flushfiles+0x3cf #8 0xffffffff80cbab84 at ffs_unmount+0x84 #9 0xffffffff80acc200 at dounmount+0x530 #10 0xffffffff80acbc3d at sys_unmount+0x35d #11 0xffffffff80e6b15b at amd64_syscall+0x2db #12 0xffffffff80e4afdb at Xfast_syscall+0xfb From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Feb 1 02:39:44 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AC8CA75A36 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 02:39:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@shaneware.biz) Received: from ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E106DD for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 02:39:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@shaneware.biz) Received: from ppp121-45-70-178.lns20.adl6.internode.on.net (HELO leader.local) ([121.45.70.178]) by ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 01 Feb 2016 13:04:34 +1030 Subject: Re: Easiest way to watch Netflix in FreeBSD? To: Bernt Hansson References: <56ABCDA2.50206@rawbw.com> <56AC3CCA.8040708@bananmonarki.se> <20160130125916.GB31860@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Cc: FreeBSD Questions From: Shane Ambler Message-ID: <56AEC438.4020409@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 13:04:32 +1030 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160130125916.GB31860@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 02:39:44 -0000 On 30/01/2016 23:29, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Bernt Hansson wrote: >>> It turns out that chrome (chromium with some closed DRM components) is >>> needed, but it isn't available in ports. >>> So is there any way, besides using the virtual machine? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Yuri >> Yes. Don't use netflix. > > Netflix uses FreeBSD in its appliances, so not using Netflix is kind > of unfair :-) > > https://openconnect.itp.netflix.com/software/ > That would be a good argument for Netflix tech support. So you use FreeBSD to run your servers, when will you allow FreeBSD users to access your service? -- FreeBSD - the place to B...Software Developing Shane Ambler From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Feb 1 07:12:13 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26BE1A970B4 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 07:12:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9893B1CB9 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 07:12:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id u117BjaZ051403; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 18:11:45 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 18:11:45 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Valeri Galtsev cc: Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "epilogue" script? In-Reply-To: <63014.76.192.184.12.1454168056.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> Message-ID: <20160201175827.E51785@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20160131000408.N51785@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <63014.76.192.184.12.1454168056.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 07:12:13 -0000 On Sat, 30 Jan 2016 09:34:16 -0600 (CST), Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Sat, January 30, 2016 8:19 am, Ian Smith wrote: [..] > > We don't really know what Valeri wants to run, and whether it's one or > > more daemons, maybe including long-running background scripts, that may > > need start|stop|status control via service(8), or whether it's more > > simply one or more one-off tasks to be run sometime after startup? > > It is rather simple thing which I need. I'm trying to set up openvpn, and > I need _after_ starting openvpn daemon to add tap0 interface to the bridge > then set IP on the bridge and on tap0 interface the same as that of real > interface which is member of this bridge. This is the only way I managed > to make openvpn really work (by trial and error). I'm kind of not inclined > to use openvpn's mechanism (which they seemingly have) to do it (it is not > a first time I spent this long setting up something on FreeBSD, but it was > the first time I spent this time... hm, not that productive. My ignorance > is to blame, still...) I know absolutely nothing about openvpn or tap interfaces so can't help with that, except to suggest freebsd-net@ as the best place to ask. cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Feb 1 08:23:36 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4EB6A75B59 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 08:23:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vbotka@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com (mail-wm0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D07F1D26 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 08:23:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vbotka@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x230.google.com with SMTP id p63so57905721wmp.1 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 00:23:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-type; bh=aKDvjnF46n/l9u3MtNP/eaRi/gVG0LTI7652Zjz5M6g=; b=avoxWRf7g1x+NP8xFC2D3GFSCMS2DHksfS0Pe7PlL4PYq8weTO+qR2jxtVwwhbNvwb C6Rfvag1j1T6uWjM8ezV6qifiRt95LtkynDrpvejU7jY07tq96xhcAFbNy/w24Q0ECaw d0zxeDVWfo63IFi+bH8B9/aP1HcZtu11ACfaZqUuUDvpBF1biszBZ4aLDECA7eNbsnm4 gg6YYEPXLhu+3jOWDFIyFUkrZNEQ0Ukin/pGagUYBE77POPsurvSx3nUHpTY1wCi98w4 3/yNKHA7nzux8nAoeIy0U2TD7T55W2W5wAj2OXeeMj8LHUZxL4GsijzhCwFmYIx+Tr0H kkLQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-type; bh=aKDvjnF46n/l9u3MtNP/eaRi/gVG0LTI7652Zjz5M6g=; b=c4wWs6X0YjZQgd80FRczPNsWLn5yT3mc/YKnh9jrRulUkWUpOSOofle2s1e9nwZz7r thgHWK4iXfV9p8QHySRYML/R4XjzOvfy0jax2krepW/jVbUI2YxwKn9YblH9oqHh0n2S jiSEB00Sjhplu7uVSf3eXa/juFwgNxEKfKpFbEYvizWe1UjqtSb3U7GaspJOVN+C4j4M BGWY1N8m/kkOeixHiF2nxl1C6vUt5lQAoxQ3hVVohtgbQHe2o3vWeQzwfB0lMqjzuBUY OoxaoXg3JsW2CRcmO7bZ2d585gmwlrwlzn2nvg+yxu2Q2cmpOZUyTxoUdwAOyGhnWWWn FFyw== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTwStL4RBo50eNtkVEUs1EKjNYdZvaO2R/8RRHVtMDfldKQ7b6i/KEbLmXK3LbTIA== X-Received: by 10.28.21.6 with SMTP id 6mr11135563wmv.46.1454315014495; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 00:23:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from planb.netng.org (ip-89-176-92-35.net.upcbroadband.cz. [89.176.92.35]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id lc3sm27888512wjb.7.2016.02.01.00.23.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 01 Feb 2016 00:23:33 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 09:23:31 +0100 From: Vladimir Botka To: Baho Utot Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CURRENT r293712 lock order reversal Message-ID: <20160201092331.0441abf3@planb.netng.org> In-Reply-To: <56AEB427.8080009@columbus.rr.com> References: <56AEB427.8080009@columbus.rr.com> Organization: na X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.12.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; i686-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/pLhLeFt9YYPhFoK.BrmO.C+"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 08:23:36 -0000 --Sig_/pLhLeFt9YYPhFoK.BrmO.C+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 20:25:59 -0500 Hi, you might want to post it to freebsd-current@freebsd.org. More details are available here https://www.freebsd.org/doc/faq/troubleshoot.html#idp63309008 Cheers, -vlado Baho Utot wrote: > I get the following when I unmount a thumb drive >=20 > Here is how I created the system...... >=20 > I installed FreeBSD-10.2 and then updated it to CURRENT by the handbook. >=20 > I then rebuilt the whole system by using release.sh so I would have a=20 > clean "install" media. >=20 > I then copied (dd) the memstick image to a thumb drive and booted to it. > I then installed "CURRENT" from the memstick overwriting the system ie=20 > "clean install" >=20 > This is from dmesg: >=20 > FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. > FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 r293712: Wed Jan 13 01:02:51 UTC 2016 > root@dell.bildanet.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > FreeBSD clang version 3.7.1 (tags/RELEASE_371/final 255217) 20151225 > WARNING: WITNESS option enabled, expect reduced performance. >=20 > lock order reversal: > 1st 0xfffff800430c0d50 ufs (ufs) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_mount.c:1224 > 2nd 0xfffff800431cc418 devfs (devfs) @=20 > /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c:1375 > stack backtrace: > #0 0xffffffff80a7a2a0 at witness_debugger+0x70 > #1 0xffffffff80a7a1a1 at witness_checkorder+0xe71 > #2 0xffffffff809fb9bb at __lockmgr_args+0xd3b > #3 0xffffffff80ac276c at vop_stdlock+0x3c > #4 0xffffffff80fb81d0 at VOP_LOCK1_APV+0x100 > #5 0xffffffff80ae366a at _vn_lock+0x9a > #6 0xffffffff80cb812a at ffs_flushfiles+0x11a > #7 0xffffffff80c9caef at softdep_flushfiles+0x3cf > #8 0xffffffff80cbab84 at ffs_unmount+0x84 > #9 0xffffffff80acc200 at dounmount+0x530 > #10 0xffffffff80acbc3d at sys_unmount+0x35d > #11 0xffffffff80e6b15b at amd64_syscall+0x2db > #12 0xffffffff80e4afdb at Xfast_syscall+0xfb > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" --Sig_/pLhLeFt9YYPhFoK.BrmO.C+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWrxYDAAoJEJDRmRKO1E8BiMQH/3ICqf4tEHyWNf4DDhuBhHXw 31P1KgcdqyP+8SZRV7Ww9pXb0UqCbKikHr/EfHXHYlIrv6ig3mxTdzLiTuUmjZSN Z8db+b/Xl3Gb3QCwSsumh9558I5jPLDp1WsG966a6WDFdsrEMuiRwOIHqO54yoJA SivHVFUd43giJE5psCHMvZ2AqIxehSTH2wZrBdc/CzBni23rHklXP3Q8KjJfDtyw 1wc/Xyc54o95j9aqhjOE2g8NoCzOxyrlVe0RDA287AOQGrck++HZ3gn3zVjp4kIf utQSGEcmk0c/fUB1w7JYcF/agxfyJiwEzx88JBdL+heSk6vvKqp0PMBixhc7AH4= =pnnu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/pLhLeFt9YYPhFoK.BrmO.C+-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Feb 1 12:40:44 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFA26A7416B for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 12:40:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mmatalka@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x231.google.com (mail-wm0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78C2B1D99 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 12:40:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mmatalka@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x231.google.com with SMTP id p63so69078957wmp.1 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 04:40:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=FzML1swuZtc7t33d2kGSVBEFBobB/Xy02GtQEqqUtuI=; b=rD7iYc7aiTSGPpgC9EKTT+kMFxzjw/QQoCc6EU64AiDYtoNqwCw9NObT4W32P5AdCo 5JoPCysN0pswZYoN/ESUl2eywdIrVqYdCeWrDKONsWpeYDoP3pOZYnIVsmm7dk29SPRx RdgTclZsDSt+ORZhaw4AmkZInTHBygmPtGTSNtKqH32E8vxIt2ijy1nQudh4nkobR4WN 3IINCCkcAktkd02UYsygp+ELQ2wPoouobT03emmJHxMjaXrSKfkdA2ckg6AoGgsx6HSS xDt7InoYPzUkgnDIFdKP3i4oaCbf91n+bzMMxNqfrOzh2RYAVy+Fy36kGQoRYhtjoojU nIvQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=FzML1swuZtc7t33d2kGSVBEFBobB/Xy02GtQEqqUtuI=; b=Gvl94RGAlKznbQseI0oY70LV8L9AC0iGcsp6+EkAiCr01jO5weovdOIOUDzhgXj9Xe xBshycgcLiC3/EDWct3tYPVDTcehWoNAYJ0IFukEmoLBljgZT5YHepa3+LBfPCisdeO0 geuEV8m37lCnbEu7ISshjZavGKslpC3cLcYsydJ+7G2DOEqaii6fi5oq3FJ7xmPZ+muR WijrEo/STqAvPnEJVitPLQqOwlGYlC7y6IfXXanyXEVxo5rsKK1EdwtyT0fjd3n1ArX/ VY3w1NDoW7kmZfXIw1e+6MSQsSTgqzX9T+Jx0SVosfF2/sJImLoAEWn885udKnk9Bs/4 rFLA== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQkRBfB4pBuLhcA7D62MCsxOz/8IRTIohHOhH85T3ETuoBg+HbdbZ0f9j/jZ9xAaQ== X-Received: by 10.194.52.37 with SMTP id q5mr22296285wjo.123.1454330442916; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 04:40:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([37.153.108.22]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ei9sm28905470wjd.40.2016.02.01.04.40.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 01 Feb 2016 04:40:41 -0800 (PST) From: Malcolm Matalka To: Shane Ambler Cc: Bernt Hansson , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Easiest way to watch Netflix in FreeBSD? References: <56ABCDA2.50206@rawbw.com> <56AC3CCA.8040708@bananmonarki.se> <20160130125916.GB31860@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <56AEC438.4020409@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 12:40:33 +0000 In-Reply-To: <56AEC438.4020409@ShaneWare.Biz> (Shane Ambler's message of "Mon, 1 Feb 2016 13:04:32 +1030") Message-ID: <867fiosiwu.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 12:40:45 -0000 Shane Ambler writes: > On 30/01/2016 23:29, Victor Sudakov wrote: >> Bernt Hansson wrote: >>>> It turns out that chrome (chromium with some closed DRM components) is >>>> needed, but it isn't available in ports. >>>> So is there any way, besides using the virtual machine? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Yuri >>> Yes. Don't use netflix. >> >> Netflix uses FreeBSD in its appliances, so not using Netflix is kind >> of unfair :-) >> >> https://openconnect.itp.netflix.com/software/ >> > > That would be a good argument for Netflix tech support. > > So you use FreeBSD to run your servers, when will you allow FreeBSD > users to access your service? Does Pipelight work? It's in pkg. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Feb 1 13:35:42 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D7EDA9745B for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 13:35:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pathiaki2@yahoo.com) Received: from nm5-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm5-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.213.150]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7CBA19DE for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 13:35:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pathiaki2@yahoo.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1454333734; bh=qEHzqpARElhcq5LOpUaQZ/DWcg96mcfSH68bXtZEn0Q=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=FftLGOxuuNhRFSktPd5/YG2gRT+HeIVFeF5hA5XkMZcnB45XND3xNYr/fTw5hNtZ3Xaw6ZFviOexpsCMW2/20qtdxFYMAL4eRUpkySfwExCh1NyjTF/6UgL07L6+HFBx73E1EVhgvPcfgDvRBmTdLenodBUAyhSdTcevYu6d6+b5Pn6iphaycP05clSIcMtjl71VccBdWKr6fBY0L/esvu+9o4Z/jluR9Nfsjaw4s5nk6uGg9aesGlt4ek7jDTO9YZj9zg+9RgD35+I4eN8+NaLJJoLu3FJHOiuPjbQ8IUOkXMtEHcdULGRPHkKsItkbXwJjhCFJg6oOGtiHF3LU2g== Received: from [66.196.81.173] by nm5.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Feb 2016 13:35:34 -0000 Received: from [98.139.211.205] by tm19.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Feb 2016 13:35:34 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp214.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Feb 2016 13:35:34 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 558526.19883.bm@smtp214.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: kz_.RvAVM1kf4hdREPBePQfcoFHm2FbOy62unFOM8MDNY56 qUVE2lcfPh9uAceOQYQkZdAnLWMw93HYv5g1m4BXByaMhmwBU2Ml4BOwQnN9 PEZP8KVCWvX9YFYpinsAiGeYYesCVB.0zo79f_3eBsK3vQteUJB.hEVpfWKj ojK6Ew7kt.YVHHDapIq_.xVn0S2LH9QGcIdPyQSRio.ZZK5gD6HdXfB63wqC CtcupTOfwK7TdXmiiETrA2a_l9Xr0VYdPmOQCQeONA6R7.cioGfw1mcFgw1n 2EEXKSFq2f7iYjpzrpo7U56v1DihyVAjKQrAl5Zcew113jZ91iPZAuJeM7Ri 5K9OzOvToTp_8rvO_6t6PK69glHFJ45SP8B8yq3FJDyKZsna6H2eWcCAVIbt MQHruRI45SCVvTUWuYVrhnnhzsKNUWDi2ocbuqpk6gweVNFVeKzTouMd0tcO bP.z_ZiHJHN7H8kDxT8bek5.vWeNzhcnbA5BPWvRc0cPG0n0rO8WNiF_Mu1n EgVsc63CPcPqlGU4oKD6K7Jy1EvxHh8fg_w-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: h3Xqg6.swBC0yI913RMMwp94grO_cg-- Subject: Re: Easiest way to watch Netflix in FreeBSD? To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <56ABCDA2.50206@rawbw.com> <56AC3CCA.8040708@bananmonarki.se> <20160130125916.GB31860@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <56AEC438.4020409@ShaneWare.Biz> <867fiosiwu.fsf@gmail.com> From: Paul Pathiakis Message-ID: <56AF5F1C.1020305@yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 08:35:24 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <867fiosiwu.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 13:35:42 -0000 You MAY have luck with the user agent switcher. Search in Firefox addons and, once installed, download from: http://techpatterns.com/forums/about304.html There's a major set of extensions to make the browser identify itself as any number of OS and browser identities. I don't have time to test and find out what works. (What's really annoying is that they are detecting for browsers at all. It's HTML5 which is supposed to be fully independent.) Please let the list know if you find anything that works. :-) P. On 02/01/2016 07:40, Malcolm Matalka wrote: > Shane Ambler writes: > >> On 30/01/2016 23:29, Victor Sudakov wrote: >>> Bernt Hansson wrote: >>>>> It turns out that chrome (chromium with some closed DRM components) is >>>>> needed, but it isn't available in ports. >>>>> So is there any way, besides using the virtual machine? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Yuri >>>> Yes. Don't use netflix. >>> Netflix uses FreeBSD in its appliances, so not using Netflix is kind >>> of unfair :-) >>> >>> https://openconnect.itp.netflix.com/software/ >>> >> That would be a good argument for Netflix tech support. >> >> So you use FreeBSD to run your servers, when will you allow FreeBSD >> users to access your service? > > Does Pipelight work? It's in pkg. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Feb 1 14:20:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0477CA9723F for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 14:20:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu) Received: from cosmo.uchicago.edu (cosmo.uchicago.edu [128.135.70.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8A0DDC2 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 14:20:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu) Received: by cosmo.uchicago.edu (Postfix, from userid 48) id C349FCB8CAB; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 08:20:41 -0600 (CST) Received: from 76.192.184.12 (SquirrelMail authenticated user valeri) by cosmo.uchicago.edu with HTTP; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 08:20:41 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <53364.76.192.184.12.1454336441.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> In-Reply-To: <20160201175827.E51785@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20160131000408.N51785@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <63014.76.192.184.12.1454168056.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> <20160201175827.E51785@sola.nimnet.asn.au> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 08:20:41 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: "epilogue" script? From: "Valeri Galtsev" To: "Ian Smith" Cc: "Polytropon" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Reply-To: galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.el5.centos.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 14:20:50 -0000 On Mon, February 1, 2016 1:11 am, Ian Smith wrote: > On Sat, 30 Jan 2016 09:34:16 -0600 (CST), Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Sat, January 30, 2016 8:19 am, Ian Smith wrote: > [..] > > > We don't really know what Valeri wants to run, and whether it's one > or > > > more daemons, maybe including long-running background scripts, that > may > > > need start|stop|status control via service(8), or whether it's more > > > simply one or more one-off tasks to be run sometime after startup? > > > > It is rather simple thing which I need. I'm trying to set up openvpn, > and > > I need _after_ starting openvpn daemon to add tap0 interface to the > bridge > > then set IP on the bridge and on tap0 interface the same as that of > real > > interface which is member of this bridge. This is the only way I > managed > > to make openvpn really work (by trial and error). I'm kind of not > inclined > > to use openvpn's mechanism (which they seemingly have) to do it (it is > not > > a first time I spent this long setting up something on FreeBSD, but it > was > > the first time I spent this time... hm, not that productive. My > ignorance > > is to blame, still...) > > I know absolutely nothing about openvpn or tap interfaces so can't help > with that, except to suggest freebsd-net@ as the best place to ask. Thanks again, I will. I'm kind of puzzled by the need to set IP on all bridge members, whereas setting IP on the bridge itself should suffice. And I am kind of not able to overcome unrelated problem I create by adding physical interface to bridge: I have DHCP server on that same machine which (no matter whether DHCP server is jail or on host machine itself) gets blocked when I make physical interface member of a bridge, although it is my understanding that the bridge works on the same layer, so something is wrong with what I'm doing. Valeri > > cheers, Ian > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Feb 1 14:22:48 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFD77A9735F for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 14:22:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 655271132 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 14:22:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from zero-gravitas.local (no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u11EMfIg093567 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 14:22:42 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=infracaninophile.co.uk DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk u11EMfIg093567 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1454336562; bh=k4wG0rnVHKFHoEhgqVh8BLzzj81Oeuv113tXbhSIT/4=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; z=Subject:=20Re:=20Easiest=20way=20to=20watch=20Netflix=20in=20Free BSD?|To:=20freebsd-questions@freebsd.org|References:=20<56ABCDA2.5 0206@rawbw.com>=20<56AC3CCA.8040708@bananmonarki.se>=0D=0A=20<2016 0130125916.GB31860@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru>=0D=0A=20<56AEC438.40204 09@ShaneWare.Biz>=20<20160201133101.GA17977@neutralgood.org>|From: =20Matthew=20Seaman=20|Date:=20Mo n,=201=20Feb=202016=2014:22:35=20+0000|In-Reply-To:=20<20160201133 101.GA17977@neutralgood.org>; b=BX87K7W3FzbbQ7klJ0zoI6qn+qM7vspMTaKOaSAipR+AoI37SPT7ZyDcYZQMnrE0/ OK3m9iLY7rGPPN4Rv1FRYMUb+LfpAy0AdBro4Op87kCqvra1JWSkPMv/eOti9PGpZB ESFkYyMzyOkeVNdnRm82GAaFDBYlq7tApF47hwpg= X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged) claimed to be zero-gravitas.local Subject: Re: Easiest way to watch Netflix in FreeBSD? To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <56ABCDA2.50206@rawbw.com> <56AC3CCA.8040708@bananmonarki.se> <20160130125916.GB31860@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <56AEC438.4020409@ShaneWare.Biz> <20160201133101.GA17977@neutralgood.org> From: Matthew Seaman X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <56AF6A2B.2020107@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 14:22:35 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160201133101.GA17977@neutralgood.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="t5AORGjsoKovf42HlRrcKmS074ROW1ib2" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 14:22:48 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --t5AORGjsoKovf42HlRrcKmS074ROW1ib2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2016/02/01 13:31, kpneal@pobox.com wrote: > Netflix is a business. They use FreeBSD because it works well for them.= > If they have a problem on their end they pay to fix it and possibly get= > the changes pushed back up into the FreeBSD tree. Lots of companies do = the > exact same thing. That's a _good_ thing. Netflix employs a good number of FreeBSD developers directly and acitively pushes improvements they make into the FreeBSD sources. They have a now fairly famous 'zero delta' ideal -- ie. that they are using FreeBSD without any local modifications. Cheers, Matthew --t5AORGjsoKovf42HlRrcKmS074ROW1ib2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJWr2oxXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxOUYxNTRFQ0JGMTEyRTUwNTQ0RTNGMzAw MDUxM0YxMEUwQTlFNEU3AAoJEABRPxDgqeTnrpgP/2kWP3RVu13l38O+7zFjZTTc Z5uJxNW/1P/GQecY+TXY/Pw75qqqQL8NJyzk8oYCQxYOBFUBsv9tvhBr87uOwMfv lpZmBNPKmrgiuRYnk7c3YT9NYt/NpuQoNbs3TqwVxjn+nZ2bRjWIZ8LZU31OmAi5 WQl15xRQzno9VEPmX08EUAKsPPLrgJQG7ko4EWjq56MmQyf8/kV0W+e+OeX86Fvo uFaacYd8FeauRPtPAgVUL1upOlImmo06Jfh1ThWdXkXLGdBjDiNo7H5vYykxPPJ8 WQrb+SBsLcA5qCDvpZOyVE77Pc7dAghOEKJnhwUwH0AOHOrU/FT1fxKVLpxz1wEV HrmEh3jGTlxu4c6MG7SV0/cguRibjE6nSkiVULbmMiIj7IL0vVeOFOt1fwxWRwoa qzlvmKihVcX42JOyortpocxeiLmM/5P4uebT1vRd/vYlCyQrFy5GZJUWAJJiBJFD wq+XpTt9bme6lE87B7gMGgxPaB89H4TvUCWl2QP/JITi8Ut8DpAN8qQiQB6Pvc51 VSiMcRsj66+pHfFIhAfwYsCFzJlR9o2U2aQf2JeWoWnef3c/4Q4d+vDvTG8inDa7 jQmbB5aqMx8LPn0EmHu88JylzEiz+1D1RM1c/O91XyONQhOQfm21l0Ads054URWf T+ar8m9NTYZOElrUuf0R =gNfq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --t5AORGjsoKovf42HlRrcKmS074ROW1ib2-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Feb 1 14:25:54 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3418AA974C5 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 14:25:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from mail-wm0-x22a.google.com (mail-wm0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C104E1242 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 14:25:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: by mail-wm0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id r129so73088688wmr.0 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 06:25:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=khera.org; s=google11; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=EYWj+UUMdzhigFx2VPqqyxhx1VXJn0ip63Pm0+Xe+4o=; b=b/MGjGRcfiOVsujnEPJhKk2NHogeMzb1WoaBycejEXxxO2/FwYkvZAShi89uegoZOu NUhrzRpEYWNheurUb09mSsszWxzZ6cRie81XSKI6GpgYPjziAk6KFVRZwHecKvI7KrlZ fwi/Bl3fP9LvuFSira4dOJD1hY/FHu9MUV/8I= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=EYWj+UUMdzhigFx2VPqqyxhx1VXJn0ip63Pm0+Xe+4o=; b=ZvPzAa9WqYv9JR6dEqmNFeRQ+E8efVt/k0aMoNsCr82iPd4MFaOYVvjyZ7LoEfGCEZ HUH9THh1vLOz3zeFkSQvSS6rZ0ubLIlVi1/B3vUPr+dX5xGYZC0G6TUvPndTWx7q2Yjp bHSKDC6AiB+RvhJxKBV9Hm/0crXgWccUPPr20xZDCePGhinKWRpn3ZIVN2yQhVYrOgsa jGP293MTwXv+6p+s3G+rSWnrw/OF1VTTz5OtKxHWHoe3gb2CMuUxtTzxat9pZbav774G 09O3qKt8leooTU+8v2e4cZGw1opA2L1Kz8rQLCXPZd9QBwgUkZQveIvMPwRO8/FImN5+ JzEw== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORJljQ/lPsUKfujRn3uBf9EjJm9Bh2XQalU2E1ICelQdPnDqqcHFYIKB/6bOrAnPC0IdOIfTfQY5h3iLQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.28.13.213 with SMTP id 204mr11546423wmn.16.1454336750425; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 06:25:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.28.165.138 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 06:25:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 09:25:50 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: NFS unstable with high load on server From: Vick Khera To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 14:25:54 -0000 I have a handful of servers at my data center all running FreeBSD 10.2. On one of them I have a copy of the FreeBSD sources shared via NFS. When this server is running a large poudriere run re-building all the ports I need, the clients' NFS mounts become unstable. That is, the clients keep getting read failures. The interactive performance of the NFS server is just fine, however. The local file system is a ZFS mirror. What could be causing NFS to be unstable in this situation? Specifics: Server "lorax" FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE-p7 kernel locally compiled, with NFS server and ZFS as dynamic kernel modules. 16GB RAM, Xeon 3.1GHz quad processor. The directory /u/lorax1 a ZFS dataset on a mirrored pool, and is NFS exported via the ZFS exports file. I put the FreeBSD sources on this dataset and symlink to /usr/src. Client "bluefish" FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE-p5 kernel locally compiled, NFS client built in to kernel. 32GB RAM, Xeon 3.1GHz quad processor (basically same hardware but more RAM). The directory /n/lorax1 is NFS mounted from lorax via autofs. The NFS options are "intr,nolockd". /usr/src is symlinked to the sources in that NFS mount. What I observe: [lorax]~% cd /usr/src [lorax]src% svn status [lorax]src% w 9:12AM up 12 days, 19:19, 4 users, load averages: 4.43, 4.45, 3.61 USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT vivek pts/0 vick.int.kcilink.com 8:44AM - tmux: client (/tmp/ vivek pts/1 tmux(19747).%0 8:44AM 19 sed y%*+%pp%;s%[^_a vivek pts/2 tmux(19747).%1 8:56AM - w vivek pts/3 tmux(19747).%2 8:56AM - slogin bluefish-prv [lorax]src% pwd /u/lorax1/usr10/src So right now the load average is more than 1 per processor on lorax. I can quite easily run "svn status" on the source directory, and the interactive performance is pretty snappy for editing local files and navigating around the file system. On the client: [bluefish]~% cd /usr/src [bluefish]src% pwd /n/lorax1/usr10/src [bluefish]src% svn status svn: E070008: Can't read directory '/n/lorax1/usr10/src/contrib/sqlite3': Partial results are valid but processing is incomplete [bluefish]src% svn status svn: E070008: Can't read directory '/n/lorax1/usr10/src/lib/libfetch': Partial results are valid but processing is incomplete [bluefish]src% svn status svn: E070008: Can't read directory '/n/lorax1/usr10/src/release/picobsd/tinyware/msg': Partial results are valid but processing is incomplete [bluefish]src% w 9:14AM up 93 days, 23:55, 1 user, load averages: 0.10, 0.15, 0.15 USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT vivek pts/0 lorax-prv.kcilink.com 8:56AM - w [bluefish]src% df . Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on lorax-prv:/u/lorax1 932845181 6090910 926754271 1% /n/lorax1 What I see is more or less random failures to read the NFS volume. When the server is not so busy running poudriere builds, the client never has any failures. I also observe this kind of failure doing buildworld or installworld on the client when the server is busy -- I get strange random failures reading the files causing the build or install to fail. My workaround is to not do build/installs on client machines when the NFS server is busy doing large jobs like building all packages, but there is definitely something wrong here I'd like to fix. I observe this on all the local NFS clients. I rebooted the server before to try to clear this up but it did not fix it. Any help would be appreciated. