From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Mon Jul 18 22:52:06 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 702A3B9D5A5 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 22:52:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it0-x233.google.com (mail-it0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37C7F11D9 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 22:52:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it0-x233.google.com with SMTP id j124so4365322ith.1 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 15:52:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=aljem+DvNQsh02PWu5Cvkrjx1XGJEJ0uDlxVAQY5Hpk=; b=x963/FzaA7qXmb0+CyvRX3mZocHL7I3nCS+nTRwk8ejU/gTIMUBgMqxRvkEfFPpMRG osVjqQQYR0ljbkhlkhPCT5Vjxg4hdC/2nDfno4dPSGjNMARNSvh3dsK1P3HtfVcD2mcN 4BBMds27QLkgh4pwJFMFTPluefxZPiLvdaQvfj0GDKmXFVKKBKjgFE+IFt1rSCAOR5O/ 466JQqxl5BP6l44BCh4swTR30PJgv6vOwZLsJfCN334WCWsKc/Nc5YxGqzTN4AIqwW2L t3jPaiaHIIxQJNWLA9bAHexLPlrs1C3qfnqFLdz5hDi9F8r3LWJX2gKVcK0WLtz3jrSW D52g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=aljem+DvNQsh02PWu5Cvkrjx1XGJEJ0uDlxVAQY5Hpk=; b=Q19eRdpFlx9oTVO+4omAkv8DzA85uwk1FjMt2LsAF113brzEyOW7fnbLz6AxzTHMBr ufmKJbVCF0iKj68DBtFk4pVlRWdCmhe6wMIIi3xE3fmgwKuFwrBTFqOD5tY6yKr0nGCV j5laOKIMR2dc+9yONBOUbO5vLr58dvxS4TEZBGhiIvoScfbMlM2bNBsYovKZuVjYHle+ KGIatdVt6izO+q5MVuWWma+MqCoTSwNRBNuy2CC6UtfSfnbfz6cQE/g3dfl6+UCotesg LUHbD78QaUDeaCZogs+vEjyOgWGLXMho2AM520ofHinmgl0fQD1bSxyIK+TqmwTLXGxn ohvA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tINYsWwurCB9oIrT0n65yv932/3mDlxqdbbyxsAJFBf9PELf1s5iqMlwQvgU8BobBIal46HrdKk/OzrHg== X-Received: by 10.36.39.195 with SMTP id g186mr753047ita.53.1468882325718; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 15:52:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.79.78.213 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 15:52:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160718213129.GR13253@nat.rebma.instinctive.eu> References: <578C8934.2010705@club-internet.fr> <20160718213129.GR13253@nat.rebma.instinctive.eu> From: Kevin Oberman Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 15:52:05 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: I5HN5XRtngRFO17OOWex4_45_BY Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to have accelerated graphics with Intel Celeron J1800 (Bay Trail) ? To: Natasha Kerensikova Cc: "freebsd-x11@freebsd.org" , =?UTF-8?Q?Juan_Ram=C3=B3n_Molina_Menor?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 22:52:06 -0000 On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Natasha Kerensikova wrote: > Hello, > > on Monday 18 July 2016 at 09:45, Juan Ram=C3=B3n Molina Menor wrote: > > Hi Natasha. > > Thanks a lot for taking the time to answer. > > > Matthew Macy has done a lot of work recently to support relatively > > recent Intel GPUs in CURRENT. The development branch is in GitHub, I > > suggest you to start here: > > https://github.com/FreeBSDDesktop/freebsd-base-graphics/wiki > > I did encounter that page, though I admit digging seriously into it after > posting to the ML. > > However, it looks like rather experimental stuff, which is fine by me > but slightly besides my original questions. > > So just to be clear and be sure I correctly understood everything I > came across: > > - Is vanilla FreeBSD 11.0 supposed/planned to support Haswell, or have > I misunderstood something at some point? > - Is there any definite information one way or the other about whether > vanilla FreeBSD 11.0 is supposed to support Bay Trail ? > - If not, was it a stretch to assume Bay Trail support when the > both immediate successor (Haswell) and immediate predecessor (Ivy > Bridge) are supported? > 11.0 is should support Haswell, but not any newer GPUs, probably including Bay Trail. Ivy Bridge is supported in 10.3 and will continue to be supported in 11.0. >From what I read, it is hoped that Bay Trail and several newer GPUs will be in 11.1. (That is the Matt Macy work which many people report works well, but clearly is not ready for release.