From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 1 01:07:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93FCF16A400; Tue, 1 May 2007 01:07:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (nagual.pp.ru [194.87.13.69]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0228D13C447; Tue, 1 May 2007 01:07:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nagual.pp.ru (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l4117AIY001410; Tue, 1 May 2007 05:07:10 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l4117AKC001409; Tue, 1 May 2007 05:07:10 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 05:07:09 +0400 From: Andrey Chernov To: Roman Kurakin Message-ID: <20070501010709.GA1304@nagual.pp.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Chernov , Roman Kurakin , Alfred Perlstein , src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org References: <200704301516.l3UFGJbu019162@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070430180043.GK13868@elvis.mu.org> <20070430181824.GA83415@nagual.pp.ru> <20070430225717.GA7008@VARK.MIT.EDU> <20070501000242.GA19510@nagual.pp.ru> <20070501002817.GA887@nagual.pp.ru> <463690FE.9000209@inse.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <463690FE.9000209@inse.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, Alfred Perlstein , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/sysinstall main.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 01:07:12 -0000 On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 04:59:42AM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote: > Hi, > > Since there is some noise around this, could we just scream for a while > that code should be fixed but allow it to still work? After some time than > the majority of the buggy code will be fixed we will stick to the std > behavior? IMHO this will be less painful. Nice idea, but depends of amount of problem reports I'll got. If the number will be small, there is no pain to be std. After my last commit I not get any report yet (excepting unclear "some two ports", without names). BTW, screaming can be only for args checking. For putenv() right or wrong usage can't be detected inside lib. -- http://ache.pp.ru/