From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 17:38:06 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 384DC160 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:38:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dnebdal@gmail.com) Received: from mail-la0-x22f.google.com (mail-la0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22f]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5558A3 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:38:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f47.google.com with SMTP id fj20so6666951lab.6 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:38:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=27gQ8G/ZJfvjm7ACEGvUMdEDrz6YYnWG7Hcch4szWC4=; b=oBxVZxTT5HDlSAsNQrX1Jy0xcKCB6AM5Bk9BbGZGZ7QmDpLybDN1vPmFSmSNXSBSJe +UY4zLd12Y3UEdpc6MxsUpFHSq06BUkFYVQuKtcJVjh6NeUVsfDAgsF/VOaneqf6hlAe cldSfKCgPoTjIDCxUgOzJxTXUtNo4pY7bqIV1MTW+em9PGg7RXaDeC2wvJoXAN0IA/8W FTOVkgj4VdhZ+MONib5v5u+TFQlYS68yPLPZwYpU/e8K73RkPYsOXuk3RQkuaRz9apdb lnKc39Cw6OlcgVcGn29hvXVSgBz3HFZtHcFNNGMv9D+etoMP17Sy5pDQHfZNqY7Mz28F zQFA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.54.6 with SMTP id f6mr7543239lbp.104.1361295484642; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:38:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.18.134 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:38:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5123B459.9020509@gmail.com> References: <5123A315.20500@gmail.com> <5123B459.9020509@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:38:04 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: x11-wm/windowmaker fails on undefined reference From: Daniel Nebdal To: "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "Ports @ FreeBSD" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:38:06 -0000 Right, so it does find it - it just neglects to set the right flag later. If I manage to both find the time and reproduce it, I can dig a bit - though you're more likely to get a usful answer if someone that actually knows about this chimes in in the meantime. :) -- Daniel Nebdal On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote: > On 02/19/13 10:39, Daniel Nebdal wrote: >> >> The obvious issue is apparently that there's not an "-linotify" in >> that argument list (or, alternatively, that is uses inotify functions >> when it shouldn't) - though I'm far from sure why that would happen. >> Do you have devel/libinotify installed? What does "grep inotify >> work/Window*/config.log " say? >> >> >> -- >> Daniel Nebdal > > > configure:12047: checking sys/inotify.h usability > configure:12047: gcc -c -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wextra > -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-unused-parameter -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600 -DFREEBSD > -I/usr/local/include conftest.c >&5 > configure:12047: $? = 0 > configure:12047: result: yes > configure:12047: checking sys/inotify.h presence > configure:12047: gcpp -I/usr/local/include conftest.c > configure:12047: $? = 0 > configure:12047: result: yes > configure:12047: checking for sys/inotify.h > configure:12047: result: yes > ... > ac_cv_header_sys_inotify_h=yes > > > -- > Yours in Christ, > > Joseph A Nagy Jr > "Whoever loves instruction loves knowledge, But he who hates correction > is stupid." -- Proverbs 12:1 > Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. > Original content CopyFree (F) under the OWL > http://copyfree.org/licenses/owl/license.txt