From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 31 20:30:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E5F0106568C for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:30:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@telenix.org) Received: from mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 177078FC14 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:30:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@telenix.org) Received: (qmail 18698 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2009 20:30:45 -0000 Received: from april.chuckr.org (HELO april.telenix.org) (chuckr@[66.92.151.30]) (envelope-sender ) by mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 31 Mar 2009 20:30:45 -0000 Message-ID: <49D27D8B.2070607@telenix.org> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:31:07 -0400 From: Chuck Robey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090121) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: michael References: <20090331025726.GA10888@thought.org> <20090331112122.ae329221.freebsd@edvax.de> <49D202F0.9010104@utoronto.ca> <20090331140845.a1ece3c0.freebsd@edvax.de> <49D24EC8.7030507@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <49D24EC8.7030507@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 OpenPGP: id=F3DCA0E9; url=http://pgp.mit.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Wojciech Puchar , freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why?? (prog question) X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:30:47 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 michael wrote: Moved to FreeBSD-chat, all opinions really belong there. > > > Wojciech Puchar wrote: >>>> Tabbing is the worst form of indentation. It is *much* better to use >>>> spaces consistently. The only real sin is not sticking to one style per project. All else is just folks being stubborn, and there is too much of that already in software, that "my opinion is the only acceptable one" snobbery. Watch now while 10 different folks jump up to start pounding their personal drums ... >>> >> >> stupid discussion and off topic. everybody write code as he/she like, >> or as a team decided if it's not single person work. >> >> only end result matters. > you know real programmers code everything on one line. > sub > f{@s[$x,$y]=@s[($y+=$s[$x])%=@s,$x];$s[$x++]+$s[$y]-@s}@k=pop=~/../g;f$y+=hex$k[$x%@k]for@s=0..255;$x=1;$y=0;$/=\1;print$_^chr$s[f$x%=@s]for<> Now that one, I like! Reminds me of that hoary old "Obfuscated C" competition. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAknSfYsACgkQz62J6PPcoOmhyACfYMAzxOZcmDnfCGr8Xs5QJGYW 85QAoKAz0hH/cPVaqNVNjX75sSfFaPk4 =pdMX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----