From owner-freebsd-advocacy Wed Apr 22 14:19:55 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA00746 for freebsd-advocacy-outgoing; Wed, 22 Apr 1998 14:19:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mailman.naxs.com (MAILMAN.naxs.com [206.31.102.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA00689 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 1998 21:19:32 GMT (envelope-from aiarbuckle@naxs.com) Received: from naxs.com ([206.31.122.183]) by mailman.naxs.com (Post.Office MTA v3.1.2 release (PO205-101c) ID# 0-42723U8000L3500S0) with ESMTP id AAA184; Wed, 22 Apr 1998 17:20:36 -0400 Message-ID: <353E5DF5.32197EF8@naxs.com> Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 17:15:33 -0400 From: "Andrew I. Arbuckle" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dwilde1@ibm.net CC: Woody Carey , Greg Lehey , dg@root.com, Mark Ovens , freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: An idea for promoting FreeBSD References: <353E3B82.2D7540FE@ibm.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Just a comment from an individual that is looking into an OS for a practical application - It appears from my research that FreeBSD would be ideal for any organization thinking of setting up an in-house Web Server, at least from the cost view, and even if you factor in the learning curve, it still looks very competitive. Perhaps you should address this is your demo idea. Don Wilde wrote: > > Woody Carey wrote: > > > > On Wed, 22 Apr 1998, Don Wilde wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > be workable. Remember, we're not worried about them being able to USE > > > BSD, we're only concerned with showing them how powerful it is. For > > > > [snip] > > > > I don't think I am understanding what you are suggesting here. IMHO > > we should be very concerned about people Using FBSD, not just knowing that > > it is powerful. What audience is this for? Surely a physicist would not > > be concerned with showing Joe User how powerful their linear particle > > accelerator is? Why try to make something complicated appear simple to > > lure people in? > > To use your example, we want to show Joe Congressman that it can do neat > things that he's willing to pay for. In the real world, this is Joe > Boss. Actually, [and my father worked at LANL for many years, he can > attest to this] lots of their time was spent making wow-gosh-gee-whiz > demos to impress Congress, DOD and media people. > > I'm not trying to imply that setup to do these things is simple, only > that it can do amazing things when set up. The reality is that many > users will fall away when they discover that it takes some thought to > understand [even if it still doesn't crash!], but some will stay, and it > doesn't take much of a percentage of a few hundred thousand disk-testers > to stick to add measurably to our user base. Some smaller percentage of > those will actually learn enough that they start to get the courage to > contribute code, as I'm now just starting to do myself after almost 3 > years of FreeBSD experience. The big point is that we will impress all > of those users who take the time to load the disk, and if they ever do > need a serious OS, they will consider FreeBSD in a positive light. > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message