Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 00:30:56 +0800 From: "Xin LI" <delphij@gmail.com> To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=" <des@des.no> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Michael Bushkov <bushman@rsu.ru> Subject: Re: [HEADS UP]: OpenLDAP+nss_ldap+nss_modules separated patch and more (SoC) Message-ID: <a78074950608220930g539fdfeeq88ce3d20053e44e6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <86hd0423zk.fsf@xps.des.no> References: <44E9582C.2010400@rsu.ru> <44EAA213.6010507@delphij.net> <002901c6c5ba$628b67d0$9800a8c0@carrera> <86hd0423zk.fsf@xps.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8/22/06, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav <des@des.no> wrote:
> "Michael Bushkov" <bushman@rsu.ru> writes:
> > Li Xin wrote:
> > > Would you please consider having the imported OpenLDAP to install
> > > shared objects under alternative names? It might be painful for
> > > users who wants OpenLDAP installation from the ports collection
> > > (as OpenLDAP team moves fast and fixes bug from time to time) if
> > > they get a same library in /usr/lib...
> > I've been thinking about that. Would names like "libldap_i.so" and
> > "liblber_i.so" be ok ("_i" means "imported", or "internal")?
>
> Please don't. If somebody isn't happy with the base system's libldap,
> they can add WITHOUT_LDAP to their make.conf.
Fair to me. I think this is a better solution for the issue.
Cheers,
--=20
Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net> http://www.delphij.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a78074950608220930g539fdfeeq88ce3d20053e44e6>