Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 02 Jan 1996 23:02:46 -0600
From:      Jon Loeliger <jdl@jdl.com>
To:        "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Cc:        obrien@cs.ucdavis.edu (David E. O'Brien), freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD Hacker's list)
Subject:   Re: X for install 
Message-ID:  <199601030503.XAA02277@chrome.jdl.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 02 Jan 1996 17:42:54 PST." <1164.820633374@time.cdrom.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Apparently, "Jordan K. Hubbard" scribbled:
> It found
> my NIC and popped a configuration screen for it in my face, then it
> found my NCR and the CDROM attached, finished its basic installation
> then detected my Matrox and offered me a screen setup dialog.  System
> [...]
> That's how it *should* work, and as far as I can see, much of the
> "magic" comes from a little utility named `NTDETECT' - It apparently
> figures out who's where and reports this information back to higher
> level code which can say "Aha!  A Forchknacker EMT5023 NIC!

> I've often stated my willingness to do the "GUI" grot that would be
> required to make all those nifty auto-configuration screens come up,
> but the `NTDETECT' side of things is not really in my area of
> expertise.  Knowing how to stomp around in the PC memory & I/O address
> spaces and deal (hopefully) robustly with errors and cards going wiggy
> when probed is a black art.  Any black magicians out there interested
> in starting a `FreeBSD Detect 1.0' project? :-)

This sounds to me like the same general goal as the separation of
the hardware detection process during boot -- part of the detect,
semi-probe, negotiate, allocate, attach process that we've often
discussed.  Can the same core be used for both the normal UNIX boot
process and for the initial system config/install process?  Or am
I totally in the weeds here?

jdl



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199601030503.XAA02277>