Date: Tue, 02 Jun 1998 16:07:56 -0700 From: David Greenman <dg@root.com> To: dyson@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: mike@dingo.cdrom.com (Mike Smith), mike@smith.net.au, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kernfs/procfs questions... Message-ID: <199806022307.QAA18235@implode.root.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 02 Jun 1998 11:50:32 CDT." <199806021650.LAA02867@dyson.iquest.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Mike Smith said: >> >> Sure; but can't these sort of improvements be made to the methods for >> manipulating procfs nodes? What other drawbacks are there to the FS >> model? >> >It is bogus that writing to a file "controls" something inside >the system, that is kind-of what SNMP is for. Now, if someone >wants a kernfs that is compatible with our sysctl, they should >be able to use the sysctl info to build the kernfs. I can see it now: sysctlfs :-) -DG David Greenman Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199806022307.QAA18235>