From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 05:55:39 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8111416A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 05:55:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from luzifer.incubus.de (incubus.de [80.237.207.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42A9D43D2F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 05:55:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mkb@incubus.de) Received: from [192.168.2.10] (pD9542187.dip.t-dialin.net [217.84.33.135]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by luzifer.incubus.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 010A82F690; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 06:55:38 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41DE2457.20508@incubus.de> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 06:55:35 +0100 From: Matthias Buelow User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041124) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kevin Smith References: <41DE22AE.50101@adelphia.net> In-Reply-To: <41DE22AE.50101@adelphia.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how do I permit ordinary users to mound SCSI devices ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 05:55:39 -0000 Kevin Smith wrote: > How do I permit ordinary users to mound SCSI devices ? > > As suggested in the FAQ, section 9, I am able to allow members of > operator group mount the cdrom by setting sysctl -w vfs.usrmount=1 > This does not appear to work with SCSI devices. (ex: /dev/da0s2) > I get the error: > > mount -t msdos /dev/da0s2 ~/ipod > msdosfs: /dev/da0s2: Permission denied the last time I was bitten by that issue, the mount point had to be owned by the user (group write access apparently isn't enough). that's a bit of a problem with things like gui mounters and I hope that that behaviour will be changed sometime in the future. at least I can't see any security problems with a user being able to mount over a mountpoint where he only has group write access. mkb.