Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 18:21:10 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.8-RELEASE vs SA-03:07 Message-ID: <20030402022110.GA6181@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20030402021244.GA7705@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <20030401141454.N43325-100000@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <87znnaw7vq.fsf@pooh.honeypot.net> <20030401224035.R474@trillian.santala.org> <20030401222116.GB5246@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030402021244.GA7705@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--9amGYk9869ThD9tj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 06:12:44PM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > I think this does not automaticly follow. If you use the -RC label for > identifying the release when it's in a state of final QA and not to > identify the release when it's in -ALPHA or -BETA state, then you avoid > using the -RELEASE label when it's still possible that tags slide. And what about the last-minute (but easily fixed) bug that is discovered after the -RELEASE tag goes down, whenever that happens in the process? Either you slide the tag to fix the bug or you don't. That's what the original poster was talking about. Kris --9amGYk9869ThD9tj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+ikkVWry0BWjoQKURAsHuAKDqdsHOopYCz0WetJWjDjPwJ5T7XwCghLD2 eShB7cNDUpS4vdUCbQ+QbLs= =AgXY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9amGYk9869ThD9tj--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030402022110.GA6181>