Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 21:17:20 -0700 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <allbery@ece.cmu.edu> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.3-BETA5 Available Message-ID: <20040920041720.GA9460@odin.ac.hmc.edu> In-Reply-To: <1095653440.24031.23.camel@rushlight.kf8nh.com> References: <20040920022927.GA70726@bobbi.cse.buffalo.edu> <1095653440.24031.23.camel@rushlight.kf8nh.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 12:10:40AM -0400, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote: > On Sun, 2004-09-19 at 22:29, Ken Smith wrote: > > still being worked on at this time. BIND9 is being imported and will > > be part of the 5.3 release. We will add at least one more beta (BETA6) >=20 > Is it just me, or is toward the end of the beta cycle just the *wrong* > time to switch from bind8 to bind9? Or am I misunderstanding this > statement? It is later then we would like, but we don't feel that BIND8 is viable for shipping in 5.3 because then we'd be stuck with it until 6. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBTlnPXY6L6fI4GtQRAkkOAKCZDJv8Sv9NwLD3YBQZAJpaXPx5bQCfYoTr HpKCZICxys37aGSD2T8EBXk= =fL4+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040920041720.GA9460>