Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:50:53 -0700
From:      Evan Martin <evan@chromium.org>
To:        Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com>
Cc:        chromium@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Why Google street view scrolls not very smoothly in Chrome?
Message-ID:  <CAFzwtj2xP6Lz4xr0q4MKQ%2B61KToPbkU4iZ%2B5DkSNXgErq%2B9Vtg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <526F0B38.10204@rawbw.com>
References:  <5265ED2F.7030009@rawbw.com> <CAFzwtj1_C8tzm2MZr1kJjfig1wU_WmpTPtMELDWUuN-4R0L6LQ@mail.gmail.com> <526C3BEF.1020409@rawbw.com> <CAFzwtj23d2njWSXMF97b%2B-4dafJdNLBiC7uVgNQ%2B%2B8h6VOZZ6w@mail.gmail.com> <526F0B38.10204@rawbw.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com> wrote:

> On 10/28/2013 14:22, Evan Martin wrote:
>
>> Ah, you're using nspluginwrapper.  Unfortunately, nspluginwrapper just
>> doesn't work very well with Chrome.
>>
>> nspluginwrapper is actually unmaintained, and in working on Chrome for
>> Linux we ran into so many problems with it that one of the Chrome
>> developers took over maintainership in an attempt to fix some bugs!  But in
>> practice I don't think it'll ever work well.
>>
>> http://nspluginwrapper.org/ => last release was June 2011.
>>
>
> Ok, I agree. nspluginwrapper probably won't ever work well.
> But it works better in firefox for this same application.
> So maybe this isn't nspluginwraspper fault in this case.


If only you knew how many hours I spent chasing down
nspluginwrapper-related bugs while implementing Chrome's plugin support...
:)

But you are right, nspluginwrapper will likely always work better in
Firefox.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFzwtj2xP6Lz4xr0q4MKQ%2B61KToPbkU4iZ%2B5DkSNXgErq%2B9Vtg>