Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 6 Apr 2002 12:55:06 -0500
From:      "Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org>
To:        ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: latest INDEX count versus cvs
Message-ID:  <20020406175531.E52AE3F28@bast.unixathome.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5 Apr 2002 at 23:09, ports@freebsd.org wrote:

> A new INDEX was just committed with 6777 ports.
> 
> I've just finished a reconciliation between cvs, INDEX, and FreshPorts.   
> Here are my findings:
> 
> The following ports are being pulled out of a cvsup, but are not appearing 
> in INDEX.  Does anyone have a reason why they should not be added to their 
> respective catetgory Makefiles?

With recent commits by ijliao (thank you), that leaves the following:

> devel/arm-elf-gcc31
> japanese/alias-fonts 
> textproc/tclxml

-- 
Dan Langille
The FreeBSD Diary - http://freebsddiary.org/ - practical examples


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020406175531.E52AE3F28>