From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu May 12 07:13:39 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B50AB38989 for ; Thu, 12 May 2016 07:13:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com (mail-wm0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14B7B1F1E for ; Thu, 12 May 2016 07:13:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x230.google.com with SMTP id e201so246038476wme.0 for ; Thu, 12 May 2016 00:13:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=Fvm1qtcNI0/3bdLEk9JwjOdqXGZ30yBl0mviCenQoTU=; b=NpDtti+QjgwMeKomT6p850AzVNYmcWx3QZCCnjnq/mzt1rHL0v9Ttg9EpMRQ0F+C+d X5wXidbGDYEiNzTGVVyIARlEgKl7Z2c0RBCoRUVDZEzsLKDsXG8OHKTdkhZpf6g+R1Kw oEX+bCvOehVvkdKkY4oMDximWmoDY75jvMoIuBY7Bnz41DjcziDOEJvB0+QWq5wsSjbP X17S/Fa2epPRHtjAV3dtNC0qd/VfrDZ4bOCYs4hB98nqGqwjk58OorY7N34UJ4K/Mk3l H3TLpruRVMuUKYubcxdpa+dG01D1jqscx0ly6lT7LqMlRrKAjHaoa/DrR7oqb0Hf4V5S +eew== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=Fvm1qtcNI0/3bdLEk9JwjOdqXGZ30yBl0mviCenQoTU=; b=FdR+dvCZ01oZ0hCF6dRkuzUnJf9jALEJmyT7P0QGqwxnaTBnZ+WRkZIX1tBCl3mC1e f0t3NWUdTJ+hpz071hP1jWzHZVZC4+IPCvJkmcyLrsPUFX+sem1yEEqK+65unx6jvw9n opGxjMjEf0vly3kAK069CD8PewlP/h6f4N+W2BOzmFRAmpnZTIsb0dCaOf+JM/bmIetB GAB2MagqdMFCiYojD8yILxh0Huqqd7bq4NpF/LIQdpCl94UqgK8PmoNGT6Sa2ljH9C0T 8CRw1FH0oFW/9ua5kYa3nG/BM+Na2bCpPgHEXEeVMHDQC4u1Ga3OmrK+4WmUPQHpb3ju P0uA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWfVIgIou7YyjWZKHV6XNf0Eg/J9xosSEgnmbjYQ4LPIBm0IO72HgTeyk3Yca0BfJ3FgdezmeA1qpdv4A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.28.62.15 with SMTP id l15mr4348006wma.30.1463037217724; Thu, 12 May 2016 00:13:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.28.26.17 with HTTP; Thu, 12 May 2016 00:13:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1463013024.29740.2.camel@michaeleichorn.com> References: <1463013024.29740.2.camel@michaeleichorn.com> Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 08:13:37 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Custom kernel for NAT and PF ? From: krad To: "Michael B. Eichorn" Cc: Chris Hale , FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 07:13:39 -0000 Agreed On 12 May 2016 at 01:30, Michael B. Eichorn wrote: > On Wed, 2016-05-11 at 15:03 -0500, Chris Hale wrote: > > I'm having to rebuild an old freebsd/pf firewall that uses ALTQ and > > some > > NAT directives. Would I need a custom kernel for NAT if I took out > > all of > > the ALTQ references? > > > > The generic kernel is all you need for NAT with pf.