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Feb 1 14:52:13 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D19E6A750DC for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 14:52:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x233.google.com (mail-wm0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CF80797 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 14:52:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x233.google.com with SMTP id l66so73989944wml.0 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 06:52:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=6NhsTGrjq6npot/nxQ+uHLiWfw0nSUaJMArdceAUmnI=; b=0rXFyYn36qamR9o4OlJ2DSZWxx1+EqGE/dG+Lk5m5DFJzb98ijZZsJFt6ihyzleRr6 1Mp/I9PAaeev8ofUfSYfQKmbK+fTVFKBUXLoY1XdxrjVHek+UfKE7B0/XUOQqjm40qmf T+5RqbrnkYBPYsCZETzGP9pQhcuERk8EbYphO7qhpEMBQvnB35Wp9haB1ML/DsztsklI jOX45e8gx5ghOKA/9GRJjILoO604A4ieGvd4gtXY6Es8RqejlklZxBTD9xZFnSbOaDq1 ZSuw0ffyLVM0/2qMm/ju+Ueh+SBsuj9HWQbTU0I45rstUw7nLQv8Ct4bHLw3BCaG4iL6 U/Hw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=6NhsTGrjq6npot/nxQ+uHLiWfw0nSUaJMArdceAUmnI=; b=U2zG3LOk7lYcbVFcAky0e6FShMIMvHmonFXCMKR2+QNGdDuAJbQFzqrLEtDIimPmNG 19PESJmN9LrhDv8qsIfJDdf/xo2tT2Q4Y20AsHJdtrzeIgrCe+IRnd2T32rwK/woa/Ts P6OEnZP8paZKEcAAa5WqilW6uy1hFBwWAXUrQ9apwZiLNs4wOKwHSO/CVfNMyDfErSmg vBA1+oWG8/MzSD8JwAb3Jl4v5grHg0nuGzXvIdrz2M+La7SP/Po2hxDqIuYE/fzieYRU Iw8wU8juayBe4yLJgBdF9FCpDvUwWMo2KDtbzATe9lJFkLAf1bG/o5jw1trErg355Aef Lt5A== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOR+s5ysL2Pze7oOuyAH3GOED2rGaruGu9EyvV9gnSx8AUmJKaCDx2MugHpVyCvWVo63C0hBuckTAUUsDQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.103.164 with SMTP id fx4mr23238790wjb.56.1454338331669; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 06:52:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.28.55.132 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 06:52:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <63014.76.192.184.12.1454168056.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> References: <20160131000408.N51785@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <63014.76.192.184.12.1454168056.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 14:52:11 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: "epilogue" script? From: krad To: galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu Cc: Ian Smith , Polytropon , FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 14:52:14 -0000 Have you looked at the cloned_interfaces and autobridge_* rc.conf options, they might give you what you need? On 30 January 2016 at 15:34, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Sat, January 30, 2016 8:19 am, Ian Smith wrote: > > In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 608, Issue 6, Message: 20 > > On Sat, 30 Jan 2016 11:59:55 +0100 Polytropon wrote: > > > On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 16:35:07 -0600 (CST), Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > > > Dear Experts, > > > > > > > > How does one create "epoligue" script in FreeBSD. By "epoligue" > > script > > > > script I mean here the script that is executed after everything > > described > > > > in /etc/rc.conf is done (services started, interfaces initialized > > etc.). I > > [..] > > > > > a) RC framework: rc.d > > [..] > > > See "man rc" and "man rcorder" for details. > > > > Sure, if installing new daemon processes, this is the way to go. > > > > OTOH, for scripts needing running just once at startup, and/or possibly > > once at shutdown: > > Thanks to everybody who answered, you answers were very instructive! And > special thanks to Mr Polytropon and Mr Smith! Being quite long on this > list I have noticed that after reading your posts my knowledge improves as > after reading a chapter of a good book on the subject. Which leads me to > realizing that that is exactly what I had to do a few years ago, when I > migrated servers to FreeBSD: read a good book, and there were several > recommended on this list some time ago, so this is what I'll do next (plus > man on all things you all have mentioned). > > > > > > b) rc.local and rc.shutdown.local > > > > > > Those files, located in /etc, are "real" shell scripts that will be > > > executed "quite late", but not at the lastest possible point. Here > > > is an example: > > > > > > Creating and/or trimming log files. > > > Starting syslogd. > > > No core dumps found. > > > Additional ABI support: linux. > > > Starting named. > > > Clearing /tmp (X related). > > > Starting local daemons: activity. <--- /etc/rc.local runnung > now! > > > Starting ntpd. > > > Starting dhcpd. > > > Starting cupsd. > > > Configuring syscons: keymap keyrate font8x16 font8x14 font8x8. > > > Starting sshd. > > > Starting cron. > > > Starting inetd. > > > > > > As you can see, there are other services started _after_ rc.local has > > > been run. This might cause a problem for you when you need those > > services > > > running. > > > > Yes. I was preparing to post a very similar segment, which also wrote > > something to stdout when /etc/rc.local was sourced - so thanks! > > > > > See from "man rc": > > > > > > The rc.local script contains commands which are pertinent only > > > to a specific site. Typically, the /usr/local/etc/rc.d/ mechanism > > > is used instead of rc.local these days but if you want to use > > rc.local, > > > it is still supported. In this case, it should source /etc/rc.conf > > > and contain additional custom startup code for your system. The > best > > > way to handle rc.local, however, is to separate it out into rc.d/ > > > style scripts and place them under /usr/local/etc/rc.d/. The > rc.conf > > > file contains the global system configuration information > referenced > > > by the startup scripts, while rc.conf.local contains the local > system > > > configuration. See rc.conf(5) for more information. > > > > > > So this might not be "stable". > > > > It's stable; been there since the dawn of time and isn't going away :) > > > > Valeri, picking up on the above, if you run, say: > > > > % rcorder /etc/rc.d/* /usr/local/etc/rc.d/* | less > > > > and find 'local', you'll see where /etc/rc.d/rc/local runs, and that's > > what runs (sources inline) /etc/rc.local on startup (or in reverse order > > on shutdown, /etc/rc.shutdown.local) > > > > You only need source /etc/rc.conf if using rc.conf variables of course. > > > > > c) /etc/rc hook > > > > Totally agree; don't go anywhere near there :) > > > > > > I'm left clueless. As Linux refugee I have a feeling that this is > > doable > > > > without a hack, like making init script, and having "sleep ..." in > it > > > > before payload. In Linux this is done using /etc/rc.d/rc.local which > > is > > > > executed _after_ everything else is done. > > > > > > As you can see, an rc.d style mechanism will probably be the best > > > solution here, except you are fully sure that the time when rc.local > > > is run you will be provided with everything you need. > > > > We don't really know what Valeri wants to run, and whether it's one or > > more daemons, maybe including long-running background scripts, that may > > need start|stop|status control via service(8), or whether it's more > > simply one or more one-off tasks to be run sometime after startup? > > It is rather simple thing which I need. I'm trying to set up openvpn, and > I need _after_ starting openvpn daemon to add tap0 interface to the bridge > then set IP on the bridge and on tap0 interface the same as that of real > interface which is member of this bridge. This is the only way I managed > to make openvpn really work (by trial and error). I'm kind of not inclined > to use openvpn's mechanism (which they seemingly have) to do it (it is not > a first time I spent this long setting up something on FreeBSD, but it was > the first time I spent this time... hm, not that productive. My ignorance > is to blame, still...) > > Thanks again, everybody. I'm set on right tracks, and should be able to > successfully finish what I'm doing now. > > Valeri > > > > > If the latter, there's nothing at all wrong with starting a script that > > runs in the background including sleep(1), so long as you don't have an > > inline sleep that would just pause the whole startup. Something like .. > > > > /etc/rc.local: (do not use exit or return, this runs within > /etc/rc) > > wait=20 > > ( sleep $wait # sleep 5 should usually be more than enough > > # perhaps wait for something or other to be running or exist? > > # do stuff, maybe including starting further bg jobs, whatever .. > > ) & > > echo "my rc.local stuff starts in $wait seconds" > > > > cheers, Ian > > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Valeri Galtsev > Sr System Administrator > Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics > Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics > University of Chicago > Phone: 773-702-4247 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Feb 2 06:11:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9599A985F1; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 06:11:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf0-x229.google.com (mail-lf0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C0911852; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 06:11:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf0-x229.google.com with SMTP id j78so41538814lfb.1; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 22:11:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=lZ3tdqE/YuX/cl1+JZKD2H6/zOzTPVplFBdq3hS6kIY=; b=e25KVCtvBKtYnLLvJdBHNbMe4shuXkxSCxbFlm/RSBW+7D285n1Mq9LjO+BX68sfN7 RXQjPHB7wgd84oCjGiXHAFYlWnSzOhHw/Yc7BQxL22RKOO1Blhcx4kUsgTf9jlhl1Bw9 rimj6pI6CZEiCnbHjZJvRtNiFd3Ta55Vwy0bLm8tM9SE+QnhNhc1pcgN7GFpquPUhqFv Avyk0TREjkfbCpXh83qO+EJhwOzDLWmkhcyKMBVAb+ljPKYehG7MAtqyiDlhJhKn77Iw MvUSOIgJU/kL4VjZRr4qAOeE5b0obwA6mzIU5Try/w+iKl+Txj2ngbyoPCPs4sqobtLj szWA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=lZ3tdqE/YuX/cl1+JZKD2H6/zOzTPVplFBdq3hS6kIY=; b=HMix4N0i7F4dlpTRVT5pfZiICs9BgWuSN66eU9Zd22CjGEEaUwGkpIQcrcTMuUoXHu /ksxs0WHkR90D+tAegir/oPmMiIgzMARFPvEl4cCaBug2vjEc6kZnXOEBSgJ4hAxgL9f cmTDwuM1EEpqfHv+vzljIQ3Go2leF6qng4KAlXb7u+NWkTFjS4l6/2+CCe8booRiJR0y UdZDgdVuJbRPJMDrJiGqX30iC1thtO+6psDOcczHXOafn6ycc9uapop1msBT0VPQsNZH fVz6T5M4qvr8qxlSBZl8msOuProuXMo4EKpI2ExgaUfKuZyvZ1/VwNfe4I1Cj2wUNKUl vakg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQJVxmSOEcb99LdAufXSnV+XG81QwAtZRBb/ANr7rClQpXC+PDeIQTuQ+lW8gZkXofWJL0SgLXy3nkdFw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.25.65.5 with SMTP id o5mr9101477lfa.38.1454393458239; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 22:10:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.25.89.10 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 22:10:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 07:10:58 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: NFS unstable with high load on server From: Ben Woods To: Vick Khera Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 06:11:00 -0000 On Monday, 1 February 2016, Vick Khera wrote: > I have a handful of servers at my data center all running FreeBSD 10.2. On > one of them I have a copy of the FreeBSD sources shared via NFS. When this > server is running a large poudriere run re-building all the ports I need, > the clients' NFS mounts become unstable. That is, the clients keep getting > read failures. The interactive performance of the NFS server is just fine, > however. The local file system is a ZFS mirror. > > What could be causing NFS to be unstable in this situation? > > Specifics: > > Server "lorax" FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE-p7 kernel locally compiled, with NFS > server and ZFS as dynamic kernel modules. 16GB RAM, Xeon 3.1GHz quad > processor. > > The directory /u/lorax1 a ZFS dataset on a mirrored pool, and is NFS > exported via the ZFS exports file. I put the FreeBSD sources on this > dataset and symlink to /usr/src. > > > Client "bluefish" FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE-p5 kernel locally compiled, NFS > client built in to kernel. 32GB RAM, Xeon 3.1GHz quad processor (basically > same hardware but more RAM). > > The directory /n/lorax1 is NFS mounted from lorax via autofs. The NFS > options are "intr,nolockd". /usr/src is symlinked to the sources in that > NFS mount. > > > What I observe: > > [lorax]~% cd /usr/src > [lorax]src% svn status > [lorax]src% w > 9:12AM up 12 days, 19:19, 4 users, load averages: 4.43, 4.45, 3.61 > USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT > vivek pts/0 vick.int.kcilink.com 8:44AM - tmux: client > (/tmp/ > vivek pts/1 tmux(19747).%0 8:44AM 19 sed > y%*+%pp%;s%[^_a > vivek pts/2 tmux(19747).%1 8:56AM - w > vivek pts/3 tmux(19747).%2 8:56AM - slogin > bluefish-prv > [lorax]src% pwd > /u/lorax1/usr10/src > > So right now the load average is more than 1 per processor on lorax. I can > quite easily run "svn status" on the source directory, and the interactive > performance is pretty snappy for editing local files and navigating around > the file system. > > > On the client: > > [bluefish]~% cd /usr/src > [bluefish]src% pwd > /n/lorax1/usr10/src > [bluefish]src% svn status > svn: E070008: Can't read directory '/n/lorax1/usr10/src/contrib/sqlite3': > Partial results are valid but processing is incomplete > [bluefish]src% svn status > svn: E070008: Can't read directory '/n/lorax1/usr10/src/lib/libfetch': > Partial results are valid but processing is incomplete > [bluefish]src% svn status > svn: E070008: Can't read directory > '/n/lorax1/usr10/src/release/picobsd/tinyware/msg': Partial results are > valid but processing is incomplete > [bluefish]src% w > 9:14AM up 93 days, 23:55, 1 user, load averages: 0.10, 0.15, 0.15 > USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT > vivek pts/0 lorax-prv.kcilink.com 8:56AM - w > [bluefish]src% df . > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > lorax-prv:/u/lorax1 932845181 6090910 926754271 1% /n/lorax1 > > > What I see is more or less random failures to read the NFS volume. When the > server is not so busy running poudriere builds, the client never has any > failures. > > I also observe this kind of failure doing buildworld or installworld on > the client when the server is busy -- I get strange random failures reading > the files causing the build or install to fail. > > My workaround is to not do build/installs on client machines when the NFS > server is busy doing large jobs like building all packages, but there is > definitely something wrong here I'd like to fix. I observe this on all the > local NFS clients. I rebooted the server before to try to clear this up but > it did not fix it. > > Any help would be appreciated. > I just wanted to point out that I am experiencing this exact same issue in my home setup. Performing an installworld from an NFS mount works perfectly, until I start running poudriere on the NFS server. Then I start getting NFS timeouts and the installworld fails. The NFS server is also using ZFS, but the NFS export in my case is being done via the ZFS property "sharenfs" (I am not using the /etc/exports file). I suspect this will boil down to a ZFS tuning issue, where poudriere and installworld are both stress testing the server. Both of these would obviously cause significant memory and CPU usage, and the "recently used" portion of the ARC to be constantly flushed as they access a large number of different files. It might be interesting if you could report the output of the heading lines (including memory and ARC details) from the "top" command before/after running poudriere and attempting the installworld. Regards, Ben -- -- From: Benjamin Woods woodsb02@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Feb 2 06:26:56 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10A4BA98B0F; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 06:26:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from spork@bway.net) Received: from smtp1.bway.net (smtp1.v6.bway.net [IPv6:2607:d300:1::27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7A511F32; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 06:26:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from spork@bway.net) Received: from frankentosh.sporklab.com (foon.sporktines.com [96.57.144.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: spork@bway.net) by smtp1.bway.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5A03395854; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 01:26:44 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=bway.net; s=mail; t=1454394404; bh=Z8V/1DQgUvKQRuYpDJCHcKXtgCNlOhVLAm7n9MeIdx8=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=fZZuftmuw9BQTXaIfbebFtTv3wqS2+m7DxHWT3aSfmXp5CGUdLuK64wWJ+/OTZpF+ nwNw60WiiGU4U/HFYhkvPjlXvqSYrpXCij3vHy9IRnqyibjQT4LM5OaPmbXU4uLFz2 wohu0XVppzkaAcvaHaTWHS0PifLRPxBdRnYzZy0w= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\)) Subject: Re: NFS unstable with high load on server From: Charles Sprickman In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 01:26:43 -0500 Cc: Vick Khera , freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <5EAD4A4A-211F-451E-A3B9-752DAC6D94B4@bway.net> References: To: Ben Woods X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 06:26:56 -0000 On Feb 2, 2016, at 1:10 AM, Ben Woods wrote: >=20 > On Monday, 1 February 2016, Vick Khera wrote: >=20 >> I have a handful of servers at my data center all running FreeBSD = 10.2. On >> one of them I have a copy of the FreeBSD sources shared via NFS. When = this >> server is running a large poudriere run re-building all the ports I = need, >> the clients' NFS mounts become unstable. That is, the clients keep = getting >> read failures. The interactive performance of the NFS server is just = fine, >> however. The local file system is a ZFS mirror. >>=20 >> What could be causing NFS to be unstable in this situation? >>=20 >> Specifics: >>=20 >> Server "lorax" FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE-p7 kernel locally compiled, with = NFS >> server and ZFS as dynamic kernel modules. 16GB RAM, Xeon 3.1GHz quad >> processor. >>=20 >> The directory /u/lorax1 a ZFS dataset on a mirrored pool, and is NFS >> exported via the ZFS exports file. I put the FreeBSD sources on this >> dataset and symlink to /usr/src. >>=20 >>=20 >> Client "bluefish" FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE-p5 kernel locally compiled, = NFS >> client built in to kernel. 32GB RAM, Xeon 3.1GHz quad processor = (basically >> same hardware but more RAM). >>=20 >> The directory /n/lorax1 is NFS mounted from lorax via autofs. The NFS >> options are "intr,nolockd". /usr/src is symlinked to the sources in = that >> NFS mount. >>=20 >>=20 >> What I observe: >>=20 >> [lorax]~% cd /usr/src >> [lorax]src% svn status >> [lorax]src% w >> 9:12AM up 12 days, 19:19, 4 users, load averages: 4.43, 4.45, 3.61 >> USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT >> vivek pts/0 vick.int.kcilink.com 8:44AM - tmux: = client >> (/tmp/ >> vivek pts/1 tmux(19747).%0 8:44AM 19 sed >> y%*+%pp%;s%[^_a >> vivek pts/2 tmux(19747).%1 8:56AM - w >> vivek pts/3 tmux(19747).%2 8:56AM - slogin >> bluefish-prv >> [lorax]src% pwd >> /u/lorax1/usr10/src >>=20 >> So right now the load average is more than 1 per processor on lorax. = I can >> quite easily run "svn status" on the source directory, and the = interactive >> performance is pretty snappy for editing local files and navigating = around >> the file system. >>=20 >>=20 >> On the client: >>=20 >> [bluefish]~% cd /usr/src >> [bluefish]src% pwd >> /n/lorax1/usr10/src >> [bluefish]src% svn status >> svn: E070008: Can't read directory = '/n/lorax1/usr10/src/contrib/sqlite3': >> Partial results are valid but processing is incomplete >> [bluefish]src% svn status >> svn: E070008: Can't read directory = '/n/lorax1/usr10/src/lib/libfetch': >> Partial results are valid but processing is incomplete >> [bluefish]src% svn status >> svn: E070008: Can't read directory >> '/n/lorax1/usr10/src/release/picobsd/tinyware/msg': Partial results = are >> valid but processing is incomplete >> [bluefish]src% w >> 9:14AM up 93 days, 23:55, 1 user, load averages: 0.10, 0.15, 0.15 >> USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT >> vivek pts/0 lorax-prv.kcilink.com 8:56AM - w >> [bluefish]src% df . >> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on >> lorax-prv:/u/lorax1 932845181 6090910 926754271 1% /n/lorax1 >>=20 >>=20 >> What I see is more or less random failures to read the NFS volume. = When the >> server is not so busy running poudriere builds, the client never has = any >> failures. >>=20 >> I also observe this kind of failure doing buildworld or installworld = on >> the client when the server is busy -- I get strange random failures = reading >> the files causing the build or install to fail. >>=20 >> My workaround is to not do build/installs on client machines when the = NFS >> server is busy doing large jobs like building all packages, but there = is >> definitely something wrong here I'd like to fix. I observe this on = all the >> local NFS clients. I rebooted the server before to try to clear this = up but >> it did not fix it. >>=20 >> Any help would be appreciated. >>=20 >=20 > I just wanted to point out that I am experiencing this exact same = issue in > my home setup. >=20 > Performing an installworld from an NFS mount works perfectly, until I = start > running poudriere on the NFS server. Then I start getting NFS timeouts = and > the installworld fails. >=20 > The NFS server is also using ZFS, but the NFS export in my case is = being > done via the ZFS property "sharenfs" (I am not using the /etc/exports = file). Me three. I=E2=80=99m actually updating a small group of servers now = and started=20 blowing up my installworlds by trying to do some poudriere builds at the = same=20 time. Very repeatable. Of note, I=E2=80=99m on 9.3, and saw this on = 8.4 as well. If I=20 track down the client-side failures, it=E2=80=99s always =E2=80=9Cpermissi= on denied=E2=80=9D. Thanks, Charles >=20 > I suspect this will boil down to a ZFS tuning issue, where poudriere = and > installworld are both stress testing the server. Both of these would > obviously cause significant memory and CPU usage, and the "recently = used" > portion of the ARC to be constantly flushed as they access a large = number > of different files. >=20 > It might be interesting if you could report the output of the heading = lines > (including memory and ARC details) from the "top" command before/after > running poudriere and attempting the installworld. >=20 > Regards, > Ben >=20 >=20 > --=20 >=20 > -- > From: Benjamin Woods > woodsb02@gmail.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Feb 2 14:53:36 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79691A9813C for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 14:53:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48941119 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 14:53:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from kabini1.local (dynamic-216-186-244-25.knology.net [216.186.244.25] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id u12ErWJC022194 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 08:53:33 -0600 Subject: Re: NFS unstable with high load on server To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: "William A. Mahaffey III" Message-ID: <56B0C2EC.2090706@hiwaay.net> Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 08:59:02 -0553.75 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 14:53:36 -0000 On 02/01/16 08:32, Vick Khera wrote: > I have a handful of servers at my data center all running FreeBSD 10.2. On > one of them I have a copy of the FreeBSD sources shared via NFS. When this > server is running a large poudriere run re-building all the ports I need, > the clients' NFS mounts become unstable. That is, the clients keep getting > read failures. The interactive performance of the NFS server is just fine, > however. The local file system is a ZFS mirror. > > What could be causing NFS to be unstable in this situation? > > Specifics: > > Server "lorax" FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE-p7 kernel locally compiled, with NFS > server and ZFS as dynamic kernel modules. 16GB RAM, Xeon 3.1GHz quad > processor. > > The directory /u/lorax1 a ZFS dataset on a mirrored pool, and is NFS > exported via the ZFS exports file. I put the FreeBSD sources on this > dataset and symlink to /usr/src. > > > Client "bluefish" FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE-p5 kernel locally compiled, NFS > client built in to kernel. 32GB RAM, Xeon 3.1GHz quad processor (basically > same hardware but more RAM). > > The directory /n/lorax1 is NFS mounted from lorax via autofs. The NFS > options are "intr,nolockd". /usr/src is symlinked to the sources in that > NFS mount. > > > What I observe: > > [lorax]~% cd /usr/src > [lorax]src% svn status > [lorax]src% w > 9:12AM up 12 days, 19:19, 4 users, load averages: 4.43, 4.45, 3.61 > USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT > vivek pts/0 vick.int.kcilink.com 8:44AM - tmux: client > (/tmp/ > vivek pts/1 tmux(19747).%0 8:44AM 19 sed > y%*+%pp%;s%[^_a > vivek pts/2 tmux(19747).%1 8:56AM - w > vivek pts/3 tmux(19747).%2 8:56AM - slogin > bluefish-prv > [lorax]src% pwd > /u/lorax1/usr10/src > > So right now the load average is more than 1 per processor on lorax. I can > quite easily run "svn status" on the source directory, and the interactive > performance is pretty snappy for editing local files and navigating around > the file system. > > > On the client: > > [bluefish]~% cd /usr/src > [bluefish]src% pwd > /n/lorax1/usr10/src > [bluefish]src% svn status > svn: E070008: Can't read directory '/n/lorax1/usr10/src/contrib/sqlite3': > Partial results are valid but processing is incomplete > [bluefish]src% svn status > svn: E070008: Can't read directory '/n/lorax1/usr10/src/lib/libfetch': > Partial results are valid but processing is incomplete > [bluefish]src% svn status > svn: E070008: Can't read directory > '/n/lorax1/usr10/src/release/picobsd/tinyware/msg': Partial results are > valid but processing is incomplete > [bluefish]src% w > 9:14AM up 93 days, 23:55, 1 user, load averages: 0.10, 0.15, 0.15 > USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT > vivek pts/0 lorax-prv.kcilink.com 8:56AM - w > [bluefish]src% df . > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > lorax-prv:/u/lorax1 932845181 6090910 926754271 1% /n/lorax1 > > > What I see is more or less random failures to read the NFS volume. When the > server is not so busy running poudriere builds, the client never has any > failures. > > I also observe this kind of failure doing buildworld or installworld on > the client when the server is busy -- I get strange random failures reading > the files causing the build or install to fail. > > My workaround is to not do build/installs on client machines when the NFS > server is busy doing large jobs like building all packages, but there is > definitely something wrong here I'd like to fix. I observe this on all the > local NFS clients. I rebooted the server before to try to clear this up but > it did not fix it. > > Any help would be appreciated. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I notice similar issues. I have some in-house code that I native-recompile nightly under a FreeBSD 9.3R box running a 8-HDD-unmirrored-pool-ZFS & across the LAN on a Linux box w/ the Intel compiler suite. I also do across-the-LAN nightly backups. The across-the-LAN compiles & backups both use NFS to access other boxen on the LAN, notably including the dev-box doing the native-compile under FreeBSD 9.3R. If these processes overlap (too much/at all), the native compiles often fail and/or the backups barf. I thought it might be a NFS/ZFS issue. Earlier boxen didn't use ZFS, they were Linux or SGI (snif), & they bogged down (mightily) if the processes overlapped, but they did finish cleanly. -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Feb 2 15:48:54 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D52F8A975C2 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 15:48:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vrwmiller@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x232.google.com (mail-wm0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7134CD1 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 15:48:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vrwmiller@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x232.google.com with SMTP id l66so29170958wml.0 for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 07:48:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=k/rhzfR/29xvXgnH1JBzzRtE2tTMJTgwOrAY9iHb7g4=; b=Xdn9iuNADbWJrjzOWHvPGPqLzB75siepx2uozV2f4lyRFTxpjS/fgYuXADYY/S4hof vSSruXg/aIBJMPmSruVXF0EgalxquhRnzlv5l7hqRVKodXV7JvflxUwC/qeDBA2GoX+m Eol/0N2blJn9FdHBYZg178mh3hRJvVUAs1VuAlKd6x37WSNmFAlXZNZ9Kv2X+ZfZbWIL I3J1c+25+U7mRCv4yz2Gs11ueQa4PO74e8Aa63Q8rOE0VyU80kcuq1KyYV9hyE2WpUbW L9goB9jZiCxToDBLFsPTmBNlRyirmha3KwtyWg5j8WURyreyNovIlymQPNOhvyqlugWo Wv8g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from :to:content-type; bh=k/rhzfR/29xvXgnH1JBzzRtE2tTMJTgwOrAY9iHb7g4=; b=EQoZaBF3n9nr+poW5YdBGzQ5mC6oovUnBgiLx/fv/GeZtUSxvNVTS/3kt6T2/cPsl8 SceCLEV1yfqghXh/U4pa5yJOyYa7lGqRShIXCM7zhAD2xTT2UKw7uLdrqyzt0DQWAQfg RXIVRMGj+oU0JyW5uTVG2WIsuS3Gd1AghAl+gzYmODPqGmDEGVD5Yxtiemn3uqJXjQh8 lvtrTq9qJo1Yw1mpBaNjxY3C+gWkTOW92KdXDQ+6c+EVYNro4WNkV4rZ2d1DH3+f+ehe iSuPCV/4eLkixNvuyzuLwlFt6uiGbdHxNNa6BjXwDpgoaF91tu5WhsADA+7Dfi54INyy DsJw== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQ+nyXhszid8k1LntuMF+p10XHe3MyFaRWf5ZnX+DjCDJ5HzyFuBsduzGeVCGfAAoga/5HDH/Mvs1JhIA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.192.71 with SMTP id he7mr34483889wjc.82.1454428132931; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 07:48:52 -0800 (PST) Sender: vrwmiller@gmail.com Received: by 10.194.142.203 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 07:48:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 10:48:52 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: wftQfsFAhhTo2nvSqT9dqknMseE Message-ID: Subject: Heimdal Kerberos Installed? From: Rick Miller To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 15:48:55 -0000 Hi all, I've discovered kerberos binaries in /usr/bin and /usr/sbin that had been presumed not installed as the build system utilizes NO_KERBEROS=YES in make.conf that built the resulting distribution based on the releng/10.0 branch. It had been presumed that kerberos bits would not be included outside of /usr/local where security/krb5 is being installed. Consider that /usr/bin and /usr/sbin contain binaries for kadmin, kpasswd, kinit, klist, etc while /usr/sbin/ktutil is also present. Additionally, ldd reports these binaries linking against /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.11 vs. /usr/local/lib/libkrb5.so.3.3 installed by security/krb5. Conversely, the kerberos bits install in /usr/local do link against the appropriate libraries. The problem is that it appears Heimdal Kerberos appears to be installed despite the presence of NO_KERBEROS=YES in make.conf. Are there base kerberos bits that do get installed regardless of the existence of this knob? Is there an expectation that this knob notation (as opposed to WITHOUT_KERBEROS) works with releng/10.0? -- Take care Rick Miller From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Feb 2 15:53:55 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB5CAA97A1D for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 15:53:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from emily.forsyth@swri.org) Received: from esg256-3.itc.swri.org (esg256-3.itc.swri.edu [129.162.232.