From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 5 6: 8:41 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from veldy.net (w028.z064001117.msp-mn.dsl.cnc.net [64.1.117.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9852837B71C for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2001 06:08:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from veldy@veldy.net) Received: from HP2500B (fuggle.veldy.net [64.1.117.28]) by veldy.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 1790DBA3B; Mon, 5 Mar 2001 08:07:53 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <003b01c0a57d$73254010$3028680a@tgt.com> From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" To: "Dima Dorfman" Cc: References: <20010305025935.2A2A83E09@bazooka.unixfreak.org> Subject: Re: OpenSSH Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 08:06:17 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Not likely, considering it isn't even in -current yet. There are some > alleged problems with it, especially when interacting with ssh.com > implementations. I say alleged because while I've seen many > complaints about this on the development list, I've never actually > seen them myself. I have used 2.5.0pl1 with SSH2 client from ssh.com and with the SSH1 client in TeraTerm Pro. No problems at all. > > Regardless of the last part of the above, however, there's almost no > chance you'll see it in 4.3-RELEASE. Such things need time to settle > in -current before they're merged. I have to agree that it should settle a bit --- just to make sure stable is indeed stable. There has been enough chaos lately. > > Dima Dorfman > dima@unixfreak.org > Tom Veldhouse veldy@veldy.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message