Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:30:43 -0500 From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> To: "Mikhail T." <mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.org>, office@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice? Message-ID: <5123FD13.8030508@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <5123DAF9.50400@aldan.algebra.com> References: <511CED39.2010909@aldan.algebra.com> <CADLo83-a7yqkFhgMinGiookjvgtFuTVeGQobOepuHDCeH_wsog@mail.gmail.com> <51238AE9.20205@aldan.algebra.com> <CADLo83-FoLrZGgkDZjjQ-jb-fcZNS3isn-F=zbd9pVkkmXQZUQ@mail.gmail.com> <5123ADEC.2040103@aldan.algebra.com> <CAJ-Vmok2HFaU4QQHBEaO0iL3HE4pLpA=iFa-xfqQtOk9JewioQ@mail.gmail.com> <5123CF37.7000506@FreeBSD.org> <5123D2F6.5040909@aldan.algebra.com> <5123D65D.2030301@FreeBSD.org> <5123DAF9.50400@aldan.algebra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-02-19 15:05:13 -0500, Mikhail T. wrote: > On 19.02.2013 14:45, Jung-uk Kim wrote: >> Actually, I tried very hard to build sane LO with gcc 4.2 but it >> wasn't fruitful. Eventually, I gave up on adding kludges after >> kludges because LO is moving away from pre-C++11 compilers >> anyway. :-( > Should not a pre-C++11 compiler simply /fail/ upon encountering > C++11 code? configure script detects the C++ compiler and sets various compiler flags. It basically tries to work around *known* issues as much as possible. However, it does not cover every possible combination. "Moving away" means "not actively tested". >>> And if there is a *good* reason to reject the base compiler, >>> I'd expect such good reason to be documented -- preferably >>> with bug-reports filed against either the FreeBSD and its >>> toolchain or against the LibreOffice code. Or both... >> I believe there were plenty PRs already. > I can not find any :-( The ones against FreeBSD > <http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=&severity=&priority=&class=&state=&sort=none&text=libreoffice&responsible=&multitext=&originator=&release=>; > > all talk about build failures (except the 176269 > <http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/176269>, filed > today). There are no relevant bug-reports against LibreOffice, that > mention "gcc-4.2.1" > <https://bugassistant.libreoffice.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=gcc-4.2.1>; > > or "gcc 4.2.1 > <https://bugassistant.libreoffice.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=gcc%204.2.1>". Okay, > sorry. I really love to build LO with GCC 4.2, too. I really do. However, I don't see much point of mentioning that fact in PR. Jung-uk Kim -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRI/0TAAoJECXpabHZMqHOsy0IANi1KZSRdqARfxJ65r1MLi4a tQkCq7LmyMNA81ND1GKAatg52UDLF2GN5o9Yw71l/XiYN2JV667aGVaF9e96a789 ONnXRWaGw2DohTH8SpGu81Vstj5Vn/iots4b0bFdhz3HCW6lTgUsqlD/+n3dVVpo c4MlUAFtEhpqejvsX7g10kPqn8IZwZc7pBUfoeSw1sMIChajxmlfXDlHkvtKwVJu jHbu2PDMwty2kgJ1kRdYNt5yZXl9chSuSxqy23O5odfHyLWV6+SGk+SOb32MSp7H /oJ0UdFLFzqwGSqlK7bDOMIyL0yLaPz5WJd8X+HC/BmR5FUugdILe8lHOeJ/rq0= =ZyWD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5123FD13.8030508>