Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:25:54 +0100
From:      "Bruce M. Simpson" <bms@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, Kevin Oberman <oberman@es.net>
Subject:   Re: multiple routing tables review patch ready for simple testing.
Message-ID:  <48178452.4050700@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4817743B.6090107@elischer.org>
References:  <20080429185100.57C2445010@ptavv.es.net> <4817743B.6090107@elischer.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian Elischer wrote:
>>
>> A general purpose OS is a different beast as it has no physical
>> equivalent of the FIB. It may have multiple routing tables, though, to
>> I think setrib would be a term less likely to cause confusion then
>> setfib even though, in the case of your FreeBSD patches, it's really
>> both.
> If we need to change the terminology now is the time..
> I asked for comments on terminology before and this is what we
> came up with.. but once it gets committed.... it gets set in stone.

The kernel forwarding table is not a RIB.

In the past some apps have tried to use it as one. They really shouldn't 
do that.

There are implementation constraints on the inter-process communication 
involved (PRC_ATOMIC, etc) which make it inherently unsuitable as a 
place for routing daemons to exchange routes, particularly when the 
system is under load, or running near load limits, as would be the case 
with a tightly engineered embedded system.

I understand folk went down that road in the past, as a means to get 
something up and running quickly as a working demo, or as a hangover 
from the days when they were the only tools around, but it isn't the way 
to build a comms infrastructure.

These days general purpose OSes are getting closer to specialised comms 
equipment in terms of what they can do, but more importantly, so are 
people's expectations of them -- and thus people's concern about whether 
or not it works tends to follow.

cheers
BMS



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48178452.4050700>