Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 26 May 2008 10:04:13 +0100
From:      Doug Rabson <dfr@rabson.org>
To:        Bruce M. Simpson <bms@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/etc/mtree BSD.include.dist BSD.usr.dist src/include Makefile src/lib Makefile src/lib/libatm Makefile atm_addr.c cache_key.c ioctl_subr.c ip_addr.c ip_checksum.c libatm.h timer.c src/rescue/rescue Makefile src/sbin/atm Makefile ...
Message-ID:  <3C07B635-67F6-4EAD-A10F-D5AA4365FFEF@rabson.org>
In-Reply-To: <4839F77C.60306@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <200805252211.m4PMBgEU052231@repoman.freebsd.org> <4839E7A8.5050205@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.LSU.1.10.0805260018250.20676@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk> <4839F77C.60306@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 26 May 2008, at 00:34, Bruce M. Simpson wrote:

> Tony Finch wrote:
>> On Sun, 25 May 2008, Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
>>
>>> ATM shows no signs of going away as a WAN access technology for  
>>> people in the
>>> UK, although its use in the core outside of British Telecom is  
>>> being eroded by
>>> newer technologies.
>>>
>>
>> Doesn't BT's 21cn mean the death of ATM there too?
>>
>
> The G.998.1 part of ADSL2+ still mandates ATM as the transport.  
> Given how BT tend to roll things it out I would speculate that they  
> are still using ATM after 21CN migration, although I have no data to  
> confirm this either way.
>
> PPPoA is not going away any time soon -- it's written into the ITU  
> specs for G.DMT-lite after all -- and there is a huge installed user  
> base for that technology.
>
> Whatever happens with 21CN is still going to take time to filter  
> down to the rest of the populace. Also, someone's going to have to  
> pay for it somehow.
>
> Of course the whole ruckus over ATM in ADSL with people in the first  
> place, was that it locked them into using vendor gear, effectively  
> denying people control over their own IP endpoint address, and  
> restricting the services they can use as a result.

I recently was able to reclaim my IP endpoint address(es) using a  
cheap Netgear DM111P in PPPoE to PPPoA bridge mode. Works very nicely...




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C07B635-67F6-4EAD-A10F-D5AA4365FFEF>