Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 20 Apr 1999 19:43:25 +0200
From:      Gary Jennejohn <garyj@peedub.muc.de>
To:        freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 3.1 and 0.70 
Message-ID:  <199904201743.TAA52420@peedub.muc.de>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 20 Apr 1999 06:37:24 %2B0200." <Pine.GSO.3.96.990420063518.10760R-100000@koerk> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andreas Gaertner writes:
>On Mon, 19 Apr 1999, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>> I belive I may have introduced this in if_spppsubr.c with a leak from
>> my hot-cell test lab here.  It is belived to be harmless.
>
>i see - but how come the code from 0.70 used in 2.2.7 differs from the one
>used in 3.1?
>
>regards and thanks again,
>

it's called progress ;-)

---
Gary Jennejohn
Home - garyj@muc.de
Work - garyj@fkr.dec.com




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199904201743.TAA52420>