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 750B778E for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 15:53:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from emily.forsyth@swri.org) Received: from smtp.swri.org (MBX260.adm.swri.edu [129.162.29.125]) by esg256-3.itc.swri.org (8.15.0.59/8.15.0.59) with ESMTPS id u12FRKBG013569 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 09:27:20 -0600 Received: from MBX256.adm.swri.edu (129.162.26.125) by MBX260.adm.swri.edu (129.162.29.125) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1130.7; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 09:27:20 -0600 Received: from MBX256.adm.swri.edu ([129.162.26.125]) by MBX256.adm.swri.edu ([129.162.26.125]) with mapi id 15.00.1130.005; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 09:27:20 -0600 From: "Forsyth, Emily B." To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Index Thread-Topic: Index Thread-Index: AdFdz9Nz0YX5skPIQZ6IfU310wPFWQ== Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 15:27:19 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [129.162.26.94] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2016-02-02_10:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=inbound_policy_notspam policy=inbound_policy score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=-40 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1601100000 definitions=main-1602020269 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 15:53:55 -0000 Very new to DocBook5 and the language used. I'm creating a set of document= s and want to include an Index, but trying to figure out the indexing metho= d, I'm not having very much luck. Can someone please guide me? Thank you, Emily Forsyth Fluids & Machinery Engineering Department Propulsion & Energy Machinery Southwest Research Institute Tel: 210.522.2045 Email: emily.forsyth@swri.org From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Feb 2 15:55:05 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24245A97B7B for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 15:55:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1878930 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 15:55:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-115-239.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.115.239]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D08F33D0C8; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 16:54:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id u12FssB0002613; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 16:54:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 16:54:54 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Rick Miller Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Heimdal Kerberos Installed? Message-Id: <20160202165454.d9b6246e.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 15:55:05 -0000 On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 10:48:52 -0500, Rick Miller wrote: > Hi all, > > I've discovered kerberos binaries in /usr/bin and /usr/sbin that had been > presumed not installed as the build system utilizes NO_KERBEROS=YES in > make.conf that built the resulting distribution based on the releng/10.0 > branch. It had been presumed that kerberos bits would not be included > outside of /usr/local where security/krb5 is being installed. > [...] > The problem is that it appears Heimdal Kerberos appears to be installed > despite the presence of NO_KERBEROS=YES in make.conf. Are there base > kerberos bits that do get installed regardless of the existence of this > knob? Is there an expectation that this knob notation (as opposed to > WITHOUT_KERBEROS) works with releng/10.0? Did you check /etc/src.conf settings as well? From "man src.conf": WITHOUT_KERBEROS Set this if you do not want to build Kerberos 5 (KTH Heimdal). When set, it also enforces the following options: WITHOUT_GSSAPI (can be overridden with WITH_GSSAPI) WITHOUT_KERBEROS_SUPPORT WITHOUT_KERBEROS_SUPPORT Set to build some programs without Kerberos support, like cvs(1), ssh(1), telnet(1), sshd(8), and telnetd(8). Also see WITHOUT_CRYPT and WITHOUT_OPENSSL entries in that file. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Feb 2 16:54:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48C76A9945B for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 16:54:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com (mail-wm0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E01341247 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 16:54:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id 128so127472665wmz.1 for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 08:54:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=khera.org; s=google11; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Kxws9l3Ls0A5GZZElCZVoal4wxRT+0e9er0DV/3c01s=; b=fsahZJTzD10qsbWfuuI2ynYYpHPnrnfbYRwVsBEjw4fPTW3iwOMyTCl+EpeHm9p3Tn Rmxuug5VI94JtTl0wigsTBInj2pZRkyZCDtrfBnAkIV6v1wMrEqSGPinARyfZQM07TiW Y9FGhpG8ihn3lnF6XhrB8X6HN77J9yofayKtY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Kxws9l3Ls0A5GZZElCZVoal4wxRT+0e9er0DV/3c01s=; b=m/ikSlOp015rEIc5WoinXhwA0VBv9VzcCAngx4y8C5LH4wufVEm+0wogwRQoD2dzka yfRMe9r7+5XLFjiY3OJ/Q6UlfXwCPiBk4faRdhWcI2OyHup4hfW3YTfYcvhvDRGSyZTE HFF+1Gw7dMj4WuBqt/LWLRUBsB7A/lAazRepfFfB8Faw43g+YyDxqiJIxRrfydEmuQLJ LJpNufaVkVIv9HU/Ak3gBPnVQFDLgWeaJpQNAciOoe+HlcfTN27z0uniMuCce7m7MKEr qd566XMd+FaR3yUTxwmPVYluRP/laAnryP1e7cbjJOcpGETBdrFfKiyyn+cmjWTklVnN 660Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSfUuABMDyww2mV+bZA38ayYnzRLa0KCXxHQHMW4r+zH7MFwNCaAi9CiYZVl+3jvKWI/qsZ9P+g2c07Sg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.176.170 with SMTP id cj10mr29918885wjc.165.1454432086958; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 08:54:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.28.165.138 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 08:54:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5EAD4A4A-211F-451E-A3B9-752DAC6D94B4@bway.net> References: <5EAD4A4A-211F-451E-A3B9-752DAC6D94B4@bway.net> Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 11:54:46 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: NFS unstable with high load on server From: Vick Khera To: Charles Sprickman Cc: Ben Woods , freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 16:54:49 -0000 On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote: > Me three. I=E2=80=99m actually updating a small group of servers now and= started > blowing up my installworlds by trying to do some poudriere builds at the > same > time. Very repeatable. Of note, I=E2=80=99m on 9.3, and saw this on 8.4= as > well. If I > track down the client-side failures, it=E2=80=99s always =E2=80=9Cpermiss= ion denied=E2=80=9D. > Thanks for confirming this behavior. It is distressing to me that it happens at all. It must be some bad race condition somewhere, and unfortunately having a non-deterministic NFS server makes is unsuitable for production use. This is a problem for me since everything I have is FreeBSD... I will file a bug ticket, since I'm pretty sure at this point it is not something special with my environment. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Feb 2 17:27:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 740D5A980F8 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 17:27:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com (mail-wm0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E2627F2 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 17:27:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: by mail-wm0-x230.google.com with SMTP id 128so128917443wmz.1 for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 09:27:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=khera.org; s=google11; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ygD6SgWAPKQ0HOdGob+8iOMHzoUaC0/DrKTfItoM2c0=; b=ERfXxqzvzxFXVADOwRrn2VgFvf4dCIomC+ksCuX3UtPpNwkDrM7okWBJ1O6JA23NaH ix8BRSyWUpDCEoE5AVkCFR/h9bqH4JKJ6Sw172goryqtxnrPT4tf3A6r0dRn76sA1JKM fcfLDxezgpa5Ufl/+6AjnQGUzj4tuXSKOTtWM= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ygD6SgWAPKQ0HOdGob+8iOMHzoUaC0/DrKTfItoM2c0=; b=kkcntALIJNjEefQd65IkNt/bwTY9Qr3XTy648iktBxK0mG35gPIwYWLXYUoNGEuQbp nIEjdpnmEOkfSWSLq/87OLY6OngHtxwPErXXXGdH4nOCudQRD+0e9RlKE2+Gr4YDGNle s0EkJ/pPDfFeZGv1zVOHi1Dq5tHtezS6ZRMOQLJMrw3X3unokR1goljyhjCg1/3yrGb7 abuBtnhGjWRjNudwcOSsT1+NSz86yDfvfgoHLVa4R+gclyy3m5QkEQDkqN1VgcwnlBtl irVlbXYUNOgVGu03BKJdCLzz+vS71ZJ/W4JKjqjLjngqeOdo6j2bUEjuW+zdimlsJJcD i32w== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQri17xK2N6FKquTXRX93uEwNVUS3Ut5AUPNQxo0/XGL+qkA9nf+zYVEOrCzAb4Kg0PLFq0RhRrlMsvgA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.28.13.213 with SMTP id 204mr18387229wmn.16.1454434039435; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 09:27:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.28.165.138 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 09:27:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <5EAD4A4A-211F-451E-A3B9-752DAC6D94B4@bway.net> Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 12:27:19 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: NFS unstable with high load on server From: Vick Khera To: Charles Sprickman Cc: Ben Woods , freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 17:27:21 -0000 On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Vick Khera wrote: > I will file a bug ticket, since I'm pretty sure at this point it is not > something special with my environment. > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206855 in case anyone wishes to file a "me too" on the ticket or has any ideas on how to fix it. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Feb 2 18:48:35 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1AE5A99F80; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 18:48:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (unknown [IPv6:2602:304:b010:ef20::f2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gw.catspoiler.org", Issuer "gw.catspoiler.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 887301BD4; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 18:48:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u12ImDES067799; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 10:48:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201602021848.u12ImDES067799@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 10:48:13 -0800 (PST) From: Don Lewis Subject: Re: NFS unstable with high load on server To: spork@bway.net cc: woodsb02@gmail.com, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, vivek@khera.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <5EAD4A4A-211F-451E-A3B9-752DAC6D94B4@bway.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=iso-8859-13 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 18:48:35 -0000 On 2 Feb, Charles Sprickman wrote: > On Feb 2, 2016, at 1:10 AM, Ben Woods wrote: >> >> On Monday, 1 February 2016, Vick Khera wrote: >> >>> I have a handful of servers at my data center all running FreeBSD 10.2. On >>> one of them I have a copy of the FreeBSD sources shared via NFS. When this >>> server is running a large poudriere run re-building all the ports I need, >>> the clients' NFS mounts become unstable. That is, the clients keep getting >>> read failures. The interactive performance of the NFS server is just fine, >>> however. The local file system is a ZFS mirror. >>> >>> What could be causing NFS to be unstable in this situation? >>> >>> Specifics: >>> >>> Server "lorax" FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE-p7 kernel locally compiled, with NFS >>> server and ZFS as dynamic kernel modules. 16GB RAM, Xeon 3.1GHz quad >>> processor. >>> >>> The directory /u/lorax1 a ZFS dataset on a mirrored pool, and is NFS >>> exported via the ZFS exports file. I put the FreeBSD sources on this >>> dataset and symlink to /usr/src. >>> >>> >>> Client "bluefish" FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE-p5 kernel locally compiled, NFS >>> client built in to kernel. 32GB RAM, Xeon 3.1GHz quad processor (basically >>> same hardware but more RAM). >>> >>> The directory /n/lorax1 is NFS mounted from lorax via autofs. The NFS >>> options are "intr,nolockd". /usr/src is symlinked to the sources in that >>> NFS mount. >>> >>> >>> What I observe: >>> >>> [lorax]~% cd /usr/src >>> [lorax]src% svn status >>> [lorax]src% w >>> 9:12AM up 12 days, 19:19, 4 users, load averages: 4.43, 4.45, 3.61 >>> USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT >>> vivek pts/0 vick.int.kcilink.com 8:44AM - tmux: client >>> (/tmp/ >>> vivek pts/1 tmux(19747).%0 8:44AM 19 sed >>> y%*+%pp%;s%[^_a >>> vivek pts/2 tmux(19747).%1 8:56AM - w >>> vivek pts/3 tmux(19747).%2 8:56AM - slogin >>> bluefish-prv >>> [lorax]src% pwd >>> /u/lorax1/usr10/src >>> >>> So right now the load average is more than 1 per processor on lorax. I can >>> quite easily run "svn status" on the source directory, and the interactive >>> performance is pretty snappy for editing local files and navigating around >>> the file system. >>> >>> >>> On the client: >>> >>> [bluefish]~% cd /usr/src >>> [bluefish]src% pwd >>> /n/lorax1/usr10/src >>> [bluefish]src% svn status >>> svn: E070008: Can't read directory '/n/lorax1/usr10/src/contrib/sqlite3': >>> Partial results are valid but processing is incomplete >>> [bluefish]src% svn status >>> svn: E070008: Can't read directory '/n/lorax1/usr10/src/lib/libfetch': >>> Partial results are valid but processing is incomplete >>> [bluefish]src% svn status >>> svn: E070008: Can't read directory >>> '/n/lorax1/usr10/src/release/picobsd/tinyware/msg': Partial results are >>> valid but processing is incomplete >>> [bluefish]src% w >>> 9:14AM up 93 days, 23:55, 1 user, load averages: 0.10, 0.15, 0.15 >>> USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT >>> vivek pts/0 lorax-prv.kcilink.com 8:56AM - w >>> [bluefish]src% df . >>> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on >>> lorax-prv:/u/lorax1 932845181 6090910 926754271 1% /n/lorax1 >>> >>> >>> What I see is more or less random failures to read the NFS volume. When the >>> server is not so busy running poudriere builds, the client never has any >>> failures. >>> >>> I also observe this kind of failure doing buildworld or installworld on >>> the client when the server is busy -- I get strange random failures reading >>> the files causing the build or install to fail. >>> >>> My workaround is to not do build/installs on client machines when the NFS >>> server is busy doing large jobs like building all packages, but there is >>> definitely something wrong here I'd like to fix. I observe this on all the >>> local NFS clients. I rebooted the server before to try to clear this up but >>> it did not fix it. >>> >>> Any help would be appreciated. >>> >> >> I just wanted to point out that I am experiencing this exact same issue in >> my home setup. >> >> Performing an installworld from an NFS mount works perfectly, until I start >> running poudriere on the NFS server. Then I start getting NFS timeouts and >> the installworld fails. >> >> The NFS server is also using ZFS, but the NFS export in my case is being >> done via the ZFS property "sharenfs" (I am not using the /etc/exports file). > > Me three. Iÿm actually updating a small group of servers now and started > blowing up my installworlds by trying to do some poudriere builds at the same > time. Very repeatable. Of note, Iÿm on 9.3, and saw this on 8.4 as well. If I > track down the client-side failures, itÿs always Žpermission denied¡. That sort of sounds like the problem that was fixed in HEAD with r241561 and r241568. It was merged to 9-STABLE before 9.3-RELEASE. Try adding the -S option to mountd_flags. I have no idea why that isn't the default. When poudriere is running, it frequently mounts and unmounts filesystems. When this happens, mount(8) and umount(8) notify mountd to update the exports list. This is not done atomically so NFS transactions can fail while the mountd updates the export list. The fix mentioned above pauses the nfsd threads while the export list update is in progress to prevent the problem. I don't know how this works with ZFS sharenfs, though. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Feb 2 19:01:06 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2361AA98452 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 19:01:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vrwmiller@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-x231.google.com (mail-ob0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED7A2323 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 19:01:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vrwmiller@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ob0-x231.google.com with SMTP id ba1so159362022obb.3 for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 11:01:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=x4mzTvn21SA+nVOhN+8Zlw5wwAgxFOX49Yv4ptwxMb8=; b=LzKLk8+utIBpkgHZXQOUg0GKQuY4FAUAUuwabakyjpMy3D0VrcpDFU7C7sAd+4GaoU L1IAvIqPq5fQnnBB7iReh5wODmSkBYaME+sJbLy+IbZ9e6vFV20O5ngOfzPd8rvjmUmq metro9rx5fQDZWSjjNhoClMzhhrqZ8fphbDVlkp93Ag0dLr8DNfRipSSokNdPgcf5k4U LX1ml4+pK6kbWylwPj5G9gAxB2Qp6NaMuoZ+ktkcfBiD1eYZaUFyWCLha3wcDw0NV1j1 ZYebn8bEci8bXR060dgYPRyNWKEAqWJp6+/qGZXSgkj+4w8/GmntSHHP9klnCQ8nmX7j No2Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=x4mzTvn21SA+nVOhN+8Zlw5wwAgxFOX49Yv4ptwxMb8=; b=Md7SHaLtLD+Db57YdC1OwYeXrj3aWRk1b19dBN+DPXUSi7qSIoyvSyaDLiI+JRtfb+ jBDhqIaNbP81QE+6qTYi+ITyvM7sOJra1XnnWEtHEMTdVhDTnVON+B58zg27PKp1PIja gfdPfS/AAKtbDL9T3dnotHw80vpCdNM6nErXYrcj+44JzyjwOYCn+ckHTIG74qkk7xR/ C9ZyTlD35Pri6LtqMjKwp13i0V3DDNeNSKVwb/3tLsJ9ObBEyqE3rhS9tR7n6Odx1TSx /TY2jtZd8A0Ap1d+mG7xbYXNgVQclT/0l2xLMoubjIjSCszoKfM4l+DxrsCh3NPrMSMK x/Qg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORaxkxP5nrKyW+6jDR9vRn49+mNimIkhgl1XPpHnjoWsQ6NpuGo6+yISI/q8tJ7JO7BDL7S1eC4WS5IQQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.79.200 with SMTP id l8mr26126109obx.18.1454439663008; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 11:01:03 -0800 (PST) Sender: vrwmiller@gmail.com Received: by 10.202.170.77 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 11:01:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20160202165454.d9b6246e.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20160202165454.d9b6246e.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 14:01:02 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: qjCG-H71q5yE2U7xoLFxWrZWmpM Message-ID: Subject: Re: Heimdal Kerberos Installed? From: Rick Miller To: Polytropon Cc: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 19:01:06 -0000 On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Polytropon wrote: > On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 10:48:52 -0500, Rick Miller wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I've discovered kerberos binaries in /usr/bin and /usr/sbin that had been > > presumed not installed as the build system utilizes NO_KERBEROS=YES in > > make.conf that built the resulting distribution based on the releng/10.0 > > branch. It had been presumed that kerberos bits would not be included > > outside of /usr/local where security/krb5 is being installed. > > [...] > > The problem is that it appears Heimdal Kerberos appears to be installed > > despite the presence of NO_KERBEROS=YES in make.conf. Are there base > > kerberos bits that do get installed regardless of the existence of this > > knob? Is there an expectation that this knob notation (as opposed to > > WITHOUT_KERBEROS) works with releng/10.0? > > Did you check /etc/src.conf settings as well? From "man src.conf": > > WITHOUT_KERBEROS > Set this if you do not want to build Kerberos 5 (KTH Heimdal). > When set, it also enforces the following options: > > WITHOUT_GSSAPI (can be overridden with WITH_GSSAPI) > WITHOUT_KERBEROS_SUPPORT > > WITHOUT_KERBEROS_SUPPORT > Set to build some programs without Kerberos support, like > cvs(1), > ssh(1), telnet(1), sshd(8), and telnetd(8). > > Also see WITHOUT_CRYPT and WITHOUT_OPENSSL entries in that file. I had not checked src.conf(5). Thanks for the tip. Based on src.con(5), WITHOUT_KERBEROS enforces WITHOUT_KERBEROS_SUPPORT thus implying the necessity to install OpenSSH and friends via Ports/pkg w/ Kerberos support compiled in to obtain that functionality, but with MIT Krb. Is this an accurate assumption? -- Take care Rick Miller From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Feb 2 22:41:35 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B8CA9874C; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 22:41:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) Received: from esa-jnhn.mail.uoguelph.ca (esa-jnhn.mail.uoguelph.ca [131.104.91.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82B621FE; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 22:41:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:2F9y7hG1+BJyMDhwVapMAJ1GYnF86YWxBRYc798ds5kLTJ75os2wAkXT6L1XgUPTWs2DsrQf27WQ6vyrATdIyK3CmU5BWaQEbwUCh8QSkl5oK+++Imq/EsTXaTcnFt9JTl5v8iLzG0FUHMHjew+a+SXqvnYsExnyfTB4Ov7yUtaLyZ/niKbrp9aLOE1hv3mUX/BbFF2OtwLft80b08NJC50a7V/3mEZOYPlc3mhyJFiezF7W78a0+4N/oWwL46pyv50IbaKvU6M+BZhVEzU9ezQp/tDgthzKSyOh/HYReF461B1SDF6Wwgv9W8LLsyD5/s900yqeMMi+GaoxUD+h66puYALvhzoKMyY5tmre3J8jxJlHqQ6s8kQsi7XfZ5uYYaJz X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2B+AgBiL7FW/61jaINehAxtBohTsW4OgWQXCoUiSgKCARQBAQEBAQEBAYEJgi2CFAEBAQMBAQEBIAQnIAsFCwIBCA4KEQUBEwICAh8GAQkmAgQIBwQBGgIEh2UDCggOsEOKNA2EMQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQ0Ihg+BdYJCgjeBXAEBBRUZMgGCN4E6BYdOhks7iB2CeoJNhR0kUINOSocehS6Fb4EPhz8CHgFDggMZgWYeLgEGiCsCBxcDGnwBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,386,1449550800"; d="scan'208";a="264312737" Received: from nipigon.cs.uoguelph.ca (HELO zcs1.mail.uoguelph.ca) ([131.104.99.173]) by esa-jnhn.mail.uoguelph.ca with ESMTP; 02 Feb 2016 17:41:32 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zcs1.mail.uoguelph.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BF7F15F578; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 17:41:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from zcs1.mail.uoguelph.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zcs1.mail.uoguelph.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id HmibYBRc7mpc; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 17:41:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zcs1.mail.uoguelph.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 433A415F57B; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 17:41:31 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zcs1.mail.uoguelph.ca Received: from zcs1.mail.uoguelph.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zcs1.mail.uoguelph.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id ymtB8tLpUu22; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 17:41:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from zcs1.mail.uoguelph.ca (zcs1.mail.uoguelph.ca [172.17.95.18]) by zcs1.mail.uoguelph.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2605C15F578; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 17:41:31 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 17:41:31 -0500 (EST) From: Rick Macklem To: Don Lewis Cc: spork@bway.net, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, vivek@khera.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1270648257.999240.1454452891099.JavaMail.zimbra@uoguelph.ca> In-Reply-To: <201602021848.u12ImDES067799@gw.catspoiler.org> References: <201602021848.u12ImDES067799@gw.catspoiler.org> Subject: Re: NFS unstable with high load on server MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_999238_496640285.1454452891098" X-Originating-IP: [172.17.95.10] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.0.9_GA_6191 (ZimbraWebClient - FF44 (Win)/8.0.9_GA_6191) Thread-Topic: NFS unstable with high load on server Thread-Index: +eTWuH+jkSVFugXCRSfnA0DZY2m8bQ== X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 22:41:35 -0000 ------=_Part_999238_496640285.1454452891098 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Don Lewis wrote: > On 2 Feb, Charles Sprickman wrote: > > On Feb 2, 2016, at 1:10 AM, Ben Woods wrote: > >>=20 > >> On Monday, 1 February 2016, Vick Khera wrote: > >>=20 > >>> I have a handful of servers at my data center all running FreeBSD 10.= 2. > >>> On > >>> one of them I have a copy of the FreeBSD sources shared via NFS. When > >>> this > >>> server is running a large poudriere run re-building all the ports I n= eed, > >>> the clients' NFS mounts become unstable. That is, the clients keep > >>> getting > >>> read failures. The interactive performance of the NFS server is just > >>> fine, > >>> however. The local file system is a ZFS mirror. > >>>=20 > >>> What could be causing NFS to be unstable in this situation? > >>>=20 > >>> Specifics: > >>>=20 > >>> Server "lorax" FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE-p7 kernel locally compiled, with = NFS > >>> server and ZFS as dynamic kernel modules. 16GB RAM, Xeon 3.1GHz quad > >>> processor. > >>>=20 > >>> The directory /u/lorax1 a ZFS dataset on a mirrored pool, and is NFS > >>> exported via the ZFS exports file. I put the FreeBSD sources on this > >>> dataset and symlink to /usr/src. > >>>=20 > >>>=20 > >>> Client "bluefish" FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE-p5 kernel locally compiled, NF= S > >>> client built in to kernel. 32GB RAM, Xeon 3.1GHz quad processor > >>> (basically > >>> same hardware but more RAM). > >>>=20 > >>> The directory /n/lorax1 is NFS mounted from lorax via autofs. The NFS > >>> options are "intr,nolockd". /usr/src is symlinked to the sources in t= hat > >>> NFS mount. > >>>=20 > >>>=20 > >>> What I observe: > >>>=20 > >>> [lorax]~% cd /usr/src > >>> [lorax]src% svn status > >>> [lorax]src% w > >>> 9:12AM up 12 days, 19:19, 4 users, load averages: 4.43, 4.45, 3.61 > >>> USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT > >>> vivek pts/0 vick.int.kcilink.com 8:44AM - tmux: clie= nt > >>> (/tmp/ > >>> vivek pts/1 tmux(19747).%0 8:44AM 19 sed > >>> y%*+%pp%;s%[^_a > >>> vivek pts/2 tmux(19747).%1 8:56AM - w > >>> vivek pts/3 tmux(19747).