From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 11 10:05:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DB0C16A4F0 for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 10:05:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pigskin_referee@yahoo.com) Received: from web34406.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web34406.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.163.178.155]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7560A43D9D for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 10:05:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pigskin_referee@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 95472 invoked by uid 60001); 11 Sep 2006 10:04:58 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=4xTtt3MBRl3K0cleA72/AGk6hoIuOCxvK0rDm0zmp9Xze7BJxib5g8OrJLW/Hudy/OypmwuTV8mMRQrTYWPwpAgRb6x8TEyv18wRw2XgGtV8QDY+0RhGJFt1yeZUTUYdVFWXYuJw2DW5tLk1Jl3qhx8ANVjPft2TBYLU5da9Hsc= ; Message-ID: <20060911100458.95470.qmail@web34406.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [67.189.184.224] by web34406.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 03:04:58 PDT Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 03:04:58 -0700 (PDT) From: White Hat To: FreeBSD Users Questions In-Reply-To: <45052CC2.1040509@dial.pipex.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Making startup order static X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 10:05:54 -0000 --- Alex Zbyslaw wrote: [...] > I believe 6.1 uses rcorder for scripts from > /usr/local/etc/rc.d, in > which case you might be able to create local patches > in the relevant > ports which added appropriate e.g. > > # BEFORE: > # PROVIDES: > # REQUIRE: > > lines to force the order you want. This assumes > that they do not use > .sh suffixed scripts and that you use cvsup rather > than portsnap, which > I believe would trash your local patches. I do employ portsnap, so that would probably not be a viable solution. I am presently looking into implementing one that was suggested by a recent poster. I would have thought that there would have existed a simpler method to control on a permanent basis the loading of programs. I guess not. -- White Hat pigskin_referee@yahoo.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com