From owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 11:06:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 434CD10656A4 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:06:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3054E8FC19 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:06:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nAUB6oDW043381 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:06:50 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nAUB6nT1043379 for freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:06:49 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:06:49 GMT Message-Id: <200911301106.nAUB6nT1043379@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:06:50 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o misc/136889 embedded [nanobsd] [path] nanobsd error reporting and other ref o misc/135588 embedded [nanobsd] simple patch for adding amd64 support o misc/52256 embedded [picobsd] picobsd build script does not read in user/s o kern/42728 embedded [picobsd] many problems in src/usr.sbin/ppp/* after c 4 problems total. From owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 1 18:29:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607C41065692 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 18:29:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sr@jsreedinc.com) Received: from p01c11o142.mxlogic.net (p01c11o142.mxlogic.net [208.65.144.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 038A28FC14 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 18:29:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from unknown [74.218.64.198] (EHLO p01c11o142.mxlogic.net) by p01c11o142.mxlogic.net(mxl_mta-6.4.0-2) with ESMTP id d90651b4.ad94eb90.36529.00-411.88469.p01c11o142.mxlogic.net (envelope-from ); Tue, 01 Dec 2009 11:29:49 -0700 (MST) X-MXL-Hash: 4b15609d183e8e9d-1060068f418b0309fcf9a0f5ea2a0ca5bd9196f1 Received: from unknown [74.218.64.198] (EHLO mail.meadeconstructioninc.com) by p01c11o142.mxlogic.net(mxl_mta-6.4.0-2) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id 05d551b4.0.34026.00-003.81973.p01c11o142.mxlogic.net (envelope-from ); Tue, 01 Dec 2009 11:15:44 -0700 (MST) X-MXL-Hash: 4b155d50527baae9-4b5b1997542df2a6f6de2aa998e135bbf1917138 Received: from fredoffice.meadeconstructioninc.com ([192.168.165.10]) by mail.meadeconstructioninc.com for freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:15:43 -0500 Received: from jsroffice (unknown [192.168.166.194]) by fredoffice.meadeconstructioninc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 438142869E for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:15:43 -0500 (EST) From: "Shelby Reed" To: Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:15:44 -0500 Message-ID: <000001ca72b2$4ccda090$e668e1b0$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcpyskwKAynUiUTtQiWkZiey+ep6Pw== Content-Language: en-us X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2009113001)] X-MAIL-FROM: X-SOURCE-IP: [74.218.64.198] X-AnalysisOut: [v=1.0 c=1 a=33v89/HlF4MtXC6YL5XSUA==:17 a=KKUrqanXAAAA:8 a] X-AnalysisOut: [=uPnR3yLBAAAA:8 a=oqOPg16csEiNuXArXbAA:9 a=OQwi3JG-CisrGOw] X-AnalysisOut: [-nJhKHodLOc4A:4 a=ic4R-PIBbooA:10 a=9fk7AsBPyXwA:10 a=44Bl] X-AnalysisOut: [AfTXyFkA:10 a=F6i_kWxtmloA:10 a=gA6IeH5FQcgA:10 a=NWVoK91C] X-AnalysisOut: [QyQA:10 a=yMhMjlubAAAA:8 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=4UVUqY_6uZpugf] X-AnalysisOut: [60KV4A:9 a=CjGi3-M7j5TiC-y96lIA:7 a=JRD6nb2XL9ydpEsT9n0kdi] X-AnalysisOut: [4rL1cA:4] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Atmel AT91SAM9G20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:29:49 -0000 Hello, =20 Does anybody have a kernel config or some hints for the Atmel = AT91SAM9G20 ?=20 =20 I see work was done a few years ago on a very similar SoC here: = http://bsdimp.blogspot.com/2007/03/followup-atmel-at91-family-work.html =20 Working on getting FreeBSD running on this: = http://www.glomationinc.com/product_9G20i.html =20 Shelby =20 =20 From owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 3 19:06:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD55D106566C; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 19:06:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from google@vink.pl) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 456428FC1B; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 19:06:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e21so810844fga.13 for ; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 11:06:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.87.73.33 with SMTP id a33mr1727394fgl.26.1259865347152; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:35:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-fx0-f218.google.com (mail-fx0-f218.google.com [209.85.220.218]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e11sm8305411fga.4.2009.12.03.10.35.45 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:35:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by fxm10 with SMTP id 10so1691965fxm.34 for ; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:35:44 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.5.90 with SMTP id 26mr302838fau.59.1259865343789; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:35:43 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 19:35:43 +0100 Message-ID: <2ae8edf30912031035j14443854y6551bb7b125d8550@mail.gmail.com> From: Wiktor Niesiobedzki To: freebsd-embedded , freebsd-amd64 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Subject: 64-bit support on VIA C7 - on FreeBSD 8.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 19:06:20 -0000 Hi, I'm owner of a new VIA SN10000 mini-ITX mainboard which comes together with VIA C7 processor. During boot it is detected as: CPU: VIA Esther processor 1000MHz (997.51-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "CentaurHauls" Id = 0x6a9 Stepping = 9 Features=0xa7c9baff Features2=0x181 VIA Padlock Features=0x3fcc As far as I understand, this processor should support 64-bit mode and I should be able to boot amd64 FreeBSD. Playing with memstick image for amd64 I get: "CPU doesn't support long mode" As far as I've checked, I'm missing AMDID_LM flag, as the expression from bootinfo64.c: /* Check for long mode. */ do_cpuid(0x80000001, regs); return (regs[3] & AMDID_LM); Returns 0, as regs[3] is 0. As far as I've checked the mailing lists, there was an issue with missing support for CentaurHauls vendor, but this is not the case, as the failing check is later in the code. Do anyone has any experience with this family of processors? Are they different brands (supporting 64-bit mode and not)? I tried to look for some magic settings in BIOS, but none of it looked, like it could change anything here. Any hints? Cheers, Wiktor Niesiobedzki From owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 3 20:16:52 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Received: from [127.0.0.1] (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE0C21065670; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 20:16:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) From: Jung-uk Kim To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 15:16:43 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <2ae8edf30912031035j14443854y6551bb7b125d8550@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2ae8edf30912031035j14443854y6551bb7b125d8550@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200912031516.45316.jkim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-embedded Subject: Re: 64-bit support on VIA C7 - on FreeBSD 8.