%2 8:56AM - slogin > >>> bluefish-prv > >>> [lorax]src% pwd > >>> /u/lorax1/usr10/src > >>>=20 > >>> So right now the load average is more than 1 per processor on lorax. = I > >>> can > >>> quite easily run "svn status" on the source directory, and the > >>> interactive > >>> performance is pretty snappy for editing local files and navigating > >>> around > >>> the file system. > >>>=20 > >>>=20 > >>> On the client: > >>>=20 > >>> [bluefish]~% cd /usr/src > >>> [bluefish]src% pwd > >>> /n/lorax1/usr10/src > >>> [bluefish]src% svn status > >>> svn: E070008: Can't read directory '/n/lorax1/usr10/src/contrib/sqlit= e3': > >>> Partial results are valid but processing is incomplete > >>> [bluefish]src% svn status > >>> svn: E070008: Can't read directory '/n/lorax1/usr10/src/lib/libfetch'= : > >>> Partial results are valid but processing is incomplete > >>> [bluefish]src% svn status > >>> svn: E070008: Can't read directory > >>> '/n/lorax1/usr10/src/release/picobsd/tinyware/msg': Partial results a= re > >>> valid but processing is incomplete > >>> [bluefish]src% w > >>> 9:14AM up 93 days, 23:55, 1 user, load averages: 0.10, 0.15, 0.15 > >>> USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT > >>> vivek pts/0 lorax-prv.kcilink.com 8:56AM - w > >>> [bluefish]src% df . > >>> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > >>> lorax-prv:/u/lorax1 932845181 6090910 926754271 1% /n/lorax1 > >>>=20 > >>>=20 > >>> What I see is more or less random failures to read the NFS volume. Wh= en > >>> the > >>> server is not so busy running poudriere builds, the client never has = any > >>> failures. > >>>=20 > >>> I also observe this kind of failure doing buildworld or installworld= on > >>> the client when the server is busy -- I get strange random failures > >>> reading > >>> the files causing the build or install to fail. > >>>=20 > >>> My workaround is to not do build/installs on client machines when the= NFS > >>> server is busy doing large jobs like building all packages, but there= is > >>> definitely something wrong here I'd like to fix. I observe this on al= l > >>> the > >>> local NFS clients. I rebooted the server before to try to clear this = up > >>> but > >>> it did not fix it. > >>>=20 > >>> Any help would be appreciated. > >>>=20 > >>=20 > >> I just wanted to point out that I am experiencing this exact same issu= e in > >> my home setup. > >>=20 > >> Performing an installworld from an NFS mount works perfectly, until I > >> start > >> running poudriere on the NFS server. Then I start getting NFS timeouts= and > >> the installworld fails. > >>=20 > >> The NFS server is also using ZFS, but the NFS export in my case is bei= ng > >> done via the ZFS property "sharenfs" (I am not using the /etc/exports > >> file). > >=20 > > Me three. I=E2=80=99m actually updating a small group of servers now a= nd started > > blowing up my installworlds by trying to do some poudriere builds at th= e > > same > > time. Very repeatable. Of note, I=E2=80=99m on 9.3, and saw this on 8= .4 as well. > > If I > > track down the client-side failures, it=E2=80=99s always =E2=80=9Cpermi= ssion denied=E2=80=9D. >=20 > That sort of sounds like the problem that was fixed in HEAD with r241561 > and r241568. It was merged to 9-STABLE before 9.3-RELEASE. Try adding > the -S option to mountd_flags. I have no idea why that isn't the > default. >=20 It isn't the default because... - The first time I proposed it, the consensus was that it wasn't the correct fix and it shouldn't go in FreeBSD. - About 2 years later, folks agreed that it was ok as an interim solution, so I made it a non-default option. --> This voids it being considered a POLA violation. Maybe in a couple more years it can become the default? > When poudriere is running, it frequently mounts and unmounts > filesystems. When this happens, mount(8) and umount(8) notify mountd to > update the exports list. This is not done atomically so NFS > transactions can fail while the mountd updates the export list. The fix > mentioned above pauses the nfsd threads while the export list update is > in progress to prevent the problem. >=20 > I don't know how this works with ZFS sharenfs, though. >=20 I think it should be fine either way. (ZFS sharenfs is an alternate way to = set up ZFS exports, but I believe the result is just adding the entries to /etc/ex= ports.) If it doesn't work for some reason, just put lines in /etc/exports for the = ZFS volumes instead of using ZFS sharenfs. I recently had a report that "-S" would get stuck for a long time before performing an update of the exports when the server is under heavy load. I don't think this affects many people, but the attached 2-line patch (not yet in head) fixes the problem for the guy that reported it. rick > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 ------=_Part_999238_496640285.1454452891098 Content-Type: text/x-patch; name=nfssuspend.patch Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=nfssuspend.patch Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 LS0tIGZzL25mc3NlcnZlci9uZnNfbmZzZGtycGMuYy5zYXYyCTIwMTYtMDEtMTUgMTg6NDI6MTUu NDc5NzgzMDAwIC0wNTAwCisrKyBmcy9uZnNzZXJ2ZXIvbmZzX25mc2RrcnBjLmMJMjAxNi0wMS0x NSAxODo0NTo1OS40MTgyNDUwMDAgLTA1MDAKQEAgLTIzMSwxMCArMjMxLDE2IEBAIG5mc3N2Y19w cm9ncmFtKHN0cnVjdCBzdmNfcmVxICpycXN0LCBTVkMKIAkJICogR2V0IGEgcmVmY250IChzaGFy ZWQgbG9jaykgb24gbmZzZF9zdXNwZW5kX2xvY2suCiAJCSAqIE5GU1NWQ19TVVNQRU5ETkZTRCB3 aWxsIHRha2UgYW4gZXhjbHVzaXZlIGxvY2sgb24KIAkJICogbmZzZF9zdXNwZW5kX2xvY2sgdG8g c3VzcGVuZCB0aGVzZSB0aHJlYWRzLgorCQkgKiBUaGUgY2FsbCB0byBuZnN2NF9sb2NrKCkgdGhh dCBwcmVjZWVkcyBuZnN2NF9nZXRyZWYoKQorCQkgKiBlbnN1cmVzIHRoYXQgdGhlIGFjcXVpc2l0 aW9uIG9mIHRoZSBleGNsdXNpdmUgbG9jaworCQkgKiB0YWtlcyBwcmlvcml0eSBvdmVyIGFjcXVp c2l0aW9uIG9mIHRoZSBzaGFyZWQgbG9jayBieQorCQkgKiB3YWl0aW5nIGZvciBhbnkgZXhjbHVz aXZlIGxvY2sgcmVxdWVzdCB0byBjb21wbGV0ZS4KIAkJICogVGhpcyBtdXN0IGJlIGRvbmUgaGVy ZSwgYmVmb3JlIHRoZSBjaGVjayBvZgogCQkgKiBuZnN2NHJvb3QgZXhwb3J0cyBieSBuZnN2bm9f djRyb290ZXhwb3J0KCkuCiAJCSAqLwogCQlORlNMT0NLVjRST09UTVVURVgoKTsKKwkJbmZzdjRf bG9jaygmbmZzZF9zdXNwZW5kX2xvY2ssIDAsIE5VTEwsIE5GU1Y0Uk9PVExPQ0tNVVRFWFBUUiwK KwkJICAgIE5VTEwpOwogCQluZnN2NF9nZXRyZWYoJm5mc2Rfc3VzcGVuZF9sb2NrLCBOVUxMLCBO RlNWNFJPT1RMT0NLTVVURVhQVFIsCiAJCSAgICBOVUxMKTsKIAkJTkZTVU5MT0NLVjRST09UTVVU RVgoKTsK ------=_Part_999238_496640285.1454452891098-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Feb 3 03:39:05 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BD12A99E42 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 03:39:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luzar722@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pf0-x233.google.com (mail-pf0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FC6E1F4 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 03:39:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luzar722@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pf0-x233.google.com with SMTP id o185so5819706pfb.1 for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 19:39:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wrRIJMbCWq9r0VzjmhpTDvNkrulQT8f9SCP2lCwlO10=; b=n2hfmYVDMb4KqqtjhjNxRNk+W/sXm/xuBWTUPfLrVnznLKkudzSxv1pgknRD7f3D1J N3u0VvX+LT4M2QoqpWCSA7jcxZLHj31la/rGUak4lnUjlQT+fvNUdNAc2mfLpivvNm18 6ysdp4os/LzfTdpEpKpziofoz20yRkkmeRwJQQ/aKHll9ZWOZiw+yxc4ms5Eon9Wy3ei +gEzc9UGADOXEb/ShdNr5l/bYMqG+0Jb+8C6C2lNp/g18jkVbMAP0sK0vTqieFgl7gxV i6KMwYyafuCoAfllJ1l4ZGRj8ml+DP9jXjTCFipBs/LHuFK9mZO3EtM5VVrwJLlEbDTd /pOQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wrRIJMbCWq9r0VzjmhpTDvNkrulQT8f9SCP2lCwlO10=; b=I0gRCzMs+/TeEWWk/DrfmRr0W3yNz5iAhvnZUaeykzNcBnBj9TSfZ7Yx9X7twnPJex CUq85noIPnVPOFU1/XcIhyI2t/nVjj01pHiYRuzZna9GUjuM4el45s5rVM4/twmHRrPw 2W5BpuQ/83amF3HBiHA8Mrj4hqWJRiNjf7Z++ghz0D9QphLrXh39KJZ+HJIo6BJ+OfPA 3q9d6LlnVUgD92k9T0MuyjP0MThylEe3jaZC2WMh5ivFrgjfvvrZZeQIEkHOWw0hjM/A g4abBHkll6p3EMwjCbFPW7XmIgt/FM9U8hcrsWxB8VhWS45RIS1bPcYZk4utV9GgdcDb p2hQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTIf2yPQ1EK2hSQRM9ZYTU4m10UAOuMAhGMPEHYps1GqdlY6M5lcss+eYuTt/ewlQ== X-Received: by 10.98.9.92 with SMTP id e89mr21410264pfd.34.1454470744634; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 19:39:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.139] ([120.29.76.9]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id m86sm5785764pfi.27.2016.02.02.19.39.02 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 02 Feb 2016 19:39:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <56B1765D.2060800@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 11:39:09 +0800 From: Ernie Luzar User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Freebsd Questions Subject: sh script help with numeric values Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 03:39:05 -0000 Hello list I am having trouble getting leading zeros to show up. The following is an example of what i mean. dirname="dir" dup_count=000 dup_times=5 while [ "${dup_count}" -ne "${dup_times}" ]; do dup_count=$(( $dup_count + 001 )) dname="${dirname}-${dup_count}" echo "${dname}" done Outputs this dir-1 dir-2 dir-3 dir-4 dir-5 What I really want to see is this dir-001 dir-002 dir-003 dir-004 dir-005 dir-013 dir-111 ect How do I get the leading zeros to show? Thanks for your help From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Feb 3 03:47:11 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12171A732DE for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 03:47:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wfdudley@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-x236.google.com (mail-yw0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB9E9AD1 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 03:47:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wfdudley@gmail.com) Received: by mail-yw0-x236.google.com with SMTP id q190so2651910ywd.3 for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 19:47:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cTJ8G5WS+iMcCEIbweyTaZwyT0PkRpBTbLuNOEvFOEs=; b=vUBwQbbUE07bmjQ5qnagh1EpHiHGjk47P6kLn0OtojbT9wrH+RzxG8I81XToa/8djT HbnxEWYWjtP6QDIjDJLHyx22xNYalGYgOYc16osHJd5KAk4fpPW5BFTbs2AfhuCk70hl +ZMDwvuLNndoW4aYuX77lXQjZw6EZpNVxBwF/HaB+bJVB86y4b4+DqHAp7PHk7gMS4cB ZgAJC88ktRx6zx0dj3/WXD5RqKAnCLhv0bZ+OCHRo1Eu2HesUzjJKtS1A0mB8lDRJRWB dRRVb+5cKuGCHbN6RvxCE0xL1wRZIy6NKOHPY0dXkY29fFPCPiADTGJELH4GOUakpY6W 8tXQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=cTJ8G5WS+iMcCEIbweyTaZwyT0PkRpBTbLuNOEvFOEs=; b=nG+Dk5V597HnG86IYKkoIznnPZtQs1nGJ4nLqTowD8O+wc1gIcZJnKoqjawYQIzraa ZUJ8q1/V+jHZziEy5fhknvQL70kyHOExeuJkhbs5HkSZ7dXl+uCwhbptpcJRuBV+e35N foZVD/0US5Y5zrFRU48eWJfnJ2491garpaCIP/7/P88ilVFK2PRZovP3zaFiKg73JKtA DOA2rTLNZCHEhVQSuV/n/ImWOsc99Upe1/Or+29n8LxTD3Tlbq5aZNAZ0Odw6UTVqWwg 1K58anolu3w5TFyLUZr6DYmGFLuTmyYG2MM9hexuF+pY5k0izk76su02+VPr34R7RSHa EQ0Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORgnnzzohZ1SbiXX1NcBQSQDkjGKGDKHUcuJjakIraVRbrffZWkqENs6LF5FriRWw== X-Received: by 10.129.38.10 with SMTP id m10mr14900658ywm.183.1454471230019; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 19:47:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.27.26] (mail.casano.com. [98.109.205.15]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id i6sm1912578ywe.11.2016.02.02.19.47.08 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 02 Feb 2016 19:47:08 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: sh script help with numeric values To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <56B1765D.2060800@gmail.com> From: "William F. Dudley Jr." Message-ID: <56B1783B.7050109@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 22:47:07 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56B1765D.2060800@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 03:47:11 -0000 man printf Bill Dudley On 02/02/2016 10:39 PM, Ernie Luzar wrote: > Hello list > > I am having trouble getting leading zeros to show up. > The following is an example of what i mean. > > dirname="dir" > dup_count=000 > dup_times=5 > > while [ "${dup_count}" -ne "${dup_times}" ]; do > dup_count=$(( $dup_count + 001 )) > dname="${dirname}-${dup_count}" > echo "${dname}" > done > > Outputs this > dir-1 > dir-2 > dir-3 > dir-4 > dir-5 > > What I really want to see is this > dir-001 > dir-002 > dir-003 > dir-004 > dir-005 > dir-013 > dir-111 > ect > > How do I get the leading zeros to show? > > Thanks for your help > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Feb 3 03:53:28 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D167A736A1 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 03:53:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sm@ara-ler.com) Received: from mail-ob0-x235.google.com (mail-ob0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDA11DBF for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 03:53:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sm@ara-ler.com) Received: by mail-ob0-x235.google.com with SMTP id wb13so13256874obb.1 for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 19:53:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ara-ler-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=0nbBehKzoZ6G3Pt+ipnWeTqnfjAiDVuZN73L691l0Sk=; b=WGbCDlUSTHzx1LjWkfT7e7LSaocMqlYKzZh9yNc8Hs5d44lAjf+ZVh/N4cp193TJNy 0Tnf2/oyehlt+nnAlTGS20rlkmTuOnWd8vbhbSEZ01fek4mu6ts3gwuboSXa0DIZd0I5 6wmF62ZX/uGwQYml/ruuGK8MiwXQZX2IVs61xzazmPIdhPp0UD5gv7BxlCXqYSE5h/TC D1yp4TTQB0i/ghb0aaOCVAJfCmZ7eFAPQDHZb122B8o6gJJJFk1L/EAWSDokza2N3ZPt NQhrkTHnMqOKois9gpW7EmkYM2gSDNWoB8OmUjbl6Je+Zh0op5RdG92My4RpnZTtGVzq Hriw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=0nbBehKzoZ6G3Pt+ipnWeTqnfjAiDVuZN73L691l0Sk=; b=ZgBG7IsMuU/9GVgc0Iqvlteq7zrKkIiugzp8qvD9P/2+G4XqbYB50DaSsCUfasweVV +eOxXH2N61KXhIPH4DxjWxzaRTbSNqgRhjtuqIujibj5z8l6LmyotG/b18lqaRSEH1fy ttVqs+wBCdugl6XJgDDDDKOTr5CNLy8iRb1RcJG/nPiC+a685ft3lDJtiUaTJvSDSPxT uE/GIDcTNadiJt7Yr60kjEelJ7tW9LnAI+GlCY+PZmHs3qDZAZSgRfT1JG170cvDmS3E 4QiltYzcwu3/xY9a+z6ud5jxLAC6WkynM32OJhv3MWN+W7+X29i8ZEIN/aggoKb9qeVq S4nA== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOS92zxpGqyd4J8MwRj5OqdazaVTydkk4mJrLjG6tfF3aEKB14b8L7ckchxmbBu05g== X-Received: by 10.60.47.7 with SMTP id z7mr27252910oem.66.1454471607215; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 19:53:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from dendrobates.araler.com (75-166-211-166.hlrn.qwest.net. [75.166.211.166]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q4sm2716160oew.6.2016.02.02.19.53.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 02 Feb 2016 19:53:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 20:53:24 -0700 From: Sergey Manucharian To: Ernie Luzar Cc: Freebsd Questions Subject: Re: sh script help with numeric values Message-ID: <20160203035324.GH1828@dendrobates.araler.com> References: <56B1765D.2060800@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56B1765D.2060800@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 03:53:28 -0000 Hello Ernie, Excerpts from Ernie Luzar's message from Wed 03-Feb-16 11:39: > Hello list > > I am having trouble getting leading zeros to show up. > The following is an example of what i mean. > > dirname="dir" > dup_count=000 > dup_times=5 > > while [ "${dup_count}" -ne "${dup_times}" ]; do > dup_count=$(( $dup_count + 001 )) > dname="${dirname}-${dup_count}" > echo "${dname}" > done > > Outputs this > dir-1 > dir-2 > dir-3 > dir-4 > dir-5 > > What I really want to see is this > dir-001 > dir-002 > dir-003 > dir-004 > dir-005 > dir-013 > dir-111 > ect > > How do I get the leading zeros to show? This is an arithmetic expression: dup_count=$(( $dup_count + 001 )) which gives calculate a number, you don't need to use leading zeros. Use "printf" instead of "echo" to output the result. Example: $ A=3 $ printf "%03d\n" $A $ 003 -- Sergey From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Feb 3 05:11:26 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBBEAA99E55 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 05:11:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markham@ssimicro.com) Received: from mail.ssimicro.com (mail.ssimicro.com [64.247.129.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.ssimicro.com", Issuer "RapidSSL SHA256 CA - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACAECD8F for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 05:11:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markham@ssimicro.com) Received: from Markhams-MacBook-Pro.local (64-247-134-200.ssimicro.com [64.247.134.200]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.ssimicro.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u1357r0Y020841 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 2 Feb 2016 22:07:54 -0700 (MST) Subject: Re: sh script help with numeric values To: Ernie Luzar , Freebsd Questions References: <56B1765D.2060800@gmail.com> From: markham breitbach Message-ID: <56B18BF4.6030002@ssimicro.com> Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 22:11:16 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56B1765D.2060800@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 05:11:27 -0000 I've always liked jot for this sort of thing: dirname="dir" start=0 count=5 for i in `jot -w%03d $count $start`; do echo $dirname-$i done -Markham On 2016-02-02 8:39 PM, Ernie Luzar wrote: > Hello list > > I am having trouble getting leading zeros to show up. > The following is an example of what i mean. > > dirname="dir" > dup_count=000 > dup_times=5 > > while [ "${dup_count}" -ne "${dup_times}" ]; do > dup_count=$(( $dup_count + 001 )) > dname="${dirname}-${dup_count}" > echo "${dname}" > done > > Outputs this > dir-1 > dir-2 > dir-3 > dir-4 > dir-5 > > What I really want to see is this > dir-001 > dir-002 > dir-003 > dir-004 > dir-005 > dir-013 > dir-111 > ect > > How do I get the leading zeros to show? > > Thanks for your help > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Feb 3 09:53:44 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B914A99F80 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 09:53:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF801AAB for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 09:53:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Received: from [10.0.0.3] (testbox.usenet4all.se [10.0.0.3]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id u139rWjm091887; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 10:53:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Subject: Re: Index To: "Forsyth, Emily B." , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" References: From: Bernt Hansson Message-ID: <56B1CE57.7050503@bananmonarki.se> Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 10:54:31 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 09:53:44 -0000 On 2016-02-02 16:27, Forsyth, Emily B. wrote: > Very new to DocBook5 and the language used. I'm creating a set of documents and want to include an Index, but trying to figure out the indexing method, I'm not having very much luck. Can someone please guide me? > > > Thank you, > > Emily Forsyth > Have you tried http://www.docbook.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Feb 3 12:29:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8FA9A99D2F for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 12:29:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sales7@meritvendor.com) Received: from mail-qg0-x24d.google.com (mail-qg0-x24d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::24d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1B4F15FE for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 12:29:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sales7@meritvendor.com) Received: by mail-qg0-x24d.google.com with SMTP id b35so20924qge.2 for ; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 04:29:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=meritvendor-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=m+cjTFjAlASDlsNFgEM4fIZZ2DcXIQiIT078RH7NtPE=; b=OG3ezOLTHK9CbPUet0/Of9iGwphSFKMXPil0ARVxbkc/Qlo5DWS09ShRc2fK9RZStV A3bOqyntLhl3FT3WPT4bF+oOvAeLCKHhwNFgtia7KkyT4GWEszxWkDaM+prlIwaClc2c IWbNECde2ErexGWz/ICdvfnYXw2jh82DP9UQ/hdXd03hGhHrzopqfJo9SU5jPOYM/kKJ t7G+RVllm0KOBZ1qjGzRmooi1GIhPvX44zAz4fBcS7yLKYCSOjs9Ca25/9TjSq17XjaG UdtbGPXax5ffwzcPLcDGiGhufnH0mxCp1Ff+JjtEEEluRUTVZVBCDuH1fmg82NY2slGW T7cQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=m+cjTFjAlASDlsNFgEM4fIZZ2DcXIQiIT078RH7NtPE=; b=NrwHiLso/srPldGGCKf28/gz3YV1Hb75iwGiBxh/yUDH6KufhhvjuQ9kgMhJfwg7t9 6G6Bq351GRKqGhKncI4D8xb4pQOOnkHP5/wDO0XjRy7NLnkNu13TVfCwA2uOE+Nbk5vs +BIKnZa+MI2xYcSA/r8LglZV25E9D2A3f+0D1q105oUfSRVOTh0XLAl8jpGHUSTGjyUR 2XZtbILUnWe7PxtTITjuJespN97byQe/hVhlLBSgKxtnZdHBqBxSZy7fXtUbjqnetGTd R010+HwpCXTj5FhDctGSMvWsF69UKMiCwNP6D9jj/hQ/cG8+ezitUg3m+wJFS40seSJ6 Z2yg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORoMNqT0bnTdG8QZkameV8r5TM7PM7k+UvhSyqYmXz0LUp82NDidrJqmYEPRpoOh55t0vuw MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.129.71.85 with SMTP id u82mr1142982ywa.9.1454502573381; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 04:29:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <001a114d716c3648af052adcc50d@google.com> Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 12:29:33 +0000 Subject: Attention required! website may be in trouble:Freebsd.org From: Giorgia Atzeni To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 12:29:34 -0000 Hi Freebsd.org Team, Hope you are great and everything fine at your end. I have gone through your website and I felt its well built but can be improved in several ways to get better sales and revenue from the site. If you would like me to send you complete list of upgrading and improvements we could do to your site then kindly let me know so that I can send you the brief quotation for your website. After in-depth research about your website and analyzing the targeted market for your business to prevail, we also execute effective online marketing campaigns by targeting not only local markets but as well as provincial and international markets as well. So you will be getting *all-in-one services* when contacting us. It's only search engine tricks that need to keep changing when the ranking algorithm changes. We will help you to increase your visibility in all the major search engines by *improving keyword rankings* and *boosting your real time website traffic* with lots of back links which are always done through *White Hat* techniques, indeed you position your website properly to be found at the most critical points in the buying process or when people need your site. Our aim is to provide you with complete web marketing solutions to help your website rank high on the search engines. Before moving on further, we will have a consultation phase where we will discuss what your website goals are and how we can accomplish them. In addition, we may ask you certain questions that may be concerning on the website structure and strategic foundation for your social media marketing. Should you have any questions, please let us know. To improve the search engine visibility of your website, we will look forward to hear from you when you've time after reading our proposal. *Sincerely,* *Luca Curic .* From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Feb 3 22:24:28 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D33A9A9AA11 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 22:24:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Albert.Shih@obspm.fr) Received: from mx-p1.obspm.fr (mx-p1.obspm.fr [145.238.193.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "*.obspm.fr", Issuer "TERENA SSL CA 3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 772A91CB0 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 22:24:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Albert.Shih@obspm.fr) Received: from pcjas.obspm.fr (pcjas.obspm.fr [145.238.184.233]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx-p1.obspm.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/DIO Observatoire de Paris - 15/04/10) with ESMTP id u13MNmOe026010 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 23:23:49 +0100 Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 23:23:48 +0100 From: Albert Shih To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Problem with fonts devel/tig Message-ID: <20160203222348.GA44855@pcjas.obspm.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.9 (mx-p1.obspm.fr [145.238.193.20]); Wed, 03 Feb 2016 23:23:49 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at mx-p1.obspm.fr X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 22:24:28 -0000 Hi, I've a very strange problem with tig (devel/tig), I use : FreeBSD 10-Stable urxvt-unicode zsh when I launch tig I don't get the « arrow » but something like ^@ M^@^@ instead of a arrow. I google but don't find any clue or something close to my problem. I first guest it's was a problem with fonts but when I do a ssh to a linux-box and launch tig on linux (from my urxvt/FreeBSD) everything work fine. And when I launch mutt I got all the « arrow »_thing. Anyone got this problem ? ...or better a solution Regards. -- Albert SHIH DIO bâtiment 15 Observatoire de Paris 5 Place Jules Janssen 92195 Meudon Cedex France Téléphone : +33 1 45 07 76 26/+33 6 86 69 95 71 xmpp: jas@obspm.fr Heure local/Local time: mer 3 fév 2016 23:23:40 CET From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Feb 4 00:00:20 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9AFCA9A832 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 00:00:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@immure.com) Received: from maul.immure.com (108-84-10-9.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.84.10.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96C791337 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 00:00:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com ([10.1.132.9]) by maul.immure.com with esmtp (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1aR543-000Gcu-0x for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 15:34:15 -0600 Received: from rancor.immure.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u13LYE3Q061221 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 15:34:14 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.14.9/Submit) id u13LYExB061218 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 15:34:14 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bob) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 15:34:14 -0600 From: Bob Willcox To: questions list Message-ID: <20160203213414.GB60231@rancor.immure.com> Reply-To: Bob Willcox MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 10.1.132.9 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: bob@immure.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on maul.immure.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Subject: Switch from legacy to UEFI boot?? X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on maul.immure.com) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 00:00:20 -0000 Is there a way to convert a system from legacy boot to UEFI boot? I have an Intel NUC5i7RYH and I can get it to boot ok in legacy boot mode but only if I go into the BIOS and manually select the partition. It (the BIOS) won't automatically boot from it. Tells me there's no boot device. Thanks, Bob -- Bob Willcox | bob@immure.com | Entropy isn't what it used to be. Austin, TX | From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Feb 4 00:02:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 789DCA9A938 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 00:02:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F864174D for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 00:01:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aR7Mo-0001k1-HJ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 01:01:46 +0100 Received: from ppp234-130.static.internode.on.net ([59.167.234.130]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 01:01:46 +0100 Received: from newsgroups by ppp234-130.static.internode.on.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 01:01:46 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ruben Schade Subject: Migrating ZFS on Linux pools to FreeBSD Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 11:01:35 +1100 Lines: 27 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp234-130.static.internode.on.net X-Mozilla-News-Host: news://news.gmane.org:119 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 00:02:00 -0000 Hi everyone, I'm migrating a home HP Gen8 Microserver from Debian Jessie to FreeBSD 10.2. I have two mirrored ZFS pools created with the ZFS on Linux port, and want to access them on FreeBSD. I understand FreeBSD's ZFS implementation is more mature and pre-dates the Linux port, and some web searches indicate the two may not be entirely compatible. Most recommendations seem to be not to run Linux and FreeBSD off the same pools, for example: https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/installing-freebsd-in-an-existing-zfs-pool.54831/ Does the same hold true for just data stores, and ones that are being migrated over without being accessed by Linux again? Are there any practical limitations to just using a ZFS pool created on Linux? If there’s reasonable doubt of issues I'll just rebuilt the pools under FreeBSD, but would be great if I didn't need to do that. It'd be cool if it’s just a # zpool upgrade away hah :) Cheers, -- Cheers, Ruben Schade in s/Singapore/Sydney/ https://rubenerd.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Feb 4 07:49:47 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0451BA9BAD0 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 07:49:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no (smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no [IPv6:2001:700:1100:1:200:ff:fe00:b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no", Issuer "Fagskolen i Gj??vik" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78569F9F for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 07:49:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from mail.fig.ol.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u147nawV086204 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 4 Feb 2016 08:49:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from localhost (trond@localhost) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u147nYps086201; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 08:49:34 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fig.ol.no: trond owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 08:49:34 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= Sender: Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no To: Bob Willcox cc: questions list Subject: Re: Switch from legacy to UEFI boot?? In-Reply-To: <20160203213414.GB60231@rancor.immure.com> Message-ID: References: <20160203213414.GB60231@rancor.immure.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) Organization: Fagskolen Innlandet OpenPGP: url=http://fig.ol.no/~trond/trond.key MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, AWL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail.fig.ol.no Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 07:49:47 -0000 On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 15:34-0600, Bob Willcox wrote: > Is there a way to convert a system from legacy boot to UEFI boot? I have an > Intel NUC5i7RYH and I can get it to boot ok in legacy boot mode but only if I > go into the BIOS and manually select the partition. It (the BIOS) won't > automatically boot from it. Tells me there's no boot device. UEFI requires the GPT partitioning scheme and a special boot partition on the harddrive, a EFI System Partition (ESP). If you don't have GPT on your drive, your best option is to backup anything precious, redo the partitioning, and reinstall your system. If you already use the GPT partitioning scheme and can make some extra room on your harddrive, then you'll be able to create a small ESP of 800K, and populate that partition with /boot/boot1.efifat. E.g.: gpart create -t efi -s 800K -l esp0 ada0 gpart bootcode -p /boot/boot1.efifat -i ada0 -- +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, | | Trond Endrestøl, | Trond Endrestøl, | | IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, | | Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gjøvik Technical College, Norway, | | tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, | | sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. | +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Feb 4 08:31:03 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1C3DA9BC00 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 08:31:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69726AB1 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 08:31:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from liminal.local (liminal.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3636:3bff:fed4:b0d6]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u148UwTj048620 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 08:30:58 GMT (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk u148UwTj048620 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/u148UwTj048620; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host liminal.