From owner-freebsd-questions  Wed Apr 26 22:00:28 1995
Return-Path: questions-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id WAA16766
          for questions-outgoing; Wed, 26 Apr 1995 22:00:28 -0700
Received: from trout.sri.MT.net (trout.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.12])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id WAA16760
          for <questions@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 26 Apr 1995 22:00:24 -0700
Received: (from nate@localhost) by trout.sri.MT.net (8.6.11/8.6.11) id TAA19621; Wed, 26 Apr 1995 19:23:25 -0600
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 1995 19:23:25 -0600
From: Nate Williams <nate@trout.sri.MT.net>
Message-Id: <199504270123.TAA19621@trout.sri.MT.net>
To: Don Dunbar <ddunbar@ipxpress.aws.waii.com>
Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: linux
In-Reply-To: <199504270040.AA02827@ipxpress.aws.waii.com>
References: <199504270040.AA02827@ipxpress.aws.waii.com>
Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> My dad's office telles him that FreeBSD is not AT&T UNIX compatible and it
> can't run SunOS 4.1.3 binaries like Linux can.

*laugh* 

1) SunOS is as far from AT&T Unix in any commercial OS as you can get.
2) Linux can't run SunOS binaries.

FreeBSD is as much compatible with AT&T Unix as Linux is.


Nate