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 20:16:53 -0000 On Thursday 03 December 2009 01:35 pm, Wiktor Niesiobedzki wrote: > Hi, > > I'm owner of a new VIA SN10000 mini-ITX mainboard which comes > together with VIA C7 processor. During boot it is detected as: > CPU: VIA Esther processor 1000MHz (997.51-MHz 686-class CPU) > Origin = "CentaurHauls" Id = 0x6a9 Stepping = 9 > > Features=0xa7c9baffE,CMOV,PAT,CLFLUSH,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,TM,PBE> > Features2=0x181 > VIA Padlock Features=0x3fcc > > As far as I understand, this processor should support 64-bit mode > and I should be able to boot amd64 FreeBSD. No, C7 does not support long mode. New Nano family does. Jung-uk Kim From owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 3 21:00:52 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D51B11065676; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 21:00:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrej@antiszoc.hu) Received: from mail.deployis.eu (mail.deployis.eu [217.20.135.253]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E0968FC23; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 21:00:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37146 helo=mail.deployis.eu) by mail.deployis.eu with esmtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Debian)) id 1NGI50-0005ZR-9J from ; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 21:15:12 +0100 Received: from 188.157.90.138 (SquirrelMail authenticated user andrej@antiszoc.hu) by mail.deployis.eu with HTTP; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 21:15:10 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43003.188.157.90.138.1259871310.squirrel@mail.deployis.eu> In-Reply-To: <2ae8edf30912031035j14443854y6551bb7b125d8550@mail.gmail.com> References: <2ae8edf30912031035j14443854y6551bb7b125d8550@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 21:15:10 +0100 (CET) From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?G=F3t_Andr=E1s?= To: "Wiktor Niesiobedzki" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.2 [SVN] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score-deployiseu: -40 Cc: freebsd-embedded , freebsd-amd64 Subject: Re: 64-bit support on VIA C7 - on FreeBSD 8.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 21:00:52 -0000 Hi, Where do you exactly see that this cpu supports amd64? Why do you need it on an embedded platform? Regards, Andras On Csü, December 3, 2009 7:35 pm, Wiktor Niesiobedzki wrote: > Hi, > > > I'm owner of a new VIA SN10000 mini-ITX mainboard which comes together > with VIA C7 processor. During boot it is detected as: CPU: VIA Esther > processor 1000MHz (997.51-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "CentaurHauls" Id = > 0x6a9 Stepping = 9 > Features=0xa7c9baff PAT,CLFLUSH,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,TM,PBE> > Features2=0x181 > VIA Padlock Features=0x3fcc > > > As far as I understand, this processor should support 64-bit mode and > I should be able to boot amd64 FreeBSD. > > > Playing with memstick image for amd64 I get: > "CPU doesn't support long mode" > > > As far as I've checked, I'm missing AMDID_LM flag, as the expression > from bootinfo64.c: /* Check for long mode. */ > do_cpuid(0x80000001, regs); return (regs[3] & AMDID_LM); > > Returns 0, as regs[3] is 0. > > > As far as I've checked the mailing lists, there was an issue with > missing support for CentaurHauls vendor, but this is not the case, as the > failing check is later in the code. > > Do anyone has any experience with this family of processors? Are they > different brands (supporting 64-bit mode and not)? I tried to look for some > magic settings in BIOS, but none of it looked, like it could change > anything here. > > Any hints? > > > > Cheers, > > > Wiktor Niesiobedzki > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 3 22:22:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9BF1106566C; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 22:22:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from google@vink.pl) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA5238FC0C; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 22:22:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e21so216749fga.13 for ; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:22:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.103.205.13 with SMTP id h13mr734160muq.121.1259878968159; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:22:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-fx0-f218.google.com (mail-fx0-f218.google.com [209.85.220.218]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 14sm6707661muo.4.2009.12.03.14.22.46 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:22:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by fxm10 with SMTP id 10so1932075fxm.34 for ; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:22:46 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.27.79 with SMTP id h15mr353215fac.23.1259878966196; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:22:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <200912031516.45316.jkim@FreeBSD.org> References: <2ae8edf30912031035j14443854y6551bb7b125d8550@mail.gmail.com> <200912031516.45316.jkim@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 23:22:46 +0100 Message-ID: <2ae8edf30912031422i6f58af04mf111879317eaa366@mail.gmail.com> From: Wiktor Niesiobedzki To: Jung-uk Kim Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-embedded , freebsd-amd64 Subject: Re: 64-bit support on VIA C7 - on FreeBSD 8.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 22:22:50 -0000 2009/12/3 Jung-uk Kim : >> As far as I understand, this processor should support 64-bit mode >> and I should be able to boot amd64 FreeBSD. > > No, C7 does not support long mode. =C2=A0New Nano family does. > Yes, that's where I got mislead. I've read about Nano processor and that's supporting 64-bit, and I had the impression that it is the same for C7. My mistake. And i thought about 64bit system, as I'm planning to use ZFS and as I understand, this 64bit architecture is recommended. Any way - thanks for clarification. Cheers, Wiktor Niesiobedzki