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3636:3bff:fed4:b0d6] claimed to be liminal.local Subject: Re: Migrating ZFS on Linux pools to FreeBSD To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: Matthew Seaman X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <56B30C42.1030006@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 08:30:58 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gSJi9SEoeNCBruLhUobwjtVuUla1At6p9" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 08:31:03 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --gSJi9SEoeNCBruLhUobwjtVuUla1At6p9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 04/02/2016 00:01, Ruben Schade wrote: > I'm migrating a home HP Gen8 Microserver from Debian Jessie to FreeBSD > 10.2. I have two mirrored ZFS pools created with the ZFS on Linux port,= > and want to access them on FreeBSD. >=20 > I understand FreeBSD's ZFS implementation is more mature and pre-dates > the Linux port, and some web searches indicate the two may not be > entirely compatible. Most recommendations seem to be not to run Linux > and FreeBSD off the same pools, for example: >=20 > https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/installing-freebsd-in-an-existing-zf= s-pool.54831/ >=20 >=20 > Does the same hold true for just data stores, and ones that are being > migrated over without being accessed by Linux again? Are there any > practical limitations to just using a ZFS pool created on Linux? >=20 > If there=E2=80=99s reasonable doubt of issues I'll just rebuilt the poo= ls under > FreeBSD, but would be great if I didn't need to do that. It'd be cool i= f > it=E2=80=99s just a # zpool upgrade away hah :) So long as the ZFS pool only has feature flags enabled that are supported on both systems, then you should be able to mount your linux-created pool on FreeBSD. A good way to test that is to boot a live FreeBSD image from the install media. See if you can import the pool and then access the contents. Cheers, Matthew --gSJi9SEoeNCBruLhUobwjtVuUla1At6p9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJWswxCXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATsJ8P/iL6X2k+pIHfaRw8UnkxhCCn UmLKEvPkVuyOrcAZEtTYk3lPQgBlVoX9nF8APT69ehbY1rNi193lelzS6fuRGjCm m8Xs7SXI/RnD7R1pkpSbjD5eSAlhUBPLvRnxTsMjNrByealjBe6fG6aJ4TTMNEqk 5IOCDcXj4Hv9Y4Ba2LOi98a2OtSU0AsBqg1Zgf7spNT1Nra9B7qBiRhPXFa0T2Rx YbA27QVA9kPTQfkw0GHw4dWKrJTcz+uctDx5iqQDYGE3VVmIVoDr3tR4kIn3FPIQ 4N/ji5mtXL8zqB8A5dID8dY5FBG0DXcJawRpFZ/Liz93AvbNuxmpwEyd/J4XDc49 f2g4C3AKrDZ59ahXu8YvvCckn3ojGr0oV5VtGvZq0DIsLO2CJ2ddlbeEGJw8JeIZ +SvGveEN6mtI8T+lDHoan2LYqviMNU+HEx4l7nZjxrMW1AeP62CcUjytgnlxIcjE smRVJivq/eBEW8MWC8nwTmwzdGFJc00Ev9BOmFVfl+42OGF7DCV70M96E/jOOImu QTsGGo4oSY+cm4g86lcTlVL2wJJUZfwg2KRzcBk1XlMQC4JHp3x6c+oMxmYk2anW pKNDOTM9Bb45UobRCqk9sOQDkA4Exl4p5excmeZ0Koemm/YvigPPR1MdzD9remV0 qK2CQnHS2TFYOAsrIt4F =njQ7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gSJi9SEoeNCBruLhUobwjtVuUla1At6p9-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Feb 4 07:36:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCB05A9B3BF for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 07:36:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amruthav@juniper.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8771ACA for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 07:36:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amruthav@juniper.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A5FCCA9B3BE; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 07:36:34 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BAC1A9B3BD for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 07:36:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amruthav@juniper.net) Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1on0130.outbound.protection.outlook.com [157.56.110.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32117AC7 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 07:36:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amruthav@juniper.net) Received: from BY2PR05MB629.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.218.12) by BY2PR05MB632.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.218.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.396.15; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 07:01:40 +0000 Received: from BY2PR05MB629.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.218.12]) by BY2PR05MB629.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.218.12]) with mapi id 15.01.0396.020; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 07:01:40 +0000 From: Amrutha Deshpande To: "questions@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Unable to login to bigpink through secureCRT Thread-Topic: Unable to login to bigpink through secureCRT Thread-Index: AdFfGdmjRecMBBo/T8Gt7jtppxEFIw== Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 07:01:40 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: FreeBSD.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;FreeBSD.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=juniper.net; x-originating-ip: [116.197.184.13] x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BY2PR05MB632; 5:vfxeglJEH5ttw9DFySleSbe38KSdTHgEAFjynJ6kde1TvWUkcrBD67/lD5ErMh2zm2UEnjW4ss0yVq7gnkQcVzhE/2KcYY2Wd64Cn2QdeS8J07xrX5I+DHhmIWaxhye41ixzL59cvn8pGGHOsJBuWA==; 24:AsfC5LGDCYwyuw1P3EgDjvN1jxfd83V2H/3aeV2wT6tAI8t2gEAEuYh6imcEqHWsu0PF9/t/1hYinmdjHvBdyouVvB4CV0jTzkG3ydGxTZU= x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR05MB632; x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 4d8faff4-54e7-47e9-0e81-08d32d310860 x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046); SRVR:BY2PR05MB632; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY2PR05MB632; x-forefront-prvs: 084285FC5C x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(77096005)(2900100001)(99286002)(15975445007)(2351001)(33656002)(229853001)(54356999)(76576001)(110136002)(86362001)(66066001)(92566002)(5002640100001)(50986999)(11100500001)(5004730100002)(450100001)(5003600100002)(189998001)(5008740100001)(87936001)(1730700002)(107886002)(586003)(2501003)(10400500002)(19580395003)(2906002)(74316001)(1096002)(102836003)(6116002)(3846002)(3280700002)(3660700001)(5001960100002)(40100003)(1220700001)(122556002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR05MB632; H:BY2PR05MB629.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en; spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 04 Feb 2016 07:01:40.4969 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY2PR05MB632 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 12:17:33 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 07:36:34 -0000 Hi, I am getting the following error on logging into bigpink "Hostname lookup failed: host not found" My user id is: amruthav Could you please help me fix this. Thanks and regards, Amrutha From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Feb 4 13:14:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D473A9B985 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 13:14:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE303DA8 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 13:14:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from host-4-75.office.adestra.com (vpn-1.adestra.com [46.236.37.122]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u14DEF3M054653 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 4 Feb 2016 13:14:16 GMT (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk u14DEF3M054653 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/u14DEF3M054653; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host vpn-1.adestra.com [46.236.37.122] claimed to be host-4-75.office.adestra.com Subject: Re: Unable to login to bigpink through secureCRT To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, amruthav@juniper.net References: From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <56B34EA7.1000708@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 13:14:15 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HhVKTNVUSMsrG6rJLewl4DqJ8KQoKmeCf" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 13:14:23 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --HhVKTNVUSMsrG6rJLewl4DqJ8KQoKmeCf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2016/02/04 07:01, Amrutha Deshpande wrote: > I am getting the following error on logging into bigpink >=20 > "Hostname lookup failed: host not found" >=20 > My user id is: amruthav >=20 > Could you please help me fix this. Did you mean to send that to freebsd-questions@ ? It looks more like a matter for your internal IT department -- something needing attention in the DNS presumably. Cheers, Matthew --HhVKTNVUSMsrG6rJLewl4DqJ8KQoKmeCf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJWs06nXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxOUYxNTRFQ0JGMTEyRTUwNTQ0RTNGMzAw MDUxM0YxMEUwQTlFNEU3AAoJEABRPxDgqeTnYlEP/3YGGDRc/1EEv+CULe0fjyBc t0SaHuqpPnXIZguUy7vRRXwdsDqHE9rZF2SjSpvG0+O/BqTnv5E4VfjKIhzdKnHV jvDKD1trHonpzugvjRSgdUyI5Qu1/QNMFiPyxq8DTJq13NVTkByZwpGOL3BALzTz hUaSOx5K2hwc5aaMxYW4hLVTiiAbG0aZzAUFzeRFl6/eMxOjGlQTca9RivLovtCk xh2OpA/afe9yjuTJdaDXJDaUci2LxqhR8niIdDZKiwWQpHSONZqzYLWHg3zrDagQ nhTcyqC+Qjg9dSiM7Wwh0ZQAi+9RX3npFNPjTDqqQRyP9Mkex9qIufQWEM/1PVbP BJzUda8E7iTpE2aR0JcHo1dKFiijDbw9ffjRI3lc/pNB0gjSCUzRu5nTfBVkIvue BSCH2k5ALnWL8YewhS5ahxBQajPM/y3qc4qLMF7BSV0qTqsLMOp1SVTgTfYuSt1R 3edGd46XeODUdtGP43WIfDNPWWoZ4Byqde4BoyyXrZgrVCpVQ/npm4UvrKafCHOi 6G0f/W4b7Li21DY87T+ufVUh6IqY1n+8gTVLU0qp+ZfeC3RvdEILwCa/LQj4hS8B w9K8alPHPp/RjYHn/pNw3R2TN0jx07mmD947XM+nD8MSZGb+prOOX2+MRuRtZNLI pkGiO5Omi3K2JeLoRtfb =d3zB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HhVKTNVUSMsrG6rJLewl4DqJ8KQoKmeCf-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Feb 4 13:37:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BBA0A9C2B2 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 13:37:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from anny.lostinspace.de (anny.lostinspace.de [IPv6:2a01:138:a006::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 312FF1A80 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 13:37:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from server.idefix.lan (aftr-88-217-181-152.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.181.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: idefix@fechner.net) by anny.lostinspace.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 666A8160CF8 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 14:36:50 +0100 (CET) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.1 anny.lostinspace.de 666A8160CF8 Authentication-Results: anny.lostinspace.de; dmarc=none header.from=fechner.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=fechner.net; s=default; t=1454593010; bh=6vT9IV59YBPEe+PZP00jL4Ue/BeJQnuwjDOVQK0WyzA=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=D9DktJclj2HU1jzQZGwyob/ONPiiBsFYEgTgQ/YfJLal/+5Hv/HTW+2TDqZG+188N nxaJgkEYg8dF1Bw+9YedYbrS0aWuJkPILOPJeBkBD52SECihnjcaxge4w1uRKxWX4e 3qcpQMaYDmj9n/SYn+VElRM+qFSsnOPAI59Kzv9E= Received: from [192.168.0.151] (aftr-88-217-181-152.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.181.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.idefix.lan (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EBBDF9ED88 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 14:36:49 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Switch from legacy to UEFI boot?? To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20160203213414.GB60231@rancor.immure.com> From: Matthias Fechner Message-ID: <56B353E5.9080605@fechner.net> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 14:36:37 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 13:37:02 -0000 Am 04.02.2016 um 08:49 schrieb Trond Endrestøl: > If you already use the GPT partitioning scheme and can make some extra > room on your harddrive, then you'll be able to create a small ESP of > 800K, and populate that partition with /boot/boot1.efifat. > > E.g.: > > gpart create -t efi -s 800K -l esp0 ada0 > gpart bootcode -p /boot/boot1.efifat -i ada0 is it true that currently the EFI loaded cannot boot a ZFS root? Thanks Matthias -- "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning." -- Rich Cook From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Feb 4 13:52:07 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C186CA9C87B for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 13:52:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bourne.identity@hotmail.com) Received: from BLU004-OMC4S9.hotmail.com (blu004-omc4s9.hotmail.com [65.55.111.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EF12799 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 13:52:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bourne.identity@hotmail.com) Received: from BLU437-SMTP81 ([65.55.111.137]) by BLU004-OMC4S9.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Thu, 4 Feb 2016 05:50:59 -0800 X-TMN: [rHajOV++Bf8PwcAGXC6WOlD1aTc/nZrjbtsQgAEl2AI=] X-Originating-Email: [bourne.identity@hotmail.com] Message-ID: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Manish Jain Subject: Is alacarte ever going to be fixed ? Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 19:20:10 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Feb 2016 13:50:57.0645 (UTC) FILETIME=[1304A1D0:01D15F53] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 13:52:07 -0000 Hi all, While FreeBSD (10.2 amd64, in my case) is looking more and more of what an ideal OS should be, I wish the hiccup with alacarte is somehow fixed. For at least the last 3 FreeBSD+GNOME releases I have tried, trying to launch alacarte yields something like the following greeting : # alacarte Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/alacarte", line 21, in from Alacarte.MainWindow import main ImportError: No module named 'Alacarte' -- Regards, Manish Jain From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Feb 4 14:03:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6515DA9CB8E for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 14:03:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no (smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no [IPv6:2001:700:1100:1:200:ff:fe00:b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no", Issuer "Fagskolen i Gj??vik" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6FC3D33 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 14:03:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from mail.fig.ol.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u14E3YSB087533 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 4 Feb 2016 15:03:34 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from localhost (trond@localhost) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u14E3Xn5087530; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 15:03:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fig.ol.no: trond owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 15:03:33 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= Sender: Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no To: Matthias Fechner cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Switch from legacy to UEFI boot?? In-Reply-To: <56B353E5.9080605@fechner.net> Message-ID: References: <20160203213414.GB60231@rancor.immure.com> <56B353E5.9080605@fechner.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) Organization: Fagskolen Innlandet OpenPGP: url=http://fig.ol.no/~trond/trond.key MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, AWL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail.fig.ol.no Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 14:03:49 -0000 On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 14:36+0100, Matthias Fechner wrote: > Am 04.02.2016 um 08:49 schrieb Trond Endrestøl: > > If you already use the GPT partitioning scheme and can make some extra > > room on your harddrive, then you'll be able to create a small ESP of > > 800K, and populate that partition with /boot/boot1.efifat. > > > > E.g.: > > > > gpart create -t efi -s 800K -l esp0 ada0 > > gpart bootcode -p /boot/boot1.efifat -i ada0 > > is it true that currently the EFI loaded cannot boot a ZFS root? As of r294999, stable/10's boot1.efi and loader.efi is able to boot ZFS. Both boot1.efi and loader.efi takes the bootfs property into consideration. Finally we can use the familiar loader menu, and not something I last saw when I used FreeBSD 4. If you use BE's, then the loader.efi boot menu lets you select which BE to boot from. It's a dream come true. I was able to scrap the 4 GiB UFS partition I previously used for storing /boot. The laptop behind me is proof enough, although you can't see it and thus not verify my claims. It multiboots Windows 10 and FreeBSD 10, using rEFInd as the boot manager rEFInd is told to load Windows' \EFI\BOOT\BOOTX64.EFI for Windows 10, and \FreeBSD\boot1.efi for FreeBSD 10. The EFI firmware loads the rEFInd boot loader by default, but I have also added EFI boot menu entries for Windows 10 and FreeBSD 10, should rEFInd decide to act up. http://www.rodsbooks.com/refind/ Maybe you should wait until the next stable/10 snapshot is available, as the snapshot from 20150127 is one day or so behind r294999. http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=294999 You can use boot1.efi and loader.efi from the latest head snapshot if you can't wait, I did for one of my newest stable/10 VMs back home. -- +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, | | Trond Endrestøl, | Trond Endrestøl, | | IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, | | Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gjøvik Technical College, Norway, | | tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, | | sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. | +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Feb 4 14:50:47 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E355FA9A60D for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 14:50:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.wandersee@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ig0-f182.google.com (mail-ig0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA52F1D74 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 14:50:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.wandersee@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ig0-f182.google.com with SMTP id ik10so16575219igb.1 for ; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 06:50:47 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+ttTgFx7jj+7zv9bLawZ63ze2PWCZSjOj9dk/sdPdlE=; b=hnlJi45PjVoEMK45lxqpuC2G+7HNhnDpfKc6+mckZWHIeUgwhyFmRsAd9mTFZtnIno 7EO1YxkmKgmiHXib0njCEhm5onRYIk2LYFjLRQOv4iP6QF1uVZyPXaLyqVu6arHSRKaP a822dWP99zRY2CdHDusjoYPEdcZw66rT9C02+7JNdETV8InBSiiabaYHfISmrfKXJVkK S4hYv8zgHXf6aQgnf1Q/aUoBngmF6vVCtxS5vdBnlQ3knQcsRYb0N1WwYUDd9jy/7wC6 Qq1s9GVrDwUOaME7RvRXMglVAAYivU1XH0hN9fG/sArNDg2MDlQRChPa6j4QrwkxChiN o3dA== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQRoMTZINIetNC9FM5YHE8G74Xqdhe3OmzTbyhCoU5YAFAlW+2mVKXBF1ehdbA8LA== X-Received: by 10.50.142.9 with SMTP id rs9mr9902810igb.76.1454597446688; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 06:50:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from WorkBox.Home.gmail.com (75-161-209-252.mpls.qwest.net. [75.161.209.252]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 63sm4943654ion.4.2016.02.04.06.50.45 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Feb 2016 06:50:45 -0800 (PST) References: <20160203213414.GB60231@rancor.immure.com> <56B353E5.9080605@fechner.net> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.15; emacs 24.5.1 From: Brandon J. Wandersee To: Trond =?utf-8?Q?Endrest=C3=B8l?= Cc: Matthias Fechner , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Switch from legacy to UEFI boot?? In-reply-to: Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 08:50:44 -0600 Message-ID: <86k2mk7cmz.fsf@WorkBox.Home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 14:50:48 -0000 Trond EndrestÞl writes: > On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 14:36+0100, Matthias Fechner wrote: >> >> is it true that currently the EFI loaded cannot boot a ZFS root? > > As of r294999, stable/10's boot1.efi and loader.efi is able to boot > ZFS. Both boot1.efi and loader.efi takes the bootfs property into > consideration... Maybe you should wait until the next stable/10 > snapshot is available... The ZFS-compatible EFI loader is expected to be ready for 10.3-RELEASE, which is scheduled for about six weeks from now.[1] It may be a bit more or less time than that, depending on how things go, but the first beta snapshot of 10.3 (which is cut from 10-STABLE) is set to be built tomorrow. If you don't want to run a development branch, you won't have much longer to wait. Though once that change happens, you'd have to back up your data and reconfigure your boot scheme to make use of ZFS-compatible UEFI booting. [1]: https://www.freebsd.org/releases/10.3R/schedule.html -- ================================================================= :: Brandon Wandersee :: :: brandon.wandersee@gmail.com :: ================================================================== From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Feb 4 15:06:33 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1259EA9AFAF for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 15:06:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.wandersee@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ig0-f181.google.com (mail-ig0-f181.google.com [209.85.213.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0A1DA89; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 15:06:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.wandersee@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ig0-f181.google.com with SMTP id xg9so27375291igb.1; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 07:06:32 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=ppHx4EtTvYkcPGU8Wia5OS7rd5cselvafFQvWGelQRU=; b=DHnotVP0V5hfLk/prSwvR8YLA/qZytNqOIq6r9zSQ6IbdA1GVYzRQCBOtapcHurXix CyQsTKRY5pj5gDiLU6B07X9PHix2a9MIhTaPcJLIDYl9MgeQFK4EyS893zuv/baAzbzG tSMMF3MzQGHsfppv5QVP413nENvtO9oQ6OderaJVBbloCBFSOKtyDba/XfPjktby1Ng0 5LHlC6z17DzD0wsIBW6wPLPnAKiO9YXsyb4LzIIiJvBmhHa/u6UY8TcS02u7VkkT8ctI NkOs9pzRcxPSPB8c6LdLGvgAijV52MUfQMo/SsTpVdY4j5ZaUC8CHN9BO3+RNN4DOVEH Ru+Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSsnp7LxaDq8fq94GO1uoEBa+oVTMb0FKtyqhzg3qt+gk1jdxgWTAidPwS5d/XY7A== X-Received: by 10.50.134.41 with SMTP id ph9mr9047659igb.71.1454596555234; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 06:35:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from WorkBox.Home.gmail.com (75-161-209-252.mpls.qwest.net. [75.161.209.252]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d36sm4907835ioj.18.2016.02.04.06.35.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Feb 2016 06:35:54 -0800 (PST) References: <56B30C42.1030006@FreeBSD.org> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.15; emacs 24.5.1 From: Brandon J. Wandersee To: Matthew Seaman Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Migrating ZFS on Linux pools to FreeBSD In-reply-to: <56B30C42.1030006@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 08:35:52 -0600 Message-ID: <86lh707dbr.fsf@WorkBox.Home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 15:06:33 -0000 Matthew Seaman writes: >> I understand FreeBSD's ZFS implementation is more mature and pre-dates >> the Linux port, and some web searches indicate the two may not be >> entirely compatible. To add to what Matthew said: if FreeBSD uses a more recent version of zpool, and you run `zpool upgrade` on FreeBSD, I presume that would be a point of no return. And while I can't say for certain--since I've never tried it--actively sharing a single zpool between two operating systems might be a bit of a pain. You'd need to export the pool from one system and then import it to the other on every boot, no? In short, permanently moving a pool from Linux to FreeBSD shouldn't be any hassle. Moving in the other direction, however... -- ================================================================= :: Brandon Wandersee :: :: brandon.wandersee@gmail.com :: ================================================================== From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Feb 4 15:20:59 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01A58A998C7 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 15:20:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.wandersee@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io0-f173.google.com (mail-io0-f173.google.com [209.85.223.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF230183F for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 15:20:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.wandersee@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io0-f173.google.com with SMTP id f81so95785925iof.0 for ; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 07:20:58 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=RhkvFcXpLSnk8PnDUDlXI00pLTDVOD/8cJ7lXIKZ9Jw=; b=S7PGdd3hTUH/yvZMBc+HGNzmvlfSrjM/cx4JQBaETNqoCyY1gSK21FENgWkOS0oj5P H1k+I036NnMMZeT/QBucdQcWDpmUnEz1y2XMUjxmNhuGNQbTDRNvoRm+2HOvPeoxFjPs IqBfeEfM+3kVztxu0nPDJoWpO/bNWZqNSFxhkz0aHr0NMlP0dAKv4fIyj7BlXz9ttQs4 L3z4NalrLyGOz0k3pBiVu8gp9iDpZiOw/fuvkgjeHa5Yyn4SnqrpystlHhNeEO8gqrEf jjgI6Von0ZH88lp0yJNpyDIbZ/AGRXE0lhzO+udr5sfaxiJCtyjoXMjmR/rnFubqs2uV VTyg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOR53hI1QKwe4qX0L4OK78rx2IPAM2JIr0L8k3M4CQcXUImsruLEpzU9Q7e80jfNpA== X-Received: by 10.107.43.151 with SMTP id r145mr9477305ior.156.1454597820944; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 06:57:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from WorkBox.Home.gmail.com (75-161-209-252.mpls.qwest.net. [75.161.209.252]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m4sm8769360igv.10.2016.02.04.06.56.59 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Feb 2016 06:56:59 -0800 (PST) References: User-agent: mu4e 0.9.15; emacs 24.5.1 From: Brandon J. Wandersee To: Manish Jain Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is alacarte ever going to be fixed ? In-reply-to: Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 08:56:58 -0600 Message-ID: <86io247ccl.fsf@WorkBox.Home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 15:20:59 -0000 Manish Jain writes: > Hi all, > > While FreeBSD (10.2 amd64, in my case) is looking more and more of what > an ideal OS should be, I wish the hiccup with alacarte is somehow fixed. > For at least the last 3 FreeBSD+GNOME releases I have tried, trying to > launch alacarte yields something like the following greeting : > > # alacarte > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/local/bin/alacarte", line 21, in > from Alacarte.MainWindow import main > ImportError: No module named 'Alacarte' This is something you should take up with the port maintainer. You won't get any answer here. Also, what is a "FreeBSD+GNOME release?" FreeBSD doesn't include any graphical stuff... -- ================================================================= :: Brandon Wandersee :: :: brandon.wandersee@gmail.com :: ================================================================== From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Feb 4 15:21:03 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45B1A99916 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 15:21:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com (mail-wm0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F3D71899; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 15:21:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x230.google.com with SMTP id r129so216827415wmr.0; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 07:21:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=kqL8aCCoqjPmp5QSIErLRYwVu2PwPx8ltG1jushSam8=; b=c5xY1RjkscGo2IsOp4tOR8GLlepgaNjazzzrknM6kFuNuGRW1zJ4ZJe1k/3+1m1CZc 92s5ZvQk2msleje2sYNw28U01rT2kL/sivCDtIw5ICDaMRaK6nc4B2eml+X0Hb6GX8eT 6p1rT3FVqySmsr5pbWJxX1UcaOkGEsqg/TFOFZ6MDhXcB1GoxFKxBRJTOTkv3DPs4RmC y9xVeHN/KVkZUoLX4efznwgIeAcs2ND0U9tdqYp0ME/KBrSKyWeWYAIqNMv16pG7Ovdn PJBYBIvKWpxWvUQ6AmzmPtkAY1x/BRQYVTVm5HYcqQa3nrrF4CB2cqCtvm3pnGYjWlaW johg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=kqL8aCCoqjPmp5QSIErLRYwVu2PwPx8ltG1jushSam8=; b=O3oOgy6ViF82udMQ8onVF05uKK0DysYhyWsIEZ49xdr3VgzbuOItq6+uaAvqMQkwOh Xhy+d19YLwrif1zQprqw9j2ZX8NZOxoGnlDVEwZ0rPL+/ZTpU9CtYzpTviF0xk3FU8hO VyI0vLlSQy3Z34qVOu/xX2QllH/o3cWODIRnItmBaeF5oUvKSDRqadkVFk1r+dxBKKFX xX+jsm7peft+1VtT6gEH6QYRFZvAPfZUiqfwCiNfTgffiI38U8Y8qlr6aHOv/4UXbskp NU0RBroIKE2Xy1/WefUaD+GJiMhyvMsj68ANzTgGqiygfVooEFlvmNCfcMwWKN7c+QaK cErw== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOT3Ew9URukduXmYhi6iLDR2N65ybAYgc8tPw0WT/ZhbV+TQohMv6sAS9HnkIsuhlVhphUscxKwhfxNyQA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.117.5 with SMTP id ka5mr9058354wjb.20.1454599261855; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 07:21:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.28.55.132 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 07:21:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <86lh707dbr.fsf@WorkBox.Home> References: <56B30C42.1030006@FreeBSD.org> <86lh707dbr.fsf@WorkBox.Home> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 15:21:01 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Migrating ZFS on Linux pools to FreeBSD From: krad To: "Brandon J. Wandersee" Cc: Matthew Seaman , FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 15:21:04 -0000 to add a bit more, both kernels use the same zfs core code, as do most illumos based OS's. So there shouldn't be compatibility issues as others have said as long as the feature flags supported by the kernel are = or > the pool versions. http://open-zfs.org/wiki/Main_Page On 4 February 2016 at 14:35, Brandon J. Wandersee < brandon.wandersee@gmail.com> wrote: > > Matthew Seaman writes: > > >> I understand FreeBSD's ZFS implementation is more mature and pre-dates > >> the Linux port, and some web searches indicate the two may not be > >> entirely compatible. > > To add to what Matthew said: if FreeBSD uses a more recent version of > zpool, and you run `zpool upgrade` on FreeBSD, I presume that would be a > point of no return. And while I can't say for certain--since I've never > tried it--actively sharing a single zpool between two operating systems > might be a bit of a pain. You'd need to export the pool from one system > and then