From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Tue Dec 19 11:06:51 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F38CE9FFCE
 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Tue, 19 Dec 2017 11:06:51 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from cmt@burggraben.net)
Received: from smtp.burggraben.net (smtp.burggraben.net
 [IPv6:2a01:4f8:140:50a2::3:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "ns.exwg.net", Issuer "Christoph Moench-Tegeder" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 167B9731C3
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 11:06:50 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from cmt@burggraben.net)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp.burggraben.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAE6E6002F0
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:06:47 +0100 (CET)
X-Spam-Scanned: by amavisd-new at exwg.net
Received: from smtp.burggraben.net ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (ns.burggraben.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id cWJAHoRjsdpA for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>;
 Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:06:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: from elch.exwg.net
 (dslb-188-099-232-023.188.099.pools.vodafone-ip.de [188.99.232.23])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "elch.exwg.net", Issuer "Christoph Moench-Tegeder" (verified OK))
 by smtp.burggraben.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:06:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: by elch.exwg.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id 93C7630211; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:06:35 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:06:35 +0100
From: Christoph Moench-Tegeder <cmt@burggraben.net>
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Procmail got updated!
Message-ID: <20171219110635.GA1793@elch.exwg.net>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.21.1712181012470.92288@aneurin.horsfall.org>
 <a3a1097d-22c7-89cc-dd69-b4ceeebf7228@gmx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <a3a1097d-22c7-89cc-dd69-b4ceeebf7228@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 11:06:51 -0000

## Matthias Andree (matthias.andree@gmx.de):

> Sunpoet, can we mark the port as deprecated given that even the upstream
> once said it should best be abolished? I can't find the reference now,

Here:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=769938#11
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=141634350915839&w=2

Regards,
Christoph

-- 
Spare Space