Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 09:09:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Christopher Sedore <cmsedore@mailbox.syr.edu> To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: aio and sockets (long) Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.95.990426090721.6385B-100000@rodan.syr.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.95.990426080745.21215A-100000@rodan.syr.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 26 Apr 1999, Christopher Sedore wrote: > > This could also present a solution for the pid vs struct proc * problem in > the "flock + kernel threads bug" series. Select operations could be > queued as async requests on the socket--they would then get killed by > aio_proc_rundown (with proper glue). Same actually goes for all the > wakeup functions. Just a thought. But only for sockets, of course. Not to helpful unless its implemented for other descriptor types. Someday I'll get my brain engaged before my fingers. -Chris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SOL.3.95.990426090721.6385B-100000>