import it to the other on every boot, no? > > In short, permanently moving a pool from Linux to FreeBSD shouldn't be > any hassle. Moving in the other direction, however... > > -- > ================================================================= > :: Brandon Wandersee :: > :: brandon.wandersee@gmail.com :: > ================================================================== > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Feb 4 15:33:56 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DC4BA9B05C for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 15:33:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com (mail-wm0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAB5B6C2 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 15:33:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id p63so122712688wmp.1 for ; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 07:33:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=NzP061J2PTnK9RQC8uKJMcWH5t63xehS32IFQ/yL/nw=; b=RalN739eggL9UWGthUb+NWZVmNWWBdajGR84Y+NzMFA11wyiTyhDC+zO2fsLxyZqFE v5kuhncAY8sr114YaFkwV87PTnv62Er2kEr/JE5cTzUqIN7cjgupjPZ2saLoE3k5NrF6 ldkAL+eNUlIyecIMLSuYibcaKvxPnrPDjwgWPHwVkGRKXQFOYpNeyXVscS5AnIbLwSy6 pNyRfuf18uRF+zmf+DEYj6glneNVZ2nz81XUKRr05de5n8j/6WDoZ2XtItK2KA8N/st/ TtoHNQ5CVFwHqM8prd1CqHaTF9Qs8aJeTUs4Ihy13lg5WNh05c/6cO4cR2FfVdv2+W80 kIkw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=NzP061J2PTnK9RQC8uKJMcWH5t63xehS32IFQ/yL/nw=; b=fjk1YLuFLrBkSy5FYXvrNaiS26R15wHh+C87YYpKKI4Awjq+RKJSMS0xE4OIzzls6x SwM6gFZnAOQbHa6dTBlcVxL04/4Wc0Z/BILW8cOLefXFYzUIRDPtv+465dfrnMvH+GrX TihuXX6tiFg3mMpJyH1F7rSN87bOSz1dJkFNycsNXlaOkivbDaSuJEAeaDAztE+F+kps /jx38cSRiL4Fti42WuIEoMkvscFR2dhuJD5dKV5aqhLUFeejz+/nUGuwBwODIAlHj2pM H3GE0nte5SNS16grOv0GJLX8xpUktWQJBHgIDUjJIbvnbFCyO63kQYDNYAMRx6IQ/X1J C08Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQhSM5QtG2CMjJFAS3/F1X3ea47fhLKKT9hUWhrsC436S2G+hLtPnKlpPtdvnq/JzGDoujVDwtJ0p7qGQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.28.32.147 with SMTP id g141mr31128712wmg.19.1454600034190; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 07:33:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.28.55.132 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 07:33:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20160203213414.GB60231@rancor.immure.com> References: <20160203213414.GB60231@rancor.immure.com> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 15:33:54 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Switch from legacy to UEFI boot?? From: krad To: Bob Willcox Cc: questions list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 15:33:56 -0000 The conversion I did was pretty easy, but then I was starting from a GPT layout in the 1st place. I basically unmounted swap, stole 100M from the 4G partition, remounted swap, and then dd'd the /boot/boot1.efifat file to the new small partition. rebooted and all came up. I was doing this from the latest stable though. Just make sure you have performed a "svnup stable" in the last few days and done a source upgrade and you should be good. It is possible to convert a MBR layout to GPT, but it does require downtime and backup as if you get it wrong you could easily loose your partitions On 3 February 2016 at 21:34, Bob Willcox wrote: > Is there a way to convert a system from legacy boot to UEFI boot? I have > an > Intel NUC5i7RYH and I can get it to boot ok in legacy boot mode but only > if I > go into the BIOS and manually select the partition. It (the BIOS) won't > automatically boot from it. Tells me there's no boot device. > > Thanks, > Bob > > -- > Bob Willcox | > bob@immure.com | Entropy isn't what it used to be. > Austin, TX | > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Feb 4 15:53:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E398A9BACB for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 15:53:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@gmx.com) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDA5A1A71 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 15:53:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@gmx.com) Received: from moby.local ([91.140.53.232]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M55BC-1a8AXy3oLO-00zGCH for ; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 16:47:41 +0100 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Questions" From: Nikos Vassiliadis Subject: pkg(8) doesn't work properly in chroot anymore Message-ID: <56B37252.8070406@gmx.com> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 17:46:26 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:LNDf9bjau5h7dczoD0Ugb6M7laRDp1WBRwxPeRrIJDL1ohFDICC lIZzT+2jrQEhjyJiglCTt93cIZsgauB3/oSXvuAmHd9jlGRcqeNY7acVZkSzLdome1M3kIJ t1U7byK1K2y9wpR3AYtfyKlIzwAmH89InYWH3Jl8xe38fQTgjDc06H7xfMWuoFfp8pKtFUg hud0iSQFGmGOYRoW7i0pQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:2qc8aVR79e8=:7opQbbszN6amB9NY0nhrPY Qgty1V0HXuZrQen59WduoR+CXvNZ9TNy72Qh5iI7YwcMF9jBjVgxoT1yPdqdlZnb9akHLtmu0 ldUyeS5ePdVdOIQEDPEGL/kEXcvN9howz9oqAs+2TraiYPiYjx5m4VkPHfoFWKYhRWQ7zkX+z SUJvUWH069zkTHdN3ARQQ1vbeCY+pXyAA680ZyH/2TvMct6j5S/ByXZmol/r1p77xJRJGtkH4 VLwza87Mfs1XUozhxk9CWE5HMDKg+abzHII+8wG9y3IbF3GangAjd59eWMes0nPeMuN7dwvA3 TtL99prxVfnQvBgdDR3j2SvHonGtO/6sttgS+wuQxIGeurd5+AhYM8cYdbnPTcvjyUQvmA3k3 PAzupDtr/DIpCLugjk7vXTLPySS6m2/GXrIFWbSqzSiAD1BsyXGT2tTkS5bOFOV2BDoKdqZ+T rbn3NDqlY/IZ4d4It5zC8y4gRTTy2lP5ciPb9GZJg01BhAsEIQJ66duA3mD8AQgXfPDeLAiqI jts0hFLyb7f6mYiwdoYfDpBr+eYmfpOlbOP/KHxjLDpZLwjD3wajztDrM85RiQiHcGGwq2UJs 1rpL5/1EDqlU57NApfYj1lup0+CV2rLwWGDaMvfXXJCa0+E/OMQJh5WL+efibS82+fH4Ygl2E fJZxPx9HJdFyCA23PDaOHZSzetxBd9VXHUuKZ5twsn4dzKOU1OxrHnFnT52y8m88fM2pdcJ8t 5G+LgDelGNn3+4Q2S9es3r2corKsOgXh+9BhlOSLZrur5H9hBFLUeQaBA1VOiwf9g+8q/epyL Obfebxn X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 15:53:02 -0000 Hi, I have several jails and in one of them pkg doesn't seem to function properly anymore > root@clio:~ # pkg -c /jails/sa/ info > pkg-1.6.2 Package manager > root@clio:~ # or > root@clio:~ # chroot /jails/sa/ pkg info > pkg-1.6.2 Package manager > root@clio:~ # This is not true. There is a spamassassin installation in that jail. Thanks in advance for any ideas, Nikos From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Feb 4 15:57:20 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1979A9BDDF for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 15:57:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com (mail-wm0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 762DB1E70 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 15:57:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: by mail-wm0-x230.google.com with SMTP id p63so218526252wmp.1 for ; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 07:57:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=khera.org; s=google11; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=4GvGOW1TWFW/bKTHauCxgjMLjS/fYytKMz339J9jCg0=; b=QJIsctlQiI1t1JbcSsB80t8awSCZLx2CI9pkBMhc3NZpunTWlGQxNGssbQ9msNvMi7 ran5OdHPLM08ReIzYQJHRD8COxnR+b5/qfzVf1m7JPwQlGOR1y1FmAeMwrCOtTxQrs/1 Njk86gIdGAh6mhyfB+NkixyWWd033nFbzGBOk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=4GvGOW1TWFW/bKTHauCxgjMLjS/fYytKMz339J9jCg0=; b=XiF8HbBpnqZvyaOzKy9sncJOy1Izy/nhFoJu8Z1eNOCNxrKS4Wc0aTfnqHfcUC9W6J p7sN8RUPc90VX/ZKODC81SH7nZW9kOR2M+WsscAnYzZQ1u3+LipvBWN8uN+ny6kQYXUM 1dINhTxAjKxqrW2O8skV1btbfX75GSLuXOm9f49Qx9mvvWjLFqGqi1D1UkoGiRC2hpsJ TN5BcuN8VSuPV8/aAvjlP5m4JJETMVH9P8do/z5cARpr4LXI32YS5EoNJ2ZhHA9RynEt kkkALcvgbaiHvnujHPLgwpz7Zw5ExcW0A0W2OTVyW/XMOVbNiY+v7UTEwUtyFrL+pdnI xb6A== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQ3N+N1TcHtZDHB4pyf2vCrUf6G0ZEddl+LntH7IWriyn1wB0i2EbrBd535PTLhwym+yhqhXBelVsDbZQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.21.101 with SMTP id u5mr10419573wje.53.1454601438785; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 07:57:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.28.33.5 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 07:57:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1270648257.999240.1454452891099.JavaMail.zimbra@uoguelph.ca> References: <201602021848.u12ImDES067799@gw.catspoiler.org> <1270648257.999240.1454452891099.JavaMail.zimbra@uoguelph.ca> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 10:57:18 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: NFS unstable with high load on server From: Vick Khera To: Rick Macklem Cc: Don Lewis , spork@bway.net, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 15:57:21 -0000 On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Rick Macklem wrote: > I recently had a report that "-S" would get stuck for a long time before > performing an update of the exports when the server is under heavy load. > I don't think this affects many people, but the attached 2-line patch (not > yet in head) fixes the problem for the guy that reported it. > The -S flag does indeed seem to clear it up. The NFS is stable again, and I'm not seeing any long delays (at least yet in my initial attempts to make it fail). Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Feb 4 16:08:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C2BA735BD for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 16:08:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCA81CB6 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 16:08:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com (no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u14G48wW053998 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 16:04:15 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=infracaninophile.co.uk DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk u14G48wW053998 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1454601855; bh=KNOYn1xRuRqEKZervwS2HKkTtX4lygXiT8HDjlunszc=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; z=Subject:=20Re:=20pkg(8)=20doesn't=20work=20properly=20in=20chroot =20anymore|To:=20freebsd-questions@freebsd.org|References:=20<56B3 7252.8070406@gmx.com>|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman=20|Date:=20Thu,=204=20Feb=202016=2016:04:02=20+0000| In-Reply-To:=20<56B37252.8070406@gmx.com>; b=gBBYvd/b0DpUihflduUD47E0CCf/lrZR8YufjQ6rB8tRxz3LDn0qT+8KEjgO47XUc hstPDg9uTKIhyJSucBAx8t4Ac1NnLetvKPcqLqdDpg3G4HNV9pVdXwTyKZPnBl5rBe CcKg7ADi2gZJWZwkFE1ozYfK2LcdAYcSnDYGdN4M= X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged) claimed to be ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com Subject: Re: pkg(8) doesn't work properly in chroot anymore To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <56B37252.8070406@gmx.com> From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <56B37672.8040805@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 16:04:02 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56B37252.8070406@gmx.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XQ4AtdeubOMWpFQDsiiBj5xGHoPjbbXvB" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 16:08:19 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --XQ4AtdeubOMWpFQDsiiBj5xGHoPjbbXvB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/04/16 15:46, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > I have several jails and in one of them pkg doesn't seem > to function properly anymore >=20 >=20 >> root@clio:~ # pkg -c /jails/sa/ info >> pkg-1.6.2 Package manager >> root@clio:~ # >=20 > or >=20 >> root@clio:~ # chroot /jails/sa/ pkg info >> pkg-1.6.2 Package manager >> root@clio:~ # >=20 > This is not true. There is a spamassassin installation in that jail. >=20 This suggests that the pkg database in /jails/sa/var/db/pkg has been trashed. Check in /jails/sa/var/backup to see if there is a usable backup you might be able to revert to. Failing that, if you know what should have been installed in that jail, just reinstall it all and restart the jail. Matthew --XQ4AtdeubOMWpFQDsiiBj5xGHoPjbbXvB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWs3Z3AAoJEABRPxDgqeTnIoYQALViZFFkX4YQtRj1Z3Mqdwbl cFzT38QxU24srvMzAJivuwps6Ns0VRgFqq1CJ/g3RgsCHtPW5+mr8V+E4PkKmLfG Z9zbbixBzvm02yLaTEtnOeQdhIOu9oquZL54OE5HvBTWKWPNMnrvOBE42q9AoM2H bI1QjY5YUR+Zg1KMM3OmB3AHerPAdFa4QkpxvR6lpqsQdProjQtyJ6iI6dpVEsWD uIRpfxzV0Af6EiTm0/8RQ3WB+Iw/HVOJwBOHwjIgDsQBnsHCscMfJgSVborFvR7k 8tvUyeHar1yFgYVAyKAlUQFUnf2XgCxD1MxcLMwdnl7MfrwI/9kuBkZsCx4HpSVI IS2RBvikj3hjrU8myryVoitqAhwDv7r8MpO2DbSW+4C665jD2k/vnhSuJ2D9kc7x rrwx2d+bVw7qq1iMio9oWE15MKTFM6Tp7gyfOCazRelIT2HmG0HE87QxjlkHuFI2 elR17lE5TjMDo4wB2UwCzxYWemNAlWh6tk+3OdoC+UTNV1Eqsmx1BNN7fSCjd4Lc z6qLXQAVHvoqjGHQ4OyhSO6S4+zA6O80by/4Fs/jg7peE0S7dcDCUfgjDsu6jz/S DEqpWFI4/RzFXEjKl7J/tmV1frffI2VNTVaMjebEajf8deT4OzLFitcSz4QPeXl3 BU/HCcKWXz5NJii6nJBS =nCOg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XQ4AtdeubOMWpFQDsiiBj5xGHoPjbbXvB-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Feb 4 17:02:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C96F5A9BEFA for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 17:02:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@gmx.com) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C4681938 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 17:02:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@gmx.com) Received: from moby.local ([91.140.53.232]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lkiqm-1Zt8T33inE-00aStH; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 18:01:58 +0100 Subject: Re: pkg(8) doesn't work properly in chroot anymore To: Matthew Seaman , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <56B37252.8070406@gmx.com> <56B37672.8040805@infracaninophile.co.uk> From: Nikos Vassiliadis Message-ID: <56B383C1.50307@gmx.com> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 19:00:49 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56B37672.8040805@infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:H3YhAnHvHVrS4bdNAoHm82ohjmQE+XA6LxyTNMN0JFalapnIKjc aYjxNqRX3tygfiDORiTj+wOeEgHf5o/R9u5mYATjSz5SKOkPGs+Uadr7gEUCcw9XG301NxM axFVkYZe7cnBd2ptK6Nnmrm21yW4ayPrOFgaBPxTnRQGF5toMYlw0DgKqoQRoYSmXQ6hfv+ BsecSTu+//X4OlP4rIJhg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:wG0zLQ992Yo=:3BwidaiuQQ6nW9t7qvXKXX RBcVUb2awzy2j0FhDtmot+PJhbmlSUiDML+bewHjE2LtEepSH9Ydu1V08B5jUxtbGqv5+9UPE UUp8Q/1fGGiLXY7LnrTOwzWpgQ3lvi8jv7CV6EWFbqWntptXid+561FPM20k8NCQqNJGYg7oM 8gKDKCO6C1DCCK8aXgOM93UOVCTAWdGb5D7veh1l+1+H/GxfIBi7D4iDn8xQLB6HhWOBtglqL W3R3tRnagZUQAXhHoDcC5bjwcZSGK9OojNCxbuuDNmqAnAKIWzat6qCD9vVCZelwcszZ9KIQI BKf4mJAatqGbtA3r9xnjIxvEOnSnXzzHgI0dHd2LEzLI60r9PgSyQN84UgmXZdRg0YfFLMlaa cBNp95KeSD7fQYqEgn6Ex5BtrGy0lOh0x9YDtanxrFoO6X0oqXekowkFqiuFxYaFU+y4QWz3+ kRJDDmQt9Xnmvacq2vikO2fn0AuhpdWEYZybh61k8RabSH4c3VwL+SzjNHbhaD7/HF6HTcrnQ ZdBy8ofZCR3n4h1gImXSOjbJmqrCneNPfJ1VgdX8jlVcHoo76NlH812J1Q+9ZJt1QgF28CMsv 1sUaG+nZj31Qpxzi04DnMTFgGMchxqnOjBaUacqZioXW+DNiEjSSCARohfyBrfPj+uDh7vFIl ErRp9+xa6lDVX2rDc9X53fSyDFZiNO7J4cJyZ2MyP3tNl60Fwcu4+LLEc8mkvfF+16dRpDiR9 w97i4u5mYXubH1v7QFlB9vyswm2+l/PKonn71gtoTmtTkXunBIvShUDaHijy/1bzlSJXny8yL QEQRKsw X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 17:02:00 -0000 On 02/04/16 18:04, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 02/04/16 15:46, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: >> I have several jails and in one of them pkg doesn't seem >> to function properly anymore >> >> >>> root@clio:~ # pkg -c /jails/sa/ info >>> pkg-1.6.2 Package manager >>> root@clio:~ # >> >> or >> >>> root@clio:~ # chroot /jails/sa/ pkg info >>> pkg-1.6.2 Package manager >>> root@clio:~ # >> >> This is not true. There is a spamassassin installation in that jail. >> > > This suggests that the pkg database in /jails/sa/var/db/pkg has been > trashed. Check in /jails/sa/var/backup to see if there is a usable > backup you might be able to revert to. > > Failing that, if you know what should have been installed in that jail, > just reinstall it all and restart the jail. > > Matthew After a closer examination of all ZFS snapshots and all var/backups/pkg* files, I realized that it was just my mistake. That jail was just cloned from the jail template but SA was never installed/configured. Thanks and sorry for the noise, Nikos From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Feb 4 17:04:10 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CBB1A9C0DD for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 17:04:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from bede.qeng-ho.org (bede.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org", Issuer "fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BF551BEC for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 17:04:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from arthur.home.qeng-ho.org (arthur.home.qeng-ho.org [172.23.1.2]) by bede.home.qeng-ho.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u14GtrE2044748; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 16:55:53 GMT (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Subject: Re: Switch from legacy to UEFI boot?? To: "Brandon J. Wandersee" References: <20160203213414.GB60231@rancor.immure.com> <56B353E5.9080605@fechner.net> <86k2mk7cmz.fsf@WorkBox.Home> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Arthur Chance Message-ID: <56B38299.7030800@qeng-ho.org> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 16:55:53 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <86k2mk7cmz.fsf@WorkBox.Home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 17:04:10 -0000 On 04/02/2016 14:50, Brandon J. Wandersee wrote: > > Trond EndrestÞl writes: > >> On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 14:36+0100, Matthias Fechner wrote: >>> >>> is it true that currently the EFI loaded cannot boot a ZFS root? >> >> As of r294999, stable/10's boot1.efi and loader.efi is able to boot >> ZFS. Both boot1.efi and loader.efi takes the bootfs property into >> consideration... Maybe you should wait until the next stable/10 >> snapshot is available... > > The ZFS-compatible EFI loader is expected to be ready for 10.3-RELEASE, > which is scheduled for about six weeks from now.[1] It may be a bit more > or less time than that, depending on how things go, but the first beta > snapshot of 10.3 (which is cut from 10-STABLE) is set to be built > tomorrow. If you don't want to run a development branch, you won't have > much longer to wait. Though once that change happens, you'd have to back > up your data and reconfigure your boot scheme to make use of > ZFS-compatible UEFI booting. > > [1]: https://www.freebsd.org/releases/10.3R/schedule.html > I currently have a pure ZFS system with boot environments which I currently boot using BIOS compatibility mode. Will I just be able to switch to UEFI boot under 10.3? Is the EFI loader smart enough to find boot environments for itself, or do we have to flag them in some fashion? -- Moore's Law of Mad Science: Every eighteen months, the minimum IQ necessary to destroy the world drops by one point. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Feb 4 17:23:35 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFECCA9C8AB for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 17:23:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97820C2B for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 17:23:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com (no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u14HNRVf013742 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 17:23:27 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=infracaninophile.co.uk DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk u14HNRVf013742 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1454606607; bh=JVPrtBqPhlbbICqrFWFlWcTAykn/hCW/f4b3hzfxJ6s=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; z=Subject:=20Re:=20pkg(8)=20doesn't=20work=20properly=20in=20chroot =20anymore|To:=20freebsd-questions@freebsd.org|References:=20<56B3 7252.8070406@gmx.com>|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman=20|Date:=20Thu,=204=20Feb=202016=2017:23:26=20+0000| In-Reply-To:=20<56B37252.8070406@gmx.com>; b=WkGNM1CCsvMGEGe/GJa9kGyswZ2htXBpm23xljeKcDBaYER5WZ+ggQmvVnPMff5nj imGM1um8w4tcrwiH51w+spOA14nPFvfvJ1qGBgGKB1e/fOFqncsK+hpWkBma/rshA7 PNs7etSdg0wMxnfWUwumjH17UmhHao4Hpn/y2eAM= X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged) claimed to be ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com Subject: Re: pkg(8) doesn't work properly in chroot anymore To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <56B37252.8070406@gmx.com> From: Matthew Seaman X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <56B3890E.3060107@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 17:23:26 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56B37252.8070406@gmx.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="E91i0RsJx1D5CFSEXAUAU7XxAtlelIB8i" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DCC_CHECK,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 17:23:35 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --E91i0RsJx1D5CFSEXAUAU7XxAtlelIB8i Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/04/16 15:46, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > I have several jails and in one of them pkg doesn't seem > to function properly anymore >=20 >=20 >> root@clio:~ # pkg -c /jails/sa/ info >> pkg-1.6.2 Package manager >> root@clio:~ # >=20 > or >=20 >> root@clio:~ # chroot /jails/sa/ pkg info >> pkg-1.6.2 Package manager >> root@clio:~ # >=20 > This is not true. There is a spamassassin installation in that jail. >=20 This suggests that the pkg database in /jails/sa/var/db/pkg has been trashed. Check in /jails/sa/var/backup to see if there is a usable backup you might be able to revert to. Failing that, if you know what should have been installed in that jail, just reinstall it all and restart the jail. Matthew --E91i0RsJx1D5CFSEXAUAU7XxAtlelIB8i Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWs4kOAAoJEABRPxDgqeTnnS8QAKsrHSEQzvOwAmq6HbDQ/yc0 h/KXu35+jaQvdutMy2eDDViimbujtlrLPtmpG8CN7aT0LEFGST28dOaJ/5o1zVFu bn2L37NZt9UuNHJZyokzsZ4QUEL7ujNXQG1uwsSV3x0AP/4aiRWfagqoqZ6kjRnx z+QcT85otiED5cp13qhKyocxYokaqZkZ0KZtZVR6I2xCqvrafqabh7/+vUJO2Q+8 U3OwaKIReMogGZp77nim6CabCqejZ2oYgHZE6VZkj9+gItDb6ZbA2bRz/VnK9Avl Iu5/3cO/ZJ1DdEOA0GLG9tTyN7vZRZtarTDlOGDku2LmkRrt3zeWN9mOU0QFS0pi zzJj4tw9p9JfLg0m0obrbP4BBQJ3wVKjayovLVpQml89sTplduEhRqGAGor+5po9 Fb7MXDduPHGt76kh92vUWL1G86KDGeXgekM28+O4MbMKvaarD4RiVY3K7WLfNRga fZ96Z99Wp0yKhcaiIXnmo0BSxNMsIl86NGV+rh7Sub8RUM+AKCnN4JePFCNOxQDM +HKY0S1X0B28XAQEH8Bk554XgZ/qQMV7qMO5dx2Grtsr3RV4JVhxVy6xz4cd88zU HYfpxmcJBTU8GeOsvO/Peo1RSgl/mWCcsdOKre/DOe/jfqo58gndHu7gQV06X139 c7JHdPfYILmN3w8mtESY =pSHZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --E91i0RsJx1D5CFSEXAUAU7XxAtlelIB8i-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Feb 4 17:24:26 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 452E5A9C973 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 17:24:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 180D4DD4 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 17:24:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u14HOOKs018903 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 4 Feb 2016 10:24:24 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u14HOOhB018900; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 10:24:24 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 10:24:24 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: "Forsyth, Emily B." cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Index In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 04 Feb 2016 10:24:25 -0700 (MST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 17:24:26 -0000 On Tue, 2 Feb 2016, Forsyth, Emily B. wrote: > Very new to DocBook5 and the language used. I'm creating a set of documents and want to include an Index, but trying to figure out the indexing method, I'm not having very much luck. Can someone please guide me? Are you using the FreeBSD document toolchain? If so, see https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/fdp-primer/ Otherwise, there are DocBook mailing lists and possibly something more specific for the exact toolchain in use. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Feb 4 17:29:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92BBEA9CB97 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 17:29:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 652F410E6 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 17:29:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u14HTI9V020121 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 4 Feb 2016 10:29:18 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u14HTISf020118; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 10:29:18 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 10:29:18 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: "Forsyth, Emily B." cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Index In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 04 Feb 2016 10:29:18 -0700 (MST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 17:29:19 -0000 On Thu, 4 Feb 2016, Warren Block wrote: > On Tue, 2 Feb 2016, Forsyth, Emily B. wrote: > >> Very new to DocBook5 and the language used. I'm creating a set of >> documents and want to include an Index, but trying to figure out the >> indexing method, I'm not having very much luck. Can someone please guide >> me? > > Are you using the FreeBSD document toolchain? If so, see > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/fdp-primer/ > > Otherwise, there are DocBook mailing lists and possibly something more > specific for the exact toolchain in use. Which, now that I think about it, does not really answer the question. We use to mark out terms. For example: TrueType Fonts fonts TrueType This creates two entries in the index: fonts TrueType fonts, (link) ... TrueType fonts, (link) The index is built by the toolchain, so that procedure depends on the platform and toolchain being used. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Feb 4 17:48:54 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 943F8A9C2F5 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 17:48:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sergeig.public@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk0-x234.google.com (mail-vk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57D931CCC for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 17:48:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sergeig.public@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk0-x234.google.com with SMTP id e6so41090280vkh.2 for ; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 09:48:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=0zNNw3ppQoPmKMWR+Z3S8OU5Ggfa930L3MuAEYVLimc=; b=GvgaqxZKPRz7zrPlcUBG6vIpkgcIzlBXbU7oBzo3FSIR1LoljrBgt6ll7pO/Mk1dGd 8CMT4N1xtObwUQ74VfyEw4EuL/Me2ZiUE0x6GXS7ra/HX28o9neX6XRXoR3lDpzNKWfZ U2Omoyakp3qSuRf8TW8+zmMm1j2fLAky4JUiZYVqxi1S6RLURCrIE3Kq8LXNW4GDUwZs qJIMcx6us5pozYBLJmP5akPCnPKKpncTIX52Bv9elwmOhKYqgmV2RIL0LBTmylXoxkN5 Ue5erjjJ0m8emJ5Za0kaV5FpABHRFK99Brup0evnAGtNi6K8zpTCcCXw/IlIOpZsdjtr CXsg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=0zNNw3ppQoPmKMWR+Z3S8OU5Ggfa930L3MuAEYVLimc=; b=ECH7xpKFOwSeHSJEWD1Fxk+rTgK97YxF/2cnfhm3/BHbrsongnkpbAC39T6JL0/BXH i2xIs1SfkUGn3+E//xb5belblCFPZVXngM2orSaWkxobN9Z+NX26RoG2IHshU00kcYyE jnPdsQ9KrOcEoC1uAZWwg91iMiXHRyXiKfyg6tN/Cer2q50ixed21DRdYRkbPjndzHiK paEa984j3k79J+Mia5QYAjznJVAX9nMnmuQs5OEVMp0Dj0u9xzz/HkOpOXimQ7cPK3hj k+fBNItBj29ijyd6clZsYxuhOs+0y0bzRlPE9le1qX1nEFX6MCFZ+pFL5XJNZz8TfeHC zBgg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOT3REy7UdS49Wm8e/CoThjiXJpogKiRIPgkCRQwIUk/3COXgw+EdtG9hVFNxWpuy9g/0DWUblqfLMnFXw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.31.0.215 with SMTP id 206mr6308645vka.22.1454608133091; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 09:48:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.31.174.132 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 09:48:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 09:48:53 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: confused about dump/restore levels From: Sergei G To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 17:48:54 -0000 Hi, I had to use my backup to restore the system and it generally worked. However, I run into an issue that made me question if I understood dump right. On Feb 1 I had a level 0 backup of root file system. On Feb 2 and Feb 3 I had level 2 backups of the same file system. In all cases I used newfs prior to restore. I then tried to restore (Case A): Feb 1 Level 0, ok Feb 3 Level 2, reported errors (don't error message; got prompt y/n, then message with option to abort and report core dump) I tried again (Case B): Feb 1 Level 0, ok Feb 2 Level 2, ok Feb 3 Level 2, error: Incremental dump too high So, I got my system restored, but I am confused why Feb 3 backup did not restore in Case A. It has nothing to do with corrupted files, because I had the same issue on other file system and it worked the same way. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Feb 4 18:02:48 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F2B6A9C76E for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 18:02:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D283D34F for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 18:02:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@freebsd.org) Received: from ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com (no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u14I2Zsi090477 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 18:02:35 GMT (envelope-from matthew@freebsd.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=freebsd.