From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 24 10:02:27 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA7DD8D for ; Fri, 24 May 2013 10:02:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petefrench@ingresso.co.uk) Received: from constantine.ingresso.co.uk (constantine.ingresso.co.uk [IPv6:2a02:b90:3002:e550::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC461000 for ; Fri, 24 May 2013 10:02:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ingresso.co.uk; s=x; h=Date:From:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:Subject:To; bh=TF2Mylcbpu+wgA/npobGZ2Qea5GhTnG+YAhv4Oxb1fA=; b=3bVuE10asA9DTd+AND1wVPtuhPBmzqgpbgv5iDP7E4ZyQetZlhLY9RI4wEmIta5y7KU8fI/iSWJIliDULB+Kgx7xyQVCexdIyOmjqpr1I5cr4z57MT/kn3DHILKcs+T0QEvT7HTGPxdFufLO8snK3KHGnj6erXXBGNdEKlPeZ1U=; Received: from dilbert.london-internal.ingresso.co.uk ([10.64.50.6] helo=dilbert.ingresso.co.uk) by constantine.ingresso.co.uk with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1UfopN-000DUq-2c; Fri, 24 May 2013 11:02:25 +0100 Received: from petefrench by dilbert.ingresso.co.uk with local (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1UfopM-0002S8-V2; Fri, 24 May 2013 11:02:24 +0100 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, marck@rinet.ru Subject: Re: Proposed MFC to hastctl: compact 'status' and introduce 'list' command In-Reply-To: Message-Id: From: Pete French Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 11:02:24 +0100 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:02:27 -0000 > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/248291 ... > The reason I'm asking is that it could lead to changes in hast-related scripts > which one use in production. Any chance we could do this is 2 stages - first being to add 'list' to give us a chnace ti change scripts over, then make the chnages to 'status'. I have scripts which try and parse the outut from 'status' which will need changing, and I sspect I am not the only one... cheers, -pete.