Date: Sun, 10 Aug 1997 17:01:38 +0200 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD hackers) Subject: Re: /usr/dos for doscmd Message-ID: <19970810170138.SM15800@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970810175807.412O-100000@trifork.gu.net>; from Andrew Stesin on Aug 10, 1997 17:59:09 %2B0300 References: <199708101438.QAA12699@ocean.campus.luth.se> <Pine.BSF.3.96.970810175807.412O-100000@trifork.gu.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Andrew Stesin wrote: > > It might be nice to have a directory where doscmd can play around, > > and where you can also place stuff related to it (like maybe > > default config file?). Wouldn't /compat/dos work? Or > > /usr/local/lib/dos or something? > /usr/local/dos -- I vote for it.:) Errm, Mikael resent this to the list what he sent me privately... No, /usr/local is already reserved for the ports system. /compat perhaps not. I still vote for /usr/libdata/dos/. > > About relying on X11 being installed... Can't that be made checked > > at runtime? By using dlopen() instead of normal dependency, or > > so? > Nice idea. Did'ya ever try? I think that's gonna be hard if many symbols are being used. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970810170138.SM15800>