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk u14I2Zsi090477 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/u14I2Zsi090477; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged) claimed to be ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com Subject: Re: confused about dump/restore levels To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <56B3923A.5080707@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 18:02:34 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wWvHQukpwVjFA9VXTow42I8aHnw8Q5L92" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 18:02:48 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --wWvHQukpwVjFA9VXTow42I8aHnw8Q5L92 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/04/16 17:48, Sergei G wrote: > I tried again (Case B): >=20 > Feb 1 Level 0, ok > Feb 2 Level 2, ok > Feb 3 Level 2, error: Incremental dump too high >=20 > So, I got my system restored, but I am confused why Feb 3 backup did no= t > restore in Case A. >=20 Your level-2 dump is an incremental since the previous *lower* level dump -- which is the Feb 1st level 0 in this case. So if you'ld restored in this order: Feb 1 Level 0 Feb 3 Level 2 it should all have worked correctly. Cheers, Matthew --wWvHQukpwVjFA9VXTow42I8aHnw8Q5L92 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWs5I7AAoJEABRPxDgqeTnS2sP/316y8yrtpBNP1RPSJuGkjGb WrBZGkIndoDTlc8IVni9RkWeFGDU1kF4kW2kjPFUXPk0xNQMRZr0iiEwWekNaSWB U399Tpo0EhxW41i0Y/kMrjRKiELyS7SAKenBhO+hUZ0EqqFrcTc8nNGcdoNaqzPg TKldZuBdczM2YCnW5+jJrBl4onKqQwZbIjBUmGKZw/d71UR/x3nC8iT58Ji4vSb/ TtTOohoruT7jrvz6bJJ+3WdcXcvcSdYDg5PBqExBEid/5WiRyRDW53P7H77KVnw8 Zo3vpOOAIe3zebS3R0D7TQfa4UU7PCPy7pPCG0FPQZmYpKzlqFfUv3JThF4flets 8bz2btVUg8nS05/Qn0W1wbs89P+O5GgnVucftuGdILW0bQqesAQIwWb1zVJotGNo j/v4YtQJUCA6W1fpFlg1DlYMVPuuA4hFJlS2dfJ6unW8yh+J8frsG3Kg82XYw4gb 7yFeorbRDADYVID8rDhwdgqJFKC8IaVOsC01FKh6+F3vor22M/5eLeDANNYFwUoD H8f0LabWgMAhP94tLoCMmlYXBxNomXK1jX1ntQxMkxHpONhZbFJv6sF4Y6dZpNCy mUSFWNeKsRKm7wjlpLjOUVC4AN7ek4IhDtOtNeCqWW4CNuFJ9bfozeztZp0RWF/i ocGO/lIpGSZo5nZHAtjg =exeR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wWvHQukpwVjFA9VXTow42I8aHnw8Q5L92-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Feb 4 18:08:45 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E67BA9C9E8 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 18:08:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C908DBD5 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 18:08:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com (no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u14I8eF1090623 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 18:08:40 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=infracaninophile.co.uk DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk u14I8eF1090623 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1454609320; bh=+bCnTjExXrSvX1mmZdBF1YV8Z9yDQt5cWaEV0jJ2RJw=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; z=Subject:=20Re:=20confused=20about=20dump/restore=20levels|To:=20f reebsd-questions@freebsd.org|References:=20=0D=0A=20<56B3923A.50 80707@freebsd.org>|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman=20|Date:=20Thu,=204=20Feb=202016=2018:08:40=20+0000|In- Reply-To:=20<56B3923A.5080707@freebsd.org>; b=OVCdpu0QTAanjBylxPX3fKb7C8WQTz3uEOLlfDAeG9ZFUpYTuODicha5OrltvnjKQ 6kPEZI2pPfuhut6es3w0iSk8BFPJXl6YCDIyeDVLJqom1LzYBehtEJ6ADLV/aR3Htl ViB9ffXrr0dSByqZDawPjbFCvmuzKK9VSTDUHiqA= X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged) claimed to be ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com Subject: Re: confused about dump/restore levels To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <56B3923A.5080707@freebsd.org> From: Matthew Seaman X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <56B393A8.1000109@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 18:08:40 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56B3923A.5080707@freebsd.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="F6SFCfqE4lwlLtKxLtjNqpa6XXL1Pcxpl" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 18:08:45 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --F6SFCfqE4lwlLtKxLtjNqpa6XXL1Pcxpl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/04/16 18:02, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 02/04/16 17:48, Sergei G wrote: >> I tried again (Case B): >> >> Feb 1 Level 0, ok >> Feb 2 Level 2, ok >> Feb 3 Level 2, error: Incremental dump too high >> >> So, I got my system restored, but I am confused why Feb 3 backup did n= ot >> restore in Case A. >> >=20 > Your level-2 dump is an incremental since the previous *lower* level > dump -- which is the Feb 1st level 0 in this case. So if you'ld restore= d > in this order: >=20 > Feb 1 Level 0 > Feb 3 Level 2 >=20 > it should all have worked correctly. Of course, you already did that. D'Oh! You weren't doing anything wrong in your Case A scenario. It just looks like the Feb 3rd backup failed. I'd be testing my backups at htis point to try and work out if that was an isolated incident or whether there is a systematic problem with the backup regime. Congratulations, by the way, on actually having backups. Further congratulations on having backups that you could actually restore from, even if it didn't all go entirely to plan. Cheers, Matthew --F6SFCfqE4lwlLtKxLtjNqpa6XXL1Pcxpl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWs5OoAAoJEABRPxDgqeTntWoP/Ref9BOZw7xUeZk/4oIyzctG HsnBhrfoyme2OkG/PJqgSv/zyLUaCSsMRnvZF6RqpgYvKwWawV0b5rxCWtaT4t1R GcxJucAuN1DdNV99riU+KCmjWnU5l97Pgn1tehpHa0lU02uIDR1dtHWpG2u4sxg0 qjJSk3Oq2yrarK3hKrkT6wcdqzsgPW5jBsriet9Gbc10lDSlAqc4LCAeQn51BgY5 VYBe061NGRuPybdHATjt9DmX13T3rgDgP2QAB+x3wGYBzvEYt0CKMIuHd21DjxM0 AvB2//hn/boFj9UVn0thVXR+XwtFAwvg3OVFBkOiMPAUbrWc5F7bCC8N6+ArWcs/ 0hK0Pev6Nmd3aBMmvsWOkAdV3LvAxI08soxUdXAEG7fcP5prjmlVTt/Sqq8JVklO 6VEMH3NGcRmh4nAW4gJU4UbXvyU0QG5FeFU5W3bJIrGNg1YMMV2VKIm9DSelm+zf ZKjU6ECS8PcImO/ZJ+g2NmBXj0aH9A2pJ1xSCQBp8BcvhmLFAfD9yIkR5r37jny+ UxBIzHzsjKYhKYjCIF/02JGXVOCzMfSLyGjCdTZ3SPVoS4BUh55EGzx086KGlwbP KIQteSdGqzZ8Oac03dkQLnk099Dlu09LgnINt+X8+85WGKiqtAgC5nG18SqWxyvM 3wU+Z8yI5bPNXrXs93fg =1QEN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --F6SFCfqE4lwlLtKxLtjNqpa6XXL1Pcxpl-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Feb 4 20:56:07 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F07BA9B92C; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 20:56:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73B9912E3; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 20:56:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from kabini1.local (dynamic-216-186-244-25.knology.net [216.186.244.25] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id u14Ku4Cc018431 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 4 Feb 2016 14:56:05 -0600 To: FreeBSD ports list !!!! , FreeBSD Questions !!!! From: "William A. Mahaffey III" Subject: rxvt question Message-ID: <56B3BAE3.1080103@hiwaay.net> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 15:01:33 -0553.75 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 20:56:07 -0000 I have been using rxvt w/ XFCE under FreeBSD 9.3R for CLI tasks on my daily-driver desktop for about 18 mos. now, love it. Since I use this box for web access as well as LAN access to other boxen on my LAN, it doesn't get refreshed very often, since I like the continuity of being able to return to tasks by just clicking back to the window I was working in earlier. I always have 4 desktops, with about a dozen RXVT shells each open in 2 of the desktops, sometimes a few more, usually a few xterms as well. The other 2 desktops are used for GUI stuff, browsers, e-mail client, etc. I did a full system upgrade this A.M. (freebsd-update + 'pkg upgrade -y') & rebooted & logged back in. I have noticed over the last few months that whenever I log out & back in, most of the RXVT windows are re-opened as they were when I logged out, fonts OK, text rendered OK, etc., but some are recreated in an oddball state such that when I open them up to full screen size, they still render text in only about 70 columns, rather than full 132-ish. I usually just shut those windows & open new ones, since I always use them 'full screen'. This A.M., when I clicked on the 'RXVT shell' button on my desktop lower menu, nothing happened. I tried from the CLI of another open shell & same story: [wam@kabini1, ~, 10:17:07am] 301 % hrxvt 107 9:00 ( rxvt -sl 5000 -fn -*-lucidatypewriter-bold-r-normal-sans-17-*-100-100-*-100-*-* & ) 108 9:00 ( rxvt -rv & ) 109 9:00 rxvt -sl 5000 -title "System Terminal" -fg red -bg darkred -e su -l root 110 9:00 rxvt -sl 5000 -title "System Terminal" -fg red -bg black -e su -l root 301 10:18 hrxvt [wam@kabini1, ~, 10:18:35am] 302 % !107 ( rxvt -sl 5000 -fn -*-lucidatypewriter-bold-r-normal-sans-17-*-100-100-*-100-*-* & ) [wam@kabini1, ~, 10:18:43am] 303 % rxvt: No match. [wam@kabini1, ~, 10:18:46am] 303 % [wam@kabini1, ~, 10:18:46am] 303 % [wam@kabini1, ~, 10:18:46am] 303 % which rxvt /usr/local/bin/rxvt [wam@kabini1, ~, 10:18:51am] 304 % ( /usr/local/bin/rxvt -sl 5000 -fn -*-lucidatypewriter-bold-r-normal-sans-17-*-100-100-*-100-*-* & ) [wam@kabini1, ~, 10:19:06am] 305 % /usr/local/bin/rxvt: No match. [wam@kabini1, ~, 10:19:07am] 305 % [wam@kabini1, ~, 10:19:07am] 305 % [wam@kabini1, ~, 10:19:08am] 305 % These lines were typed in *after* I tried the menu button on my XFCE desktop. I only log out & back in as needed, often many weeks or months between logins, so I am not sure exactly when this might have started :-/. [wam@kabini1, ~, 10:19:08am] 305 % uname -a FreeBSD kabini1.local 9.3-RELEASE-p33 FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p33 #0: Wed Jan 13 17:55:39 UTC 2016 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 [wam@kabini1, ~, 2:50:46pm] 306 % rxvt-2.6.4_6, xfce-4.12_1, everything fresh as of this A.M. Is rxvt still actively maintained ? Known/thought to work OK w/ XFCE ? Any other issues/gotchas ? Pilot error ? Any clues appreciated, any info needed just ask. TIA & have a good one. -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Feb 4 21:14:45 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F4DA9C13D for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 21:14:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com (mail-wm0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D95DE4 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 21:14:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id p63so899949wmp.1 for ; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 13:14:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=3RyLQxCkqcbyazy8JpYRLNdbtDjfMdebtJOmr8oCepI=; b=Lr+1+L89DuMh5pWY3EjuiuCfokqYJzi35Hs+Eh78Mns0iIq0KBw2CfMm4bZQmfZJWO wk6/jJpfCfv+vnBVC5VuFx3Qg5fq0vo7YGS9um4pIQOshV91R/+nAOoOxFfVhNvxt6aq l0nqlqC0DLgrXv2Jb6ZUnIdaWTsPSAjqOT9MnVCHm0phBAsXkFZ7I/wv+gPhRdAZRUpY /nSt8q+boTG4tQ8Ma8We4f49563D+Xye2K2oLTAX19L2QFSBngwrm/rlHL6pqtrIYjfX ah79EJ1FApaAShNVPd/UNc2uHEvU0SZhGHCv0PT0/vUa/ObqYvot6dtlnK9IyvBzL5zO mFFw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=3RyLQxCkqcbyazy8JpYRLNdbtDjfMdebtJOmr8oCepI=; b=ONm2h9S4mg1bLjom9FkMyvjiQpbzIg1MaL8Ux+BzipPqSfa91gH2LmZv8YPsHKVbXj tdjY4s7UvVnGH2KlBn/4Tf2//Un1WOLB5NULRTu4MnElbzw6ag2bQKWHrqT7MNlhIsY/ N1+ZWxtvTl82iugNDEivfxqZfCeC0QxQ4vcvTBlMyoazzo3MgvS7YVKAgyHrrzb3SQUg lUu2nNL304vhiWoCwM7Jie52Mm7U7RAY77Y3vjbT8pmY+vgk4UQRPDStxHCx0TPJ3VUj vSMrSOEqMKHKaeHcaUwllhP5Zm/wFBynHzo//9rLqXijFPJP3mV9pFmuanxxGksqxiyR 3KFw== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORd0NfyhcJrwbVRMr9vbhVEWzyLVUiRw7NUs/KTxRii5T9kjzslh2AuIyLe9NWjlW8PNnnz2yZpcsmZ7Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.103.164 with SMTP id fx4mr10484688wjb.56.1454620482963; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 13:14:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.28.55.132 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 13:14:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <56B38299.7030800@qeng-ho.org> References: <20160203213414.GB60231@rancor.immure.com> <56B353E5.9080605@fechner.net> <86k2mk7cmz.fsf@WorkBox.Home> <56B38299.7030800@qeng-ho.org> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 21:14:42 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Switch from legacy to UEFI boot?? From: krad To: Arthur Chance Cc: "Brandon J. Wandersee" , FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 21:14:45 -0000 *you will need a small efi partition on the b*oot drive. You should still have the option to bios boot as well. here is a layout from one of my systems. You can see I trimmed the space from swap $ gpart show ada0 =3D> 34 117231341 ada0 GPT (56G) 34 1024 1 freebsd-boot (512K) 1058 6 - free - (3.0K) 1064 262144 2 efi (128M) 263208 3932154 4 freebsd-swap (1.9G) 4195362 113036013 3 freebsd-zfs (54G) On 4 February 2016 at 16:55, Arthur Chance wrote: > On 04/02/2016 14:50, Brandon J. Wandersee wrote: > >> >> Trond Endrest=C3=B8l writes: >> >> On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 14:36+0100, Matthias Fechner wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> is it true that currently the EFI loaded cannot boot a ZFS root? >>>> >>> >>> As of r294999, stable/10's boot1.efi and loader.efi is able to boot >>> ZFS. Both boot1.efi and loader.efi takes the bootfs property into >>> consideration... Maybe you should wait until the next stable/10 >>> snapshot is available... >>> >> >> The ZFS-compatible EFI loader is expected to be ready for 10.3-RELEASE, >> which is scheduled for about six weeks from now.[1] It may be a bit more >> or less time than that, depending on how things go, but the first beta >> snapshot of 10.3 (which is cut from 10-STABLE) is set to be built >> tomorrow. If you don't want to run a development branch, you won't have >> much longer to wait. Though once that change happens, you'd have to back >> up your data and reconfigure your boot scheme to make use of >> ZFS-compatible UEFI booting. >> >> [1]: https://www.freebsd.org/releases/10.3R/schedule.html >> >> > I currently have a pure ZFS system with boot environments which I > currently boot using BIOS compatibility mode. Will I just be able to swit= ch > to UEFI boot under 10.3? Is the EFI loader smart enough to find boot > environments for itself, or do we have to flag them in some fashion? > > -- > Moore's Law of Mad Science: Every eighteen months, the minimum IQ > necessary to destroy the world drops by one point. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Feb 4 21:36:26 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83607A9C80B; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 21:36:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fonz@skysmurf.nl) Received: from spectrum.skysmurf.nl (spectrum.skysmurf.nl [83.162.175.214]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2114F133D; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 21:36:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fonz@skysmurf.nl) Received: from spectrum.skysmurf.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spectrum.skysmurf.nl (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u14LaGIp049553; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 22:36:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from fonz@spectrum.skysmurf.nl) Received: (from fonz@localhost) by spectrum.skysmurf.nl (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id u14LaGsE049552; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 22:36:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from fonz) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 22:36:16 +0100 From: "A.J. \"Fonz\" van Werven" To: "William A. Mahaffey III" Cc: FreeBSD ports list !!!! , FreeBSD Questions !!!! Subject: Re: rxvt question Message-ID: <20160204213616.GA49527@biertje.skysmurf.nl> References: <56B3BAE3.1080103@hiwaay.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ibTvN161/egqYuK8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56B3BAE3.1080103@hiwaay.net> X-PGP-Key: http://www.skysmurf.nl/~fonz/fonz_pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 21:36:26 -0000 --ibTvN161/egqYuK8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > ( rxvt -sl 5000 -fn > -*-lucidatypewriter-bold-r-normal-sans-17-*-100-100-*-100-*-* & ) > [wam@kabini1, ~, 10:18:43am] 303 % rxvt: No match. Try escaping the asterisks in the font string. HTH, Fonz --=20 I'm not completely useless, I can be used as a bad example. --ibTvN161/egqYuK8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWs8RPAAoJEAfP7gJTaCe8ra8QAJkpUnGTo2WAU2g/mE0H31YC 92eAxoMMpYMGMtqRyihkApWeJYaOoPVlvBBJmYVRNOaI81H47YOeggXH3pXNmpd5 /YwqokmORpY1KcQH2wCXkjx5apO3rQbMWdU1UHB8qKNxUnC7xhS+JZdO+feaDIIH kGaPTuSagc0OfMwbnL4XqCNHANVm3UEXnAu/FtAsqCQW13IfFX4rGW0IZnBqb06e s6jBDW88+i8tjdJr0iVtK65XIRoSl7CiQuytWnKt3sSEb1UwPN9fqfTOv2VsKw6T njPwXJbIy2jrUPvuoYWSZzgc32Q0Vke0GEjj1+tEjKAcsQzGYwnFddWqBge05iPc Lp7Gs3oN9zzYX+rALmpRvnLo4EUbFbOntCrTu9azmkMlmIncvcFaP2JVocpOa4v9 9VktZznyrSZ5P45xME/PpG/bLICdXu02tkXFQ1nsyWG99ulHbAJziIDc/knMn/BZ k42Hk1AVS+ZnV8pYFbVZqVt/yNqLmxSA9XL7jzT5N3jgv8COdedIqEoUgN8KKezT 9YPh7+e71y5i2umW2o/kBxXp3MxpkFTy8IJwlQkH3X7JRIvpB2+TU7OsxlRg4D/R jjXXtNr2APGF2IfR2LqNwap2k1bw8YwV5zcEDp8lYA86/JXFW2NWG1zRd+dgRaok fGVWH+88nDvYiih0mxMx =4T2N -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ibTvN161/egqYuK8-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Feb 4 22:03:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E48F3A9C21B for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 22:03:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daniel.jenkins@1bestdata.com) Received: from mail.1bestdata.com (mail.1bestdata.com [191.101.235.236]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D866E1076 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 22:03:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daniel.jenkins@1bestdata.com) Received: from VOXTIDE (unknown [106.51.136.95]) by mail.1bestdata.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C504CEA637 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 13:14:12 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 mail.1bestdata.com C504CEA637 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=1bestdata.com; s=default; t=1454609653; bh=sQvdA/LlLjJ9fdyDtGBUTnAU93Od5JOyw+K0ycjDnAA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=WYdmssK7aCA7PhhOVQhZ0Df2vUsfS3B+Ebs3UIhab98h6huvWypq2y+9QDiS8sZ8k BArMDx5t+IFOvmVd1cGz+dxsgkhL97u1epb0qnPEUSucDLk60TVKAiCz3661PaW1vA MYxjMUiRc5geohSyWkMEK2kZhvaUAlWnprUfwBQU= From: "Daniel Jenkins" To: Subject: Customized SAP User Detail For Your Marketing Initiatives Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 23:43:09 +0530 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AdFfd5FscUavHFDlQwCJAsA++G/gIQ== Content-Language: en-us Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 22:03:24 -0000 Hello, Quickly wanted to check and see if you have had a chance to review my previous e-mail sent on 29th January about SAP CRM Users Contacts. Awaiting your response and thoughts Best Regards, Daniel Jenkins Marketing Executive - Data Appending| Email Campaigns| Email marketing |B2B Email List _____ Hello, I hope you are the right person to discuss regarding our SAP User Details Database for your Marketing Initiatives like Email Marketing, Email Campaign and Direct mailings? Database Available : SAP Users: - SAP ERP, SAP HANA, SAP Business Intelligence, SAP HRMS, SAP SCPM, SAP SUPM, SAP EWM, SAP Success Factors, SAP ABAP Users and many more. Other Technology Users: - Microsoft Dynamic, Oracle, Cisco, Citrix, VMware, Net Suite, Net App, Sugar CRM, IBM, AVAYA, Sales force, SAGE, EPICOR, INFOR, Rack Space Users and many more. Please do share your target audience like Industry / Geography / Job title, So that we can give you more information about our services, we can also provide you counts, price with a sample list to check the fields available Best Regards, Daniel Jenkins 1 Best Data Marketing Executive - Data Appending| Email Campaigns| Email marketing |B2B Email List _____ If you do not wish to receive further emails kindly reply with "Leave Out" or "Unsubscribe" From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Feb 4 23:09:03 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB27A9D8B8; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 23:09:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47AFF1D44; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 23:09:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from kabini1.local (dynamic-216-186-244-25.knology.net [216.186.244.25] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id u14N90KI012186 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 4 Feb 2016 17:09:01 -0600 Subject: Re: rxvt question References: <56B3BAE3.1080103@hiwaay.net> <20160204213616.GA49527@biertje.skysmurf.nl> Cc: FreeBSD Questions !!!! , FreeBSD ports list !!!! From: "William A. Mahaffey III" Message-ID: <56B3DA0C.8040309@hiwaay.net> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 17:14:30 -0553.75 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160204213616.GA49527@biertje.skysmurf.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 23:09:03 -0000 On 02/04/16 15:42, A.J. "Fonz" van Werven wrote: > William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > >> ( rxvt -sl 5000 -fn >> -*-lucidatypewriter-bold-r-normal-sans-17-*-100-100-*-100-*-* & ) >> [wam@kabini1, ~, 10:18:43am] 303 % rxvt: No match. > Try escaping the asterisks in the font string. > > HTH, > > Fonz > *DING DING DING DING* !!!! We have a winner !!!! Thanks :-) P.S. Damn I hate it when I do stuff like that .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Feb 4 23:20:22 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEBACA9DC9E; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 23:20:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B69A253; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 23:20:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from kabini1.local (dynamic-216-186-244-25.knology.net [216.186.244.25] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id u14NKKjE017941 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 4 Feb 2016 17:20:21 -0600 Subject: Re: rxvt question Cc: FreeBSD Questions !!!! , FreeBSD ports list !!!! References: <56B3BAE3.1080103@hiwaay.net> <20160204213616.GA49527@biertje.skysmurf.nl> <56B3DA0C.8040309@hiwaay.net> From: "William A. Mahaffey III" Message-ID: <56B3DCB4.8050204@hiwaay.net> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 17:25:50 -0553.75 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56B3DA0C.8040309@hiwaay.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 23:20:23 -0000 On 02/04/16 17:13, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > On 02/04/16 15:42, A.J. "Fonz" van Werven wrote: >> William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> >>> ( rxvt -sl 5000 -fn >>> -*-lucidatypewriter-bold-r-normal-sans-17-*-100-100-*-100-*-* & ) >>> [wam@kabini1, ~, 10:18:43am] 303 % rxvt: No match. >> Try escaping the asterisks in the font string. >> >> HTH, >> >> Fonz >> > > > *DING DING DING DING* !!!! We have a winner !!!! Thanks :-) > > > P.S. Damn I hate it when I do stuff like that .... > & to close this off properly, the '-maximized' argument is no longer recognized by rxvt (used to work AOK :-/ ), which was messing up my invocation from the XFCE menu. *Whew* !!!! -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Feb 5 01:26:22 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1F89A9DB13 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 01:26:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@schamschula.com) Received: from homiemail-a61.g.dreamhost.com (homie.mail.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.208]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF72B11AD for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 01:26:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@schamschula.com) Received: from homiemail-a61.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a61.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B070457807B for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 17:26:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=schamschula.com; h=from :content-type:subject:message-id:date:to:mime-version; s= schamschula.com; bh=g6vifHukEKdLmDSFwyC8uj0L3nc=; b=fcV9NRS/eJ4T dDbNxN1EfP/zOB4yyF50MneD96w9wsiJ0w/Q9rY9Za33NKvoI6a9KiOntLMlXTmj vtJ2bBDlJh8F9ddY8DJs9mvmFMS2C5vyeAe31R3Eo7d6D/wRw6nONEjL0ApRAHoL g/WkyLN4Mz5MC8uAMr3D7RG6sGcrVaY= Received: from [10.0.1.75] (173-26-108-176.client.mchsi.com [173.26.108.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lists@schamschula.com) by homiemail-a61.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5CD12578059 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 17:26:16 -0800 (PST) From: Marius Schamschula Subject: mysql57 upgrade issue Message-Id: <71862CB3-F0C9-4981-9730-2C1054C3E572@schamschula.com> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 19:26:16 -0600 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 01:26:23 -0000 While running portmaster I found this failure: =3D=3D=3D> Registering installation for mysql57-client-5.7.10_2 Installing mysql57-client-5.7.10_2... pkg-static: mysql57-client-5.7.10_2 conflicts with = mysql57-server-5.7.10_1 (installs files into the same place). = Problematic file: /usr/local/include/mysql/binary_log_types.h *** Error code 70 Stop. What to do? Manually, uninstall mysql57-server-5.7.10_1? Marius -- Marius Schamschula From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Feb 5 01:46:33 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4A89A9C05F for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 01:46:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amijaresp@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A21C1AB8 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 01:46:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amijaresp@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 98FFEA9C05E; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 01:46:33 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9895FA9C05D for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 01:46:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amijaresp@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yk0-x22c.google.com (mail-yk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CFA11AB7 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 01:46:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amijaresp@gmail.com) Received: by mail-yk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id u9so53542848ykd.1 for ; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 17:46:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=vE20UHl4KZw4xcO15eac+m1n5EtT5qMSQJal+8dUth0=; b=mxf9MyparBIRD9LWQlqX4akYTAXFcG/x87C6jfy8RILMp9ijftRi7yFlyNIkbrIb8H cPiWwZ0cl2m+8jKcRaIQMdqKnDRjACMj/Q3V3m/NLvZaIlqsm+C04q4yLqWEKFklZLhj dBU3tXd6JErRDfKITMCVJ5XwTlLqNdielk7driw0fEm0Sz3+kdYqXY6E3Ib+VRk/BKq4 O+NDlekrAMe8r9hFQ7KDQP6M/uqexMrPW9L5sC0Omn6rA1YUGVUgVEaXvaf6VQUHKGB/ WVPCYjj6aew3oz3dPThyu4fK43Ee0cdR1svm02x8Cs8tqXYkfqxfP3EQjLBzPHMm4k9k 6EqQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=vE20UHl4KZw4xcO15eac+m1n5EtT5qMSQJal+8dUth0=; b=WEWERnXWpaFEkBkSRov+q6ECYMXoUiz9g1Bk2xm77fPDxZkxApqVz4LLO6vYS+SS/G 7ovkPEfwsfPRZscpOvlHwFwBZjstoklJxc7WpzoHdm86yjtDsLLi47Dxf0ttsYBHxXvD 4az7vDzwq01RmCtD8QKTo2sAjmOi+pdMYqfGUxJmAs8Y5e2qOy/K8BNQrVzKI4Xn8ERs 4pNee55mXuK5/RbzAX8hLbp8JCpkjemNW89b7tRTEhUWLQU7tTICa12FtPE6AID6y0rG ey4lioEtDD5at94Xr6B3Z/+Cjpcz2Csjg0gkmZTObMw7ENn/6fALQZzQYWrFFGP200PP Ag2Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSxRiu8ZAu8zJ7+ZP1+jPwnn/73ta52dQzUavN1/+kM6cmykIWpPJ7l9D/kSB5lJBxgYAN051jgWSYcZA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.37.37.69 with SMTP id l66mr5845230ybl.12.1454636792420; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 17:46:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.129.74.4 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 17:46:32 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 21:16:32 -0430 Message-ID: Subject: Sendmail submission as client From: Alberto Mijares To: "questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 01:46:33 -0000 Hi guys, I'm working on FreeBSD 10.2 amd64, Sendmail 8.15.2. This are the changes I've made so far: define(`SMART_HOST', `relay.domain.tld') define(`RELAY_MAILER_ARGS', `TCP $h 587') FEATURE(`authinfo') MASQUERADE_AS(`my.domai.tld') FEATURE(`masquerade_envelope') the file /etc/mail/authinfo has this line: AuthInfo:relay.domain.tld "U:user" "P=base64encodedpassword" "M:PLAIN LOGIN" and created the hash with # cd /etc/mail; makemap hash authinfo.db < authinfo; make restart However, when sending mail, the server relay.domain.tld says: 530 5.5.1 Invalid command: Must issue an AUTH command first So, Sendmail is not sending credentials, is not honoring authinfo feature. This is a configuration I've accomplished before, long time ago, so I wonder if anything has changed from that time (about 3 years). Any hint on how to debug this issue? Thanks in advance, Alberto Mijares From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Feb 5 09:37:15 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19068A76FD9 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 09:37:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jedrzejczak.michal@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com (mail-wm0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A66D13E6 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 09:37:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jedrzejczak.michal@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id r129so18282901wmr.0 for ; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 01:37:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ZZuaoGXZvcKrHypIXg9jAGvHXBD180I5QDBvuHD58UU=; b=YZ2h2/wNAz53YQmziPGlYQXi+nkaxYBRGixBzqGzTWZvmL9sHPqHXVUtewWRzQ2Ro0 kxmLprd/k3R83IdQnf3FB25dNfNldsYmZVCFdtWSDLY2ruc2fB7dybUO8lhJDV1sj0Ow 3nq54SOv8p9Rtbhc7balClAtJmQohtYsvaAh2ENFqj0+ODZWgqpmi2WbDPyEEhkfFD5f t+IgR3E4yR6o0bY8AAjrfXrCZNYzYqj5NEhJWc761P7c4m4BeQ7+2Hcn0yM39qnfU7k6 DXz+fHwrCUx4R/O5HFPHoLbIla/rt1hahScFSezC1H3/lDvE6Ur1XYZUbmZwtTRpy12s SMOQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ZZuaoGXZvcKrHypIXg9jAGvHXBD180I5QDBvuHD58UU=; b=McEXO8lz+/mNf+vrcA0lXzHt20fEAIMjrK/F5CWBCXfiW/f5iXX5sDjMGlIunOtNN6 TQPWIAfTqvMlJ8cf05KZW0HhbDLmjOVbuGE/MSs0tkdImmLj9bBVw+g4AcNpLYsMbCBo /jm/DLsq6UqE3sR0RCWwI8FVEh7Kkj1P3DbSDoMuPe67TujFT2JU/rRDx7IRDNnkPluy S41RxPcdak0/BbMwovS+XbdwlZeMFwZUaMFR4VscwiB2be6gsbSnqqYJTLlgLTTG3tdx nRJrxcoxlHEjx8qJ8WDWroz/RNKCcQHBBPzVOPfqzubXWofdZJh9uqyIrs5tk8Ly6CgY qsGQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQ7HYFjMVP1JQ5ToJ+22RAWEg3OVuDtOfOujJp7fetWe6j/lMSemBKrF7W7iYZaDY4NVVuBg3No7IMjAA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.238.162 with SMTP id vl2mr12419298wjc.91.1454665033209; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 01:37:13 -0800 (PST) Sender: jedrzejczak.michal@gmail.com Received: by 10.194.250.102 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 01:37:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <71862CB3-F0C9-4981-9730-2C1054C3E572@schamschula.com> References: <71862CB3-F0C9-4981-9730-2C1054C3E572@schamschula.com> Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 10:37:13 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0sCAE5MPIoT93vaT9NdvH6xTmTw Message-ID: Subject: Re: mysql57 upgrade issue From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBKxJlkcnplamN6YWs=?= To: Marius Schamschula Cc: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 09:37:15 -0000 Hi Try this : pkg delete -x mysql57-client pkg install -x mysql57-client Cheers 2016-02-05 2:26 GMT+01:00 Marius Schamschula : > While running portmaster I found this failure: > > ===> Registering installation for mysql57-client-5.7.10_2 > Installing mysql57-client-5.7.10_2... > pkg-static: mysql57-client-5.7.10_2 conflicts with mysql57-server-5.7.10_1 > (installs files into the same place). Problematic file: > /usr/local/include/mysql/binary_log_types.h > *** Error code 70 > > Stop. > > What to do? Manually, uninstall mysql57-server-5.7.10_1? > > Marius > -- > Marius Schamschula > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Feb 5 09:57:37 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B346A77672 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 09:57:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no (smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no [IPv6:2001:700:1100:1:200:ff:fe00:b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no", Issuer "Fagskolen i Gj??vik" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 805F010C9 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 09:57:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from mail.fig.ol.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u159vTGS021609 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 5 Feb 2016 10:57:30 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from localhost (trond@localhost) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u159vTJa021606; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 10:57:29 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fig.ol.no: trond owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 10:57:29 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= Sender: Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no To: Marius Schamschula cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mysql57 upgrade issue In-Reply-To: <71862CB3-F0C9-4981-9730-2C1054C3E572@schamschula.com> Message-ID: References: <71862CB3-F0C9-4981-9730-2C1054C3E572@schamschula.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) Organization: Fagskolen Innlandet OpenPGP: url=http://fig.ol.no/~trond/trond.key MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, AWL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail.fig.ol.no Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 09:57:37 -0000 On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 19:26-0600, Marius Schamschula wrote: > While running portmaster I found this failure: > > ===> Registering installation for mysql57-client-5.7.10_2 > Installing mysql57-client-5.7.10_2... > pkg-static: mysql57-client-5.7.10_2 conflicts with mysql57-server-5.7.10_1 (installs files into the same place). Problematic file: /usr/local/include/mysql/binary_log_types.h > *** Error code 70 > > Stop. > > What to do? Manually, uninstall mysql57-server-5.7.10_1? I'm using portupgrade, and I had to update databases/mysql57-server prior to databases/mysql57-client. Something along these lines: portupgrade -fprv databases/mysql57-server portupgrade -fprv databases/mysql57-client -- +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, | | Trond Endrestøl, | Trond Endrestøl, | | IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, | | Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gjøvik Technical College, Norway, | | tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, | | sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. | +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Feb 5 13:42:37 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A04E09D9DE9 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 13:42:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@schamschula.com) Received: from homiemail-a37.g.dreamhost.com (homie.mail.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.208]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B13D1D5B for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 13:42:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@schamschula.com) Received: from homiemail-a37.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a37.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C485208061; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 05:42:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=schamschula.com; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; s=schamschula.com; bh=BR4Uaenr5moAzcL jfg3lQaJhm8w=; b=B0LAVqet+2cf3Sct6sUuZDhX1MAqXTRa+i8IC4tOsTQZgQ8 1FPs18bO+2ll+yRnhwn7U8HExV+j5ultQAefMAWiNnI/7RYySs6FvpXYxEF1Vohq ArVY19QtHBOttLycHrn3QymXC32OT7qZPH6fiKXo5Ov75bwkguFbvrMx1IGs= Received: from [10.0.1.75] (173-26-108-176.client.mchsi.com [173.26.108.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lists@schamschula.com) by homiemail-a37.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A7BA1208073; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 05:42:35 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: mysql57 upgrade issue From: Marius Schamschula In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 07:42:37 -0600 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <9EE3E5E5-F717-4536-9EEB-C0CD07A190A8@schamschula.com> References: <71862CB3-F0C9-4981-9730-2C1054C3E572@schamschula.com> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 13:42:37 -0000 Trond, Apparently there is something amiss here, I probably should open a = ticket. portupgrade -fprv databases/mysql57-server databases/mysql57-client also failed with the same error, just leaving mysql57-client = uninstalled. I ended up running the following: cd /usr/ports/databases/mysql57-server=20 make deinstall make install This left me with a working mysql-client/server-5.7.10_2 On Feb 5, 2016, at 3:57 AM, Trond Endrest=F8l = wrote: > On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 19:26-0600, Marius Schamschula wrote: >=20 >> While running portmaster I found this failure: >>=20 >> =3D=3D=3D> Registering installation for mysql57-client-5.7.10_2 >> Installing mysql57-client-5.7.10_2... >> pkg-static: mysql57-client-5.7.10_2 conflicts with = mysql57-server-5.7.10_1 (installs files into the same place). = Problematic file: /usr/local/include/mysql/binary_log_types.h >> *** Error code 70 >>=20 >> Stop. >>=20 >> What to do? Manually, uninstall mysql57-server-5.7.10_1? >=20 > I'm using portupgrade, and I had to update databases/mysql57-server=20 > prior to databases/mysql57-client. >=20 > Something along these lines: >=20 > portupgrade -fprv databases/mysql57-server > portupgrade -fprv databases/mysql57-client >=20 > --=20 > +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ > | Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, | > | Trond Endrest=F8l, | Trond Endrest=F8l, = | > | IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, | > | Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gj=F8vik Technical College, Norway, = | > | tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, | > | sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. | > +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ Marius -- Marius Schamschula From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Feb 5 14:21:40 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB8FCA76A60 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 14:21:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no (smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no [IPv6:2001:700:1100:1:200:ff:fe00:b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no", Issuer "Fagskolen i Gj??vik" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 570361277 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 14:21:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from mail.fig.ol.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u15ELVAD022567 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 5 Feb 2016 15:21:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from localhost (trond@localhost) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u15ELVMB022564; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 15:21:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fig.ol.no: trond owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 15:21:31 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= Sender: Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no To: Marius Schamschula cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mysql57 upgrade issue In-Reply-To: <9EE3E5E5-F717-4536-9EEB-C0CD07A190A8@schamschula.com> Message-ID: References: <71862CB3-F0C9-4981-9730-2C1054C3E572@schamschula.com> <9EE3E5E5-F717-4536-9EEB-C0CD07A190A8@schamschula.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) Organization: Fagskolen Innlandet OpenPGP: url=http://fig.ol.no/~trond/trond.key MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, AWL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail.fig.ol.no Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 14:21:41 -0000 On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 07:42-0600, Marius Schamschula wrote: > Trond, > > Apparently there is something amiss here, I probably should open a ticket. > > portupgrade -fprv databases/mysql57-server databases/mysql57-client You can't run that as a single invocation. portupgrade would then determine that upgrading the client should precede the upgrading of the server, and you'll be back at square one. > also failed with the same error, just leaving mysql57-client uninstalled. > > I ended up running the following: > > cd /usr/ports/databases/mysql57-server > > make deinstall > make install > > This left me with a working mysql-client/server-5.7.10_2 > > On Feb 5, 2016, at 3:57 AM, Trond Endrestøl wrote: > > > On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 19:26-0600, Marius Schamschula wrote: > > > >> While running portmaster I found this failure: > >> > >> ===> Registering installation for mysql57-client-5.7.10_2 > >> Installing mysql57-client-5.7.10_2... > >> pkg-static: mysql57-client-5.7.10_2 conflicts with mysql57-server-5.7.10_1 (installs files into the same place). Problematic file: /usr/local/include/mysql/binary_log_types.h > >> *** Error code 70 > >> > >> Stop. > >> > >> What to do? Manually, uninstall mysql57-server-5.7.10_1? > > > > I'm using portupgrade, and I had to update databases/mysql57-server > > prior to databases/mysql57-client. > > > > Something along these lines: > > > > portupgrade -fprv databases/mysql57-server > > portupgrade -fprv databases/mysql57-client -- +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, | | Trond Endrestøl, | Trond Endrestøl, | | IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, | | Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gjøvik Technical College, Norway, | | tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, | | sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. | +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Feb 5 18:20:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFEEEA9D817 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 18:20:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sergeig.public@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk0-x22f.google.com (mail-vk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C9491C38 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 18:20:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sergeig.public@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id c3so15246361vkb.3 for ; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 10:20:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=6KTTo8diorUhtYW/pNSpkAaXLjZLRaS2wDZTLWIjFWc=; b=crhSPvImBkiri/Cm7NrORGWcHcZrV0TpYEtea0Czum1hNrZ9kly74DqQkUMngnq0PU /ieNU7SuRAewEgxSeXMclxsT9s1OZCCtS0NldU9qFV3q+zd26VQzT/xke8gcQgteiMCT eedRiTlVkfqIkz2hHgdaVm1Wucr4hG88z9FjBkZrxXgFZgMdrYZoX6ex1psg3MGG2N8V 6KLd2EJcA5fovb4uHsnejpcdTdwviistpMen4ECh/PcvHru14GKIOMe7kxBdYMgo2mnd RjA3oDALJcf4TZM9BH02AvOBvpvGBhOL/2ROboLGk4+5RQW4vMC2h6tk7cZvebfZP5a2 j5Sg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=6KTTo8diorUhtYW/pNSpkAaXLjZLRaS2wDZTLWIjFWc=; b=cb+eZoVxbUPaC38R2+CzBJaivj1wGeEdAhWXFGj1lEf9RN5UQ06DHrgZzor2z2gyz0 zP5MjiK21TrYW4tHHTgP/JJppLbvEyW1LPMdfIZ4352B9VmQ3XY91mUK+hVPF7Tadlr0 R8R4sJU1j6XwOvjfsPWv+wIC0m/YpB5piUoI8RQ+lzTPBcJxM5P/HfZb/vNOHfh6byVd tweYz3XJhyhag+IaF7eq/Szfo4glEaQq89wiQrl5+ISlL+DdiB3zmNZ0totlzZ+7M8LA tNIRc48hqNfc4IZHbiscqUvVEx0OBaJeN331qMwFCQsfwY5txAQU/gX7Ya4DkkofDai5 +GWg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSQQ+ZmEMpC/Zn7F+fKxZJ9EmbAtEHw3lUQCccEw4GYIcCZCrdBAAhBenmDB9xCBKwk0YHv9UvB3kjbOw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.31.0.215 with SMTP id 206mr10662598vka.22.1454696422442; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 10:20:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.31.174.132 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 10:20:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 10:20:22 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: A: ezjail to qjail migration From: Sergei G To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 18:20:23 -0000 FYI If for watever (in)sane reason you need to migrate your ezjail installation to qjail, here is what appears have worked for me. * stop jails * pkg remove ezjail * comment out your jail related, IP management related /etc/rc.conf entries * move content of /usr/jails/ to some other location. I moved it to /mnt, because of the file system remount. * pkg install qjail (not qjail2) * qjail install Actual jail migration I created a Makefile (it is my personal preference due to ease of named parameters, auto quit on error and ability to create new task quickly) in /usr/jails Here is a relevant Makefile content: name=noname lip=254 oldjails=oldjails oldname=$(name) n=n default: cat Makefile # create jail create: qjail create -n bce0 -4 192.168.3.$(lip) $(name) # make sync oldname=... name=... n= old=/mnt/$(oldname) sync: rsync -aAXSH$(n)v --log-file=sync-$(name).log --exclude-from=sync-excl.txt $(old)/etc $(old)/root $(old)/tmp $(old)/usr $(old)/var $(name) # push update to jail s-resolv: -rm $(name)/etc/resolv.conf cp flavors/hnet/etc/resolv.conf $(name)/etc/resolv.conf And important rsync exclusions file: cat sync-excl.txt /sbin /libexec /sys /lib /usr/libdata /usr/libexec /usr/src /usr/include /usr/bin /usr/share /usr/sbin /usr/lib32 /usr/lib /usr/ports /bin /etc/rc.conf /etc/periodic.conf /etc/resolv.conf For example, if I have wiki-hnet jail in /mnt/wiki-hnet-old and I want to create a new jail wiki-hnet on the same 192.168.3.11 IP I will do: 1. create qjails jail with: make create lip=11 name=wiki-hnet 2. now I need to merge content of wiki-hnet-old jail from /mnt/wiki-hnet-old into new jail: test run: make sync oldname=wiki-hnet-old name=wiki-hnet real run: make sync oldname=wiki-hnet-old name=wiki-hnet n= That uses rsync to copy files, but excludes list of shared jailed directories. Last 3 items in sync-excl.txt are files that I added, because of my configuration differences and need to do manual merge. I had to copy reolv.conf file enough times that there is a custom make target for that: make s-resolv name=wiki-hnet which copies content from flavor directory. The variables have defaults to prevent destruction in case you forget a value. It seems to work for me on fully updated FreeBSD 10.2 release. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Feb 6 00:52:48 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56F11A9E8DC for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2016 00:52:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from www.raymondmalekian@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-x22f.google.com (mail-pa0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E3D2321 for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2016 00:52:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from www.raymondmalekian@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pa0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id cy9so42406468pac.0 for ; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 16:52:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=3g6EqdYRB9EMfWnWkbcvzhMazVKin3Hj5SVNDlBrF8k=; b=KkIaV5DCs0aQp8rArDjnQvV4fzVOP5ptJ8uH7vGJUKMDORdrEEstAqcWkA1/vd8GvH s66O1dMFKe5+S3DRsSo7iHPXKQnZYeq/ltM9bRKrbCM64vPJu/tGict07ZnikQ41Rs+6 ffFd+Hl6fn9gXyMJ3rcZqnUTygOjrG6OGAeSQeiwxI1Zh1J6n2HULmrGWLMDMd0AD1yr Hg1V6z7Bh+lNXCH7PH8QXlMoz9i4QW16ZdGRNgOqQDxT8HY+dEV9kYs/CUl5NSSstiR9 HrBC57hHA3cqBkghWac8cOalxNHIqj1UEQdAuYbyS9YEbUv930lc2Xj2ZNKvZxwgHPgo RxCA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=3g6EqdYRB9EMfWnWkbcvzhMazVKin3Hj5SVNDlBrF8k=; b=Bau6VtoT0hftMmgSbes5wj+9zcBoNdVDeKpM0fa6Ykr7zsk2Lpi8zqQnQf3CmarG80 x+vi9x/vVijc7aFUjzOUhV5nQujyr4R/7lzundhOxDxWDZ8OvaBo5EyhNgPGbTBO6pQe tTQoy8EliMOvhN3nNfQb5patzxCJfZ4xQ/9q9WwAXmAAz9NPRsRDj8PQK0rnbgrQ0ozM 0+93JZH98v24mbI8tDir1ikU3UvdrgRcxzVlrknRcUKHlfDTO7tHY9KbjCcgFHPajFmI 51LHUzDIbcY6vsxItqcLUuaAEVJ61a0JfY/fvgUG8CjcZvHWXals1SGIiQ0xy0jcgyqq Nq1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQxnFzC7iFxz6IQOTdaGqIVuSfsgRUYywfAW7Dam9dkSWRVbfRrW9UAxwlc9V9ZsUEMhjuAA5o/AuG6XA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.139.166 with SMTP id qz6mr24201286pab.148.1454719967818; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 16:52:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.67.3.197 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 16:52:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.67.3.197 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 16:52:47 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 16:52:47 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: From: Raymond Malekian To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2016 00:52:48 -0000 Raymond1352 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Feb 6 05:46:38 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22DABA9F20E for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2016 05:46:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from niconjagi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yk0-x233.google.com (mail-yk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA9DA10C6 for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2016 05:46:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from niconjagi@gmail.com) Received: by mail-yk0-x233.google.com with SMTP id z13so68927250ykd.0 for ; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 21:46:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Xx1G69t72Rh3YVHMsCDb+lp3WFXv6tcviIiKnGvC0zk=; b=MRBdd2zrfGN0xeZIRUI3r1cIJXIyGq8eVxcrpR4KIyTn7uFktjY5bvHOcqqBrJxeip eYg1SBgUYuwE8yaKRLA/fhRN1LXG6GILOlvYDjklKL81pZT7CttkWyvb12nxMDyooB0M kqv3BFZoAM4qS9ARDAjC9+uJ9DoSmaiQgKQW5FXd9J94Zj/1+SNb/dfAF5+7OgVV2ltG /mq3ee/8qH1AQOprAQUWM8/c8TEMgcQz39eJx5qTAzze/C79QIoMCnF0QtoFZqDC7P1R fhOOXgwSNag29YZ7LJcTso2y/NKtTO08sVZT3NmgixdSwBk1IOT2tGu5qxyDYe0g30PF 0A8Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Xx1G69t72Rh3YVHMsCDb+lp3WFXv6tcviIiKnGvC0zk=; b=Lbn5oGsaPZ4cAKppX8PqMx8hbiHX79wj7clc6m1BOXghgid2A5kArvNSfh5O6IAC0K jbVRssFlTl3y7yZvY/VDWyNSQr32Imha7LVDDiAnxtXgc9ustkJ4heY8IPSlsGOYXNQR DPWRzA2JaB7Ts1YzhtvooUqFXULF/MTuEz0cvtPqqIJiHn8jlpRZ0ti9HpTCMwT6GRcF wpSfMRStedcSazcHXZYqZs1/S9fgmz+Rca57VgFcdDsXTlid+Y5CQz95RWmf1ZeyzLq1 X+P3lGrHqB4aIV6Glvpe/gKHqGfJhbnMKsxH/qT7/nHUMliKaR9hWTnfYoISC4WohkgU +wGg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQZns3P/H5KG9m9mcuqoT5Dlig69bFEiHIt/P7dZpd/0xmz0/9E8P70zBgBWn5j1W25AW9rchH1RmuVGQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.37.34.215 with SMTP id i206mr8682054ybi.175.1454737597043; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 21:46:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.25.8 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 21:46:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <71862CB3-F0C9-4981-9730-2C1054C3E572@schamschula.com> <9EE3E5E5-F717-4536-9EEB-C0CD07A190A8@schamschula.com> Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 21:46:36 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: mysql57 upgrade issue From: Nicodemus Njagi To: =?UTF-8?Q?Trond_Endrest=C3=B8l?= Cc: Marius Schamschula , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2016 05:46:38 -0000 hello ...please assist me to raise money for my education On 2/5/16, Trond Endrest=C3=B8l wrote= : > On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 07:42-0600, Marius Schamschula wrote: > >> Trond, >> >> Apparently there is something amiss here, I probably should open a >> ticket. >> >> portupgrade -fprv databases/mysql57-server databases/mysql57-client > > You can't run that as a single invocation. portupgrade would then > determine that upgrading the client should precede the upgrading of > the server, and you'll be back at square one. > >> also failed with the same error, just leaving mysql57-client uninstalled= . >> >> I ended up running the following: >> >> cd /usr/ports/databases/mysql57-server >> >> make deinstall >> make install >> >> This left me with a working mysql-client/server-5.7.10_2 >> >> On Feb 5, 2016, at 3:57 AM, Trond Endrest=C3=B8l >> wrote: >> >> > On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 19:26-0600, Marius Schamschula wrote: >> > >> >> While running portmaster I found this failure: >> >> >> >> =3D=3D=3D> Registering installation for mysql57-client-5.7.10_2 >> >> Installing mysql57-client-5.7.10_2... >> >> pkg-static: mysql57-client-5.7.10_2 conflicts with >> >> mysql57-server-5.7.10_1 (installs files into the same place). >> >> Problematic file: /usr/local/include/mysql/binary_log_types.h >> >> *** Error code 70 >> >> >> >> Stop. >> >> >> >> What to do? Manually, uninstall mysql57-server-5.7.10_1? >> > >> > I'm using portupgrade, and I had to update databases/mysql57-server >> > prior to databases/mysql57-client. >> > >> > Something along these lines: >> > >> > portupgrade -fprv databases/mysql57-server >> > portupgrade -fprv databases/mysql57-client > > -- > +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ > | Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, | > | Trond Endrest=C3=B8l, | Trond Endrest=C3=B8l, = | > | IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, | > | Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gj=C3=B8vik Technical College, Norway, = | > | tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, | > | sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. | > +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Feb 6 14:11:26 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46E02A9F095 for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2016 14:11:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x233.google.com (mail-wm0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5DF4B7F for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2016 14:11:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x233.google.com with SMTP id p63so62080344wmp.1 for ; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 06:11:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=m9qizr+CCMy44wKU2N/R7JcPwMXX+UFDXLc6Uyu6nOY=; b=NJMWjQqaKbC4Y21Bio19Vzq05LzRzV2EoIuZGsTi0Z7EsTi2PUzhE3LbJ+dWPczpB5 briZnDvQ76ZI/0x6wdDrMgv5D20A9eNGIf5ql8bZNzys2vaTIFQLIRe8goCZlO7onjMI II6WL10Vgjm193GtD1r78ZI6YIZbSCX8upibhzN1go/UDeAe56GK+TSMMS+fwQUANuDW wYf+yRncsrpyMlkNeuIbqO++iRvConTLA+ysZMEGVFc/PEOrVQrw++a2BFQ50qv8qXUd Dgj3iLQSL9LaPID6H88lalpLyz25fe7QXYWMFENPREkaESB0I2iIlmA8zKEtD9b1fFAU vy/A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=m9qizr+CCMy44wKU2N/R7JcPwMXX+UFDXLc6Uyu6nOY=; b=lwMu6VWHukPK1pcTzu9UlE/Y9jDaaA0pxyIuMWMX6ZOYYoDXGlxW8AYb0bBlGNX6NS VbKHt4eh2jhsVpwixYoGQm1awYP3PLed288kuhVnQp3diFqtzDI53Q+iH38U2RbuaYLJ VmTCRhKAqrHNit0n2ojP0xo/Zd25d2OdYF9MwFJjRAPezZ49K2TPtkPk8jLmIw0hsJsf L9NdOS8Lx6dch/U7RaJgZXwEZ9ZfqTeWzHRMiX+rUNuH8In51QQ63LcuiSK617nmmcjP wrNdRBUWbxItm+Bq0wLe1kzywy+Hs9fl7kOXfxMxtukJ3ZTbtpqViruV91nWB7VAJfZa 8VuA== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTr5gfU1MNMShF8S4mIcwafp0Trc7O91Qfb5qtycwiTx8a4wT00l4FAxXerQqFlcL5+IKmfboJTS6RzAw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.28.91.83 with SMTP id p80mr32850600wmb.48.1454767883387; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 06:11:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.28.31.77 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Feb 2016 06:11:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2016 14:11:23 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: UEFI resolution From: krad To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2016 14:11:26 -0000 Hi, I'm converting quite a few of my systems to uefi boot, and have run into an anoying problem. The monitor(s) in the data center is a really old and crappy and a few of them wont display the resolution that seems to be selected when I choose uefi boot. Is there any way to peg this back? Legacy boot works fine, but i'd rather not have the hassle of replacing loads of the monitors. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Feb 6 16:45:09 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ECF7AA0DC2 for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2016 16:45:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@mips.inka.de) Received: from mail.inka.de (quechua.inka.de [IPv6:2001:7c0:407:1001:217:a4ff:fe3b:e77c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE5A9DF3 for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2016 16:45:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@mips.inka.de) Received: from mips.inka.de (news@[127.0.0.1]) by mail.inka.de with uucp (rmailwrap 0.5) id 1aS5yr-0004VJ-Kk; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 17:45:05 +0100 Received: from lorvorc.mips.inka.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u16GfTha015953 for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2016 17:41:29 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from news@lorvorc.mips.inka.de) Received: (from news@localhost) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u16GfTir015952 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 6 Feb 2016 17:41:29 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from news) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Christian Weisgerber Newsgroups: list.freebsd.questions Subject: Re: Sendmail submission as client Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2016 16:41:29 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: User-Agent: slrn/1.0.2 (FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2016 16:45:09 -0000 On 2016-02-05, Alberto Mijares wrote: > However, when sending mail, the server relay.domain.tld says: > 530 5.5.1 Invalid command: Must issue an AUTH command first > So, Sendmail is not sending credentials, is not honoring authinfo feature. Sendmail as shipped with FreeBSD does not support SMTP AUTH. You need a version compiled with SASL support. I ran into the same problem, see http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?slrnmp0mna.rg3.naddy http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?slrnmp5pq1.2rfv.naddy -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Feb 6 20:52:03 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3BD3A9F1A9 for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2016 20:52:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amijaresp@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-x231.google.com (mail-yw0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85F34BCB for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2016 20:52:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amijaresp@gmail.com) Received: by mail-yw0-x231.google.com with SMTP id h129so77829374ywb.1 for ; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 12:52:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=D4wLH4PQIQQvnG013qyr0mPWxQhzpAzIOlJ/vgBXNs4=; b=LOuXHwIQiWxb4HsPMeTyFejN2F/j5jaIVTSGY1Vgbhhj5EBXVDg1Ovt4sZDvlqbk0x FHSm76X8cujJYoEVxByip9z2F3BHcXIxv4IOwNJmWIrLzuTN/CAktfSQM1/5NAz9G+l7 hQrx0B33RtsU6xhyPqvUvIPYwrpq89wNajrWS2Vn1zGcPd7ELub61ZnWCeeCHOGFov6e r8raUoNY7rvFbjKnEf01VQ6QZPKTZ6dyi+6mLM6i7sBOe3YWqyVz4Pfv7xNjgoP28UdV E1RSKPRmmuem6B6pqh9MFw0dx76Wx2D5irB1YBu+xzyfp20uhPiDPXztg/4bW7CdouN7 Vb0g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=D4wLH4PQIQQvnG013qyr0mPWxQhzpAzIOlJ/vgBXNs4=; b=H51xwz1dDpUOTtOqdsmRnApk9nh9RE5DtDCMDMedRb+56hD04mIeZU77uRh2L4c54X KSF6GXcp0fxo9ZeqhRK0OwkVKPiZxTyoclk72EIVlzR6vuDUWBCrScW+8/dDtpMxiLGx WCvzsbULjy35NwV6lGGa41uw0pMROZDSQpCQq15UrCjZjohucD7WUr09TY/MYnQWON53 q86VfeBzKLzLctW83MdXtBnFv/Xo+Vv2NDlVWMwCx+TQN/dpRn0w35WdO9xDDBOxgNl/ us8UvOujL/RfOZKgYjNK5Hq2jn102osar9WkOxvES8aTHlNwAy0kgdgm2YIIr70+ZwL7 AQrQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQbyf5jdxC2RJWu2V9NCtUj6nj4ZD9qV4iT0FH/MPn4+txoHaGA53wVen2Rx/MhR8TL9xL97Ud31R6qeA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.129.125.10 with SMTP id y10mr10147401ywc.331.1454791922778; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 12:52:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.129.74.4 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Feb 2016 12:52:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2016 16:22:02 -0430 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Sendmail submission as client From: Alberto Mijares To: Christian Weisgerber Cc: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2016 20:52:03 -0000 On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > On 2016-02-05, Alberto Mijares wrote: > >> However, when sending mail, the server relay.domain.tld says: >> 530 5.5.1 Invalid command: Must issue an AUTH command first >> So, Sendmail is not sending credentials, is not honoring authinfo feature. > > Sendmail as shipped with FreeBSD does not support SMTP AUTH. > You need a version compiled with SASL support. > > I ran into the same problem, see > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?slrnmp0mna.rg3.naddy > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?slrnmp5pq1.2rfv.naddy > Thank you very very much. Best regards, Alberto Mijares