From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Jan 6 10:48: 3 2001 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 6 10:48:01 2001 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from oddjob.adhesivemedia.com (oddjob.adhesivemedia.com [207.202.159.77]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D7C537B400 for ; Sat, 6 Jan 2001 10:48:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (philip@localhost) by oddjob.adhesivemedia.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA78603; Sat, 6 Jan 2001 10:47:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from philip@adhesivemedia.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 10:47:36 -0800 (PST) From: Philip Hallstrom To: "R.Munden" Cc: Matthew King , Subject: RE: A new FreeBSD commmand In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG WHAT IS WRONG WITH ALL YOU PEOPLE!?!?!?! I suppose none of you remember when you first started with unix and wrote your first shell script and how good you felt that you were actually *doing* something on unix other than typing "mail"??? Is this the type of response that you would want in response to some program you'd written? Give the guy a break. Everyone starts somewhere. At least this guy is contributing something... the rest of you are just being downright mean. -philip On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, R.Munden wrote: > oh yeah, I forgot to put around that > > --rjm-- > > "... one of the main causes of the fall of the Roman Empire was that, > lacking zero, they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C > programs." > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Dima Dorfman > > Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 11:36 PM > > To: R.Munden > > Cc: Matthew King; freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > > Subject: Re: A new FreeBSD commmand > > > > > > > I was wondering if you could add some command line switches in > > case I wanted > > > to see the whole directory and the directory files themselves. > > Something > > > like wdl -a; I think it should imitate the output of ls -la maybe. > > > > If it's implemented as an alias, this functionality is already > > present. 'll' -u works as expected (translates to "ls -l -u"). > > > > Dima Dorfman > > dima@unixfreak.org > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message