Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 6 Feb 2012 03:30:10 GMT
From:      Alvin Poon <aspoon@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: ports/151521: pkg_upgrade (sysutils/bsdadminscripts) not working if /usr/ports not present
Message-ID:  <201202060330.q163UAWO048505@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/151521; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Alvin Poon <aspoon@gmail.com>
To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, subs@christiantena.net
Cc:  
Subject: Re: ports/151521: pkg_upgrade (sysutils/bsdadminscripts) not working
 if /usr/ports not present
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 11:01:29 +0800

 The problem resurfaces as 9-RELEASE is available:
 
 # pkg_upgrade -aC
 fetch: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9-release/INDEX:
 File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access)
 #
 
 It appears to be a problem with the name "packages-9-release", as the
 folder available on FTP is actually "packages-9.0-release".  (note the
 .0 in the version)  Once the system switches to stable releases such
 as "packages-9-stable" it should work fine. (as packages-9-stable is
 available on FTP)
 
 The problem is found in /usr/local/sbin/uma, line 76 onwards:
 
      71 # Logic from src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/add/main.c, plus the
 possibility to
      72 # override the architecture with ARCH.
      73 : ${PACKAGEROOT="ftp://ftp.freebsd.org"}
      74 : ${ARCH="$(uname -m)"}
      75 branch="$(uname -r | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]')"
      76 number="${branch%%.*}"
      77 branch="${branch##*-}"
      78 case "$branch" in
      79         release)
      80                 branch=$number-$branch
      81         ;;
      82         stable|current)
      83                 branch=${number%%.*}-$branch
      84         ;;
      85         *)
      86                 # Fallback to stable for prerelease and the like.
      87                 branch=${number%%.*}-stable
      88         ;;
      89 esac
 
 It arbitrarily removed the .x minor version from the number.  It
 should have been "number=${branch%%-*}", since the minor version is
 further stripped off in the following case statements depending on the
 release.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201202060330.q163UAWO048505>