Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 13:48:06 +0900 From: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> To: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, hrs@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/japanese/acroread Makefile pkg-plist Message-ID: <20050911134806.65920cba.nork@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <op.sww6vbcy9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> References: <200509110358.j8B3wkob098825@repoman.freebsd.org> <op.sww6vbcy9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 23:03:01 -0500 "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> wrote: > > Add a symlink of nppdf.so into X11BASE/lib/browser_plugins. > > Bump PORTREVISION. > I personal don't think it's good idea. browser-plugins is the place where > all native go in, not Linux binary. Linux binary can cause some troubles Really? Is there a policy that browser-plugins is the place where all native go in? So I think that linuxpluginwrapper should not be installed symlinks to Linux binaries. To support Linux binaries with linuxpluginwrapper, browsers should be used X11BASE/lib/browser_linux_plugins? > for the other browsers and apps. How troubles? Apps cannot dynamic-link to Linux binaries without linuxpluginwrapper.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050911134806.65920cba.nork>