From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 20 04:15:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5CEB16A4CE for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 04:15:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A88243D2D for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 04:15:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i8K4HKMJ009742; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 21:17:20 -0700 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0/Submit) id i8K4HKXf009741; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 21:17:20 -0700 Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 21:17:20 -0700 From: Brooks Davis To: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" Message-ID: <20040920041720.GA9460@odin.ac.hmc.edu> References: <20040920022927.GA70726@bobbi.cse.buffalo.edu> <1095653440.24031.23.camel@rushlight.kf8nh.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1095653440.24031.23.camel@rushlight.kf8nh.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on odin.ac.hmc.edu cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.3-BETA5 Available X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 04:15:34 -0000 --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 12:10:40AM -0400, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote: > On Sun, 2004-09-19 at 22:29, Ken Smith wrote: > > still being worked on at this time. BIND9 is being imported and will > > be part of the 5.3 release. We will add at least one more beta (BETA6) >=20 > Is it just me, or is toward the end of the beta cycle just the *wrong* > time to switch from bind8 to bind9? Or am I misunderstanding this > statement? It is later then we would like, but we don't feel that BIND8 is viable for shipping in 5.3 because then we'd be stuck with it until 6. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBTlnPXY6L6fI4GtQRAkkOAKCZDJv8Sv9NwLD3YBQZAJpaXPx5bQCfYoTr HpKCZICxys37aGSD2T8EBXk= =fL4+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi--