Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 28 Dec 1999 00:30:31 +0200
From:      "Oleg Semyonov" <os@altavista.net>
To:        "hometeam" <hometeam@techpower.net>
Cc:        <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>, <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>, <freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: patches for pppd-2.3.10-radius are here
Message-ID:  <003d01bf50b9$fd8fe120$129718c3@en.zp.ua>
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.10.9912271442260.1742-100000@techpower.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----- Original Message -----
From: hometeam <hometeam@techpower.net>
Sent: Monday, December 27, 1999 4:56 PM


> Before your patch 2.3.10 wouldn't compile on 3.4 by removing the #endif
> it compiled and manual change on configure then it worked just
> didn't log users on the server..

Didn't make a records in utmp/wtmp. This and some number
of other issues are fixed by patch. E.g. added check for account expiration,
check for /etc/ppp/ppp.deny and ppp.shells, and other FreeBSD-specific
stuff which is not required but useful. It all was merged from FreeBSD's
pppd-2.3.5 into 2.3.10-radius. Particularly, some IPX stuff. I was not able
to
test all the magic, so simply move it from one version to another.
Main goal was RADIUS for tcp/ip, PAP, dial-in, no callback.

> I guess we could just add this to 2.3.11 and be upto date with
> pppd finally...

I have no time for this now. May be in 2.3.12? :-)
AFAIK, there is no significant changes in 2.3.11 from 2.3.10.
And I didn't received any feedback about the patches.
All I've got was first impressions and not more. So there is
no driving motive for me to do it now: 2.3.10 works fine.

OS




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?003d01bf50b9$fd8fe